通过限制高风险农药使用的法规预防自杀:国际证据的系统评价。

Prevention of suicide with regulations aimed at restricting access to highly hazardous pesticides: a systematic review of the international evidence.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK; South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK; South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e1026-e1037. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30299-1. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pesticide self-poisoning accounts for 14-20% of suicides worldwide. Regulation aimed at restricting access to pesticides or banning highly hazardous pesticides is one approach to reducing these deaths. We systematically reviewed the evidence of the effectiveness of pesticide regulation in reducing the incidence of pesticide suicides and overall suicides.

METHODS

We did a systematic review of the international evidence. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase for studies published between Jan 1, 1960, and Dec 31, 2016, which investigated the effect of national or regional bans, and sales or import restrictions, on the availability of one or more pesticides and the incidence of suicide in different countries. We excluded other interventions aimed at limiting community access to pesticides. We extracted data from studies presenting pesticide suicide data and overall suicide data from before and after national sales restrictions. Two reviewers independently assessed papers for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We undertook a narrative synthesis of the data in each report, and where data were available for the years before and after a ban, we pooled data for the 3 years before and the 3 years after to obtain a crude estimate of the effect of the ban. This study is registered through PROSPERO, number CRD42017053329.

FINDINGS

We identified 27 studies undertaken in 16 countries-five low-income or middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Colombia, India, Jordan and Sri Lanka), and 11 high-income countries (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, UK, and USA). Assessments largely focused on national bans of specific pesticides (12 studies of bans in six countries-Jordan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Greece [Crete], South Korea, and Taiwan) or sales restrictions (eight studies of restrictions in five countries- India, Denmark, Ireland, the UK and the USA). Only five studies used optimum analytical methods. National bans on commonly ingested pesticides in five of the six countries studied, including four studies using optimum analytical methods, were followed by reductions in pesticide suicides and, in three of these countries, falls in overall suicide mortality. Greece was the only country studied that did not show a decrease in pesticide suicide following a ban. There were no high-quality studies of restricting sales to people for occupational uses; four of the seven studies (in three of the five countries studied-India, Denmark, and the USA) showed sales restrictions were followed by decreases in pesticide suicides; one of the two studies investigating trends in overall suicide mortality reported a fall in deaths in Denmark, but there were also decreases in suicide deaths from other methods.

INTERPRETATION

National bans on highly hazardous pesticides, which are commonly ingested in acts of self-poisoning, seem to be effective in reducing pesticide-specific and overall suicide rates. Evidence is less consistent for sales restrictions. A worldwide ban on the use of highly hazardous pesticides is likely to prevent tens of thousands of deaths every year.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

全世界范围内,农药自杀占自杀总人数的 14%-20%。限制获取农药或禁用高风险农药的监管措施是降低此类死亡人数的一种手段。我们系统性地评估了农药监管在降低农药自杀和总自杀发生率方面的有效性证据。

方法

我们对国际证据进行了系统性综述。我们在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Embase 中检索了 1960 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的研究,这些研究调查了国家或地区禁令以及销售或进口限制对一种或多种农药的可获得性和不同国家自杀发生率的影响。我们排除了旨在限制社区获取农药的其他干预措施。我们从报告中呈现农药自杀数据和总自杀数据的研究中提取数据,这些研究来自销售限制之前和之后。两名评审员独立评估论文纳入情况、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。我们对每个报告中的数据进行了叙述性综合,并在有禁令前后年份数据的情况下,对禁令前后 3 年的数据进行了汇总,以获得禁令影响的粗略估计。本研究通过 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42017053329。

结果

我们在 16 个国家发现了 27 项研究——其中 5 项为中低收入国家(孟加拉国、哥伦比亚、印度、约旦和斯里兰卡),11 项为高收入国家(丹麦、芬兰、德国、希腊、匈牙利、爱尔兰、日本、韩国、中国台湾、英国和美国)。评估主要集中在特定农药的国家禁令(6 个国家的 12 项禁令研究——约旦、斯里兰卡、孟加拉国、希腊[克里特岛]、韩国和中国台湾)或销售限制(5 个国家的 8 项限制研究——印度、丹麦、爱尔兰、英国和美国)。只有 5 项研究使用了最佳分析方法。在所研究的 6 个国家中的 5 个国家中,对常见摄入农药的国家禁令,包括 4 项使用最佳分析方法的研究,随后降低了农药自杀率,其中 3 个国家的总体自杀死亡率也有所下降。希腊是唯一没有在禁令后降低农药自杀率的研究国家。没有高质量的研究限制销售给职业用途的人;7 项研究中有 4 项(在 5 个研究国家中有 3 个——印度、丹麦和美国)表明销售限制后农药自杀率下降;两项调查丹麦总体自杀死亡率趋势的研究中有一项报告说丹麦的死亡人数下降,但其他自杀方式的死亡人数也有所下降。

结论

对常见摄入自杀的高风险农药进行国家禁令似乎能有效降低农药特异性和总体自杀率。销售限制的证据不太一致。全球范围内禁止使用高风险农药可能每年会预防数万人死亡。

资金

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索