血液样本采集方法对血液蛋白质谱分析研究影响的数据。

Data on the impact of the blood sample collection methods on blood protein profiling studies.

作者信息

Ilies Maria, Iuga Cristina Adela, Loghin Felicia, Dhople Vishnu Mukund, Thiele Thomas, Völker Uwe, Hammer Elke

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, no. 6 Louis Pasteur st., 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Department of Functional Genomics, Interfaculty Institute of Genetics and Functional Genomics, University Medicine Greifswald, F.-L.-Jahn-Str. 15a, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2017 Jul 14;14:313-319. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.07.025. eCollection 2017 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2017.07.025

PMID:28808673

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544472/

Abstract

Complete blood protein profiles of 4 different blood sample collection methods (EDTA-, heparin- and citrate plasma and serum) were investigated and the data presented herein is an extension of the research article in Ilies et al. [1]. Specimens were depleted of 6 highly abundant proteins and protein profiling was assessed by nano-LC UDMS. Exhaustive protein sets and protein abundances before and after depletion are presented in tables and figures. Also, the core protein set and the unique proteins for each sample collection method previously described [1] are disclosed.

摘要

研究了4种不同血液样本采集方法（乙二胺四乙酸（EDTA）血浆、肝素血浆、枸橼酸盐血浆和血清）的全血蛋白质谱，本文所呈现的数据是伊利耶斯等人[1]研究文章的扩展。样本去除了6种高丰度蛋白质，并通过纳升液相色谱-超高分辨质谱（nano-LC UDMS）评估蛋白质谱。去除前后的详尽蛋白质组和蛋白质丰度以表格和图表形式呈现。此外，还披露了先前描述的[1]每种样本采集方法的核心蛋白质组和独特蛋白质。