Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
Though direct acting antivirals (DAAs) promise high cure rates, many providers and payers remain concerned about successful treatment for people who use drugs (PWUD), even among those engaged in opioid agonist treatment (OAT). The efficacy of DAAs among PWUD in real-world settings is unclear.
We conducted a cohort study of patients initiating HCV treatment between January 2014 and August 2015 (n=89) at a primary care clinic in the Bronx, NY. Onsite HCV treatment with DAAs was performed by an HCV specialist, with support from a care coordinator funded by the NYC Department of Health. We identified four categories of drug use and drug treatment: (1) no active drug use/not receiving OAT (defined as non-PWUD); (2) no active drug use/receiving OAT; (3) active drug use/not receiving OAT; and (4) active drug use/receiving OAT. The primary outcome was SVR at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Overall SVR rates were 95% (n=41/43) for non-PWUD and 96% (n=44/46) for patients actively using drugs and/or receiving OAT [p=0.95]. There were no differences in SVR rates by drug use or drug treatment category. Compared to non-PWUD, those with no active drug use/receiving OAT had 100% SVR (n=15/15; p=1.0), those actively using drugs/not receiving OAT had 90% SVR (n=9/10; p=0.47), and those actively using drugs/receiving OAT had 95% SVR (20/21; p=1.0).
Regardless of active drug use or OAT, patients who received DAA therapy at an urban primary care clinic achieved high HCV cure rates. We found no clinical evidence to justify restricting access to HCV treatment for patients actively using drugs and/or receiving OAT.
尽管直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)有望实现高治愈率,但许多提供者和支付者仍然担心吸毒者(PWUD)的治疗成功,即使是那些接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)的人。在现实环境中,DAAs 在 PWUD 中的疗效尚不清楚。
我们对 2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 8 月期间在纽约布朗克斯区的一家初级保健诊所接受 HCV 治疗的患者进行了一项队列研究(n=89)。HCV 专家在场提供 HCV 治疗,由纽约市卫生部门资助的护理协调员提供支持。我们确定了四种药物使用和药物治疗类别:(1)无主动药物使用/未接受 OAT(定义为非 PWUD);(2)无主动药物使用/接受 OAT;(3)主动药物使用/未接受 OAT;和(4)主动药物使用/接受 OAT。主要结局是治疗后 12 周的 SVR。
非 PWUD 的 SVR 率总体为 95%(n=41/43),主动使用药物和/或接受 OAT 的患者为 96%(n=44/46)[p=0.95]。药物使用或药物治疗类别对 SVR 率无差异。与非 PWUD 相比,无主动药物使用/接受 OAT 的患者 SVR 率为 100%(n=15/15;p=1.0),主动使用药物/未接受 OAT 的患者 SVR 率为 90%(n=9/10;p=0.47),主动使用药物/接受 OAT 的患者 SVR 率为 95%(20/21;p=1.0)。
无论是否主动使用药物或接受 OAT,在城市初级保健诊所接受 DAA 治疗的患者均实现了高 HCV 治愈率。我们没有发现临床证据表明应限制对主动使用药物和/或接受 OAT 的患者进行 HCV 治疗。