Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States; Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States; Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Nov;85:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
Retrospective studies suggest 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will experience sexual abuse before 18 years of age, resulting in future morbidity. Successful interventions exist, however, victims are reluctant to disclose. Screening for childhood sexual abuse (CSA) may provide an opportunity to overcome this barrier, yet no current model for universal CSA screening exists. We sought to understand the perspective of key stakeholders on CSA screening through qualitative research. Eight focus groups of 7-10 participants each (n=62) were conducted from April-September 2016. Stakeholders included school nurses, school teachers, counselors and administrators, pediatric providers, and parents. The interview guide focused on reporting suspected CSA and impressions of a CSA screening tool. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed. Researchers used qualitative content analysis to develop conceptual categories that related to CSA screening and reporting. Two research team members independently open-coded 20% of the data for interrater reliability (kappa=0.98) prior to completing the coding process. Three major categories emerged to inform CSA screening. First, early screening (e.g. kindergarten) was preferred. Confidentiality was a concern, specifically privacy in the school-setting. As CSA perpetrators are often known to the child, parental presence in the medical office was also a concern. Finally, refinement of the screening process was discussed starting with routine education on safe touch and defining "normal." Rather than direct questioning, consistent and repeated offering of opportunities to disclose CSA and identification of a trusted adult were suggested. Next steps should involve partnering with evidence-based CSA prevention programs to incorporate and evaluate the aforementioned elements.
回顾性研究表明,1/4 的女孩和 1/6 的男孩在 18 岁之前会经历性虐待,从而导致未来的发病。虽然存在成功的干预措施,但受害者不愿意透露。对儿童期性虐待(CSA)进行筛查可能提供克服这一障碍的机会,但目前不存在普遍筛查 CSA 的模式。我们试图通过定性研究了解利益攸关方对 CSA 筛查的看法。2016 年 4 月至 9 月期间,共进行了 8 次焦点小组讨论,每组 7-10 名参与者(n=62)。利益攸关方包括学校护士、学校教师、辅导员和管理人员、儿科医生和家长。访谈指南重点关注报告疑似 CSA 和对 CSA 筛查工具的印象。会议进行了录音和转录。研究人员使用定性内容分析来开发与 CSA 筛查和报告相关的概念类别。在完成编码过程之前,两名研究团队成员独立对 20%的数据进行了开放性编码,以确保组内信度(kappa=0.98)。有三个主要类别出现,为 CSA 筛查提供了信息。首先,提倡早期筛查(例如幼儿园)。保密性是一个问题,特别是在学校环境中的隐私问题。由于 CSA 犯罪者通常是孩子认识的人,因此在医疗办公室中也存在父母在场的问题。最后,讨论了筛查过程的细化,从关于安全触摸的常规教育开始,并定义“正常”。建议不是直接提问,而是持续和反复提供披露 CSA 的机会,并确定可信赖的成年人。下一步应与循证 CSA 预防计划合作,纳入和评估上述内容。