Suppr超能文献

胸主动脉腔内修复术对B型主动脉夹层长期生存的影响

The Impact of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair on Long-Term Survival in Type B Aortic Dissection.

作者信息

Lou Xiaoying, Chen Edward P, Duwayri Yazan M, Veeraswamy Ravi K, Jordan William D, Zehner Carl A, Leshnower Bradley G

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, optimal medical therapy is first-line therapy for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD) despite poor long-term outcomes. This study examines the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the acute and chronic phases on short-term and long-term survival of patients presenting with aTBAD.

METHODS

A review of the Emory aortic database from 2000 to 2016 identified 398 patients diagnosed with aTBAD. At index hospitalization, complicated patients underwent TEVAR (aTEVAR [thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the acute phase], n = 80) and uncomplicated patients received optimal medical therapy (n = 318). Uncomplicated patients were divided into subgroups based on final treatment: (1) TEVAR (cTEVAR [thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the chronic phase], n = 87); (2) open aortic replacement (n = 59); and (3) optimal medical therapy (n = 172). Kaplan-Meier curves assessed long-term mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 57 ± 12 years. In the uncomplicated group, 146 patients (45.9%) patients failed optimal medical therapy and underwent open repair (n = 59) or endovascular repair (cTEVAR, n = 87) repair in the chronic phase. Inhospital mortality was 5% and equivalent between complicated and uncomplicated aTBAD groups at index hospitalization. For patients requiring intervention, mortality and renal failure were highest for open patients (16.9%, p < 0.01, and 10.2%, p = 0.05, respectively), and stroke was highest among aTEVAR patients (7.5%, p < 0.01). The incidence of paraparesis and paraplegia was low and equivalent among the three groups. Despite a higher mortality risk at presentation, there was a trend toward improved long-term survival among complicated aTBAD patients (complicated 84.1% versus uncomplicated 58.9%, p = 0.17). Intervention-free survival at 5 and 10 years for all uncomplicated patients was 50.4% and 32.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of uncomplicated aTBAD with optimal medical therapy results in a high incidence of surgical intervention and poor long-term survival. At the index hospitalization, TEVAR may confer a survival advantage and serve as optimal therapy for complicated and uncomplicated aTBAD patients.

摘要

背景

目前,尽管长期预后不佳,但最佳药物治疗仍是单纯性急性B型主动脉夹层(aTBAD)的一线治疗方法。本研究探讨胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)在急性期和慢性期对aTBAD患者短期和长期生存的影响。

方法

回顾2000年至2016年埃默里主动脉数据库,确定398例诊断为aTBAD的患者。在首次住院时,病情复杂的患者接受了TEVAR(急性期胸主动脉腔内修复术[aTEVAR],n = 80),病情不复杂的患者接受了最佳药物治疗(n = 318)。病情不复杂的患者根据最终治疗方法分为亚组:(1)TEVAR(慢性期胸主动脉腔内修复术[cTEVAR],n = 87);(2)开放性主动脉置换术(n = 59);(3)最佳药物治疗(n = 172)。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估长期死亡率。

结果

患者的平均年龄为57±12岁。在病情不复杂的组中,146例(45.9%)患者最佳药物治疗失败,在慢性期接受了开放性修复术(n = 59)或血管腔内修复术(cTEVAR,n = 87)。住院死亡率为5%,在首次住院时,病情复杂和不复杂的aTBAD组之间相当。对于需要干预的患者,开放性手术患者的死亡率和肾衰竭发生率最高(分别为16.9%,p < 0.01和10.2%,p = 0.05),aTEVAR患者的中风发生率最高(7.5%,p < 0.01)。三组中截瘫和偏瘫的发生率较低且相当。尽管就诊时死亡风险较高,但病情复杂的aTBAD患者有长期生存改善的趋势(病情复杂的患者为84.1%,病情不复杂的患者为58.9%,p = 0.17)。所有病情不复杂的患者在5年和10年时无干预生存率分别为50.4%和32.9%。

结论

采用最佳药物治疗单纯性aTBAD会导致手术干预发生率高和长期生存率低。在首次住院时,TEVAR可能具有生存优势,可作为病情复杂和不复杂的aTBAD患者的最佳治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验