Department of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Jurasza 2 Street, 85-089 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Department and Institute of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Dębowa 3 Street, 85-626 Bydgoszcz, Poland; Department and Clinic of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Curie Sklodowskiej 9 Street, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018 Jan 5;147:297-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
For ethical and cost-related reasons, use of animals for the assessment of mode of action, metabolism and/or toxicity of new drug candidates has been increasingly scrutinized in research and industrial applications. Implementation of the 3 "Rs"; rule (Reduction, Replacement, Refinement) through development of in silico or in vitro assays has become an essential element of risk assessment. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is the most potent in silico tool used for extrapolation of pharmacokinetic parameters to animal or human models from results obtained in vitro. Although, many types of in vitro assays are conducted during drug development, use of cell cultures is the most reliable one. Two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures have been a part of drug development for many years. Nowadays, their role is decreasing in favor of three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures and co-cultures. 3D cultures exhibit protein expression patterns and intercellular junctions that are closer to in vivo states in comparison to classical monolayer cultures. Co-cultures allow for examinations of the mutual influence of different cell lines. However, the complexity and high costs of co-cultures and 3D equipment exclude such methods from high-throughput screening (HTS).In vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion assessment, as well as drug-drug interaction (DDI), are usually performed with the use of various cell culture based assays. Progress in in silico and in vitro methods can lead to better in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) outcomes and have a potential to contribute towards a significant reduction in the number of laboratory animals needed for drug research. As such, concentrated efforts need to be spent towards the development of an HTS in vitro platform with satisfactory IVIVE features.
出于伦理和成本方面的原因,在研究和工业应用中,越来越多地审查了使用动物评估新药候选物的作用模式、代谢和/或毒性。通过开发计算或体外测定法实施 3R(减少、替代、优化)原则已成为风险评估的一个重要组成部分。基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)建模是最有效的计算工具,用于将药代动力学参数从体外获得的结果外推到动物或人体模型。虽然在药物开发过程中进行了许多类型的体外测定,但细胞培养是最可靠的方法。二维(2D)细胞培养多年来一直是药物开发的一部分。如今,它们的作用正在下降,而三维(3D)细胞培养和共培养则越来越受欢迎。与经典单层培养相比,3D 培养物表现出更接近体内状态的蛋白质表达模式和细胞间连接。共培养可用于检查不同细胞系之间的相互影响。然而,共培养物和 3D 设备的复杂性和高成本使这些方法无法进行高通量筛选(HTS)。体外吸收、分布、代谢和排泄评估以及药物相互作用(DDI)通常使用各种基于细胞培养的测定法进行。计算和体外方法的进展可以导致更好的体外-体内外推(IVIVE)结果,并有可能有助于大大减少药物研究所需的实验动物数量。因此,需要集中精力开发具有满意 IVIVE 特征的 HTS 体外平台。