• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
High HCV cure rates for people who use drugs treated with direct acting antiviral therapy at an urban primary care clinic.在城市基层医疗诊所,采用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的吸毒者,其 HCV 治愈率较高。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
2
Response to direct-acting antiviral therapy among ongoing drug users and people receiving opioid substitution therapy.正在接受药物治疗的吸毒者和接受阿片类药物替代治疗者对直接作用抗病毒治疗的反应。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jul;71(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Intensive Models of Hepatitis C Care for People Who Inject Drugs Receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.接受阿片类激动剂治疗的注射吸毒者的丙型肝炎强化护理模式:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):594-603. doi: 10.7326/M18-1715. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
4
Hepatitis C reinfection after successful antiviral treatment among people who inject drugs: A meta-analysis.注射吸毒者抗病毒治疗成功后的丙型肝炎再感染:一项荟萃分析。
J Hepatol. 2020 Apr;72(4):643-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
5
Hepatitis C virus reinfection after successful treatment with direct-acting antiviral therapy in a large population-based cohort.在大型基于人群的队列中,使用直接作用抗病毒治疗成功治疗后丙型肝炎病毒再感染。
J Hepatol. 2018 Nov;69(5):1007-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
The Impact of Current Opioid Agonist Therapy on Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Initiation Among People Who Use Drugs From the Direct-acting Antiviral (DAA) Era: A Population-Based Study.直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)时代阿片类激动剂维持治疗对吸毒人群丙型肝炎病毒治疗启动的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 1;74(4):575-583. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab546.
7
Factors associated with lost to follow-up after hepatitis C treatment delivered by primary care teams in an inner-city multi-site program, Vancouver, Canada.在加拿大温哥华的一个多地点市内项目中,基层医疗团队提供丙型肝炎治疗后随访丢失的相关因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
8
Real-world study of hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals in patients with drug abuse and opioid agonist therapy.在药物滥用和阿片类激动剂治疗患者中使用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的真实世界研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;54(5):646-655. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1617893. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C infection among people receiving opioid agonist treatment or heroin assisted treatment.直接作用抗病毒疗法治疗接受阿片类激动剂治疗或海洛因辅助治疗的丙型肝炎感染。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Dec;62:74-77. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life for Hepatitis C Virus-Infected People Who Inject Drugs While on Opioid Agonist Treatment Following Sustained Virologic Response.慢性病毒学应答后接受阿片类激动剂治疗的丙型肝炎病毒感染药物滥用者的健康相关生活质量变化。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 3;74(9):1586-1593. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab669.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatitis C-Everything a Primary Care Physician Needs to Know About Diagnosis, Management, and Follow-Up.丙型肝炎——基层医疗医生需要了解的关于诊断、管理及随访的一切。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4801. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134801.
2
Simplified and Integrated Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Treatment Algorithm for Unhoused People Who Inject Drugs.针对无家可归的注射吸毒者的简化综合丙型肝炎病毒检测与治疗算法
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 May 22;12(6):ofaf302. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf302. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Approaches to Offering Hepatitis C Treatment at Syringe Services Programs in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国注射器服务项目中提供丙型肝炎治疗的方法:一项范围综述
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 8;12(4):ofaf211. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf211. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Barriers to and impacts of hepatitis C treatment among people who inject drugs in Kenya: A qualitative study.肯尼亚注射吸毒者丙型肝炎治疗的障碍与影响:一项定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 16;5(1):e0003284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003284. eCollection 2025.
5
Long-term outcome in people who use drugs successfully treated for hepatitis C infection with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.使用 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 成功治疗丙型肝炎感染的吸毒者的长期结局。
J Virus Erad. 2024 Dec 3;10(4):100569. doi: 10.1016/j.jve.2024.100569. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Barriers to Hepatitis C Treatment and Interest in Telemedicine-Based Care Among Clients of a Syringe Access Program.丙肝治疗的障碍以及注射器交换项目服务对象对远程医疗护理的兴趣
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 13;11(3):ofae088. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae088. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Does a simplified algorithm and integrated HCV care model improve linkage to care, retention, and cure among people who inject drugs? A pragmatic quality improvement randomized controlled trial protocol.简化算法和综合 HCV 护理模式是否能提高注射吸毒人群的治疗关联、保留率和治愈率?一项实用的质量改进随机对照试验方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 19;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-08982-1.
8
Harm reduction in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a systematic scoping review.本科和研究生医学教育中的减少伤害:系统范围界定审查。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 21;23(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04931-9.
9
Frame Shift: Focusing on Harm Reduction and Shared Decision Making for People Who Use Drugs Hospitalized With Infections.移码突变:关注感染住院吸毒者的减少伤害和共同决策。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):e12-e26. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad664.
10
Evaluation of a person-centred, nurse-led model of care delivering hepatitis C testing and treatment in priority settings: a mixed-methods evaluation of the Tasmanian Eliminate Hepatitis C Australia Outreach Project, 2020-2022.评价一种以患者为中心、由护士主导的护理模式,在优先环境下提供丙型肝炎检测和治疗:2020-2022 年塔斯马尼亚消除澳大利亚丙型肝炎外联项目的混合方法评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):2289. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17066-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial outcomes of integrated community-based hepatitis C treatment for people who inject drugs: Findings from the Queensland Injectors' Health Network.基于社区的综合丙型肝炎治疗对注射吸毒者的初步效果:昆士兰注射者健康网络的研究结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.056. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Understanding real-world adherence in the directly acting antiviral era: A prospective evaluation of adherence among people with a history of drug use at a community-based program in Toronto, Canada.在直接作用抗病毒时代理解真实世界的依从性:对加拿大多伦多一个社区项目中具有药物使用史人群的依从性进行的前瞻性评估。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
Delivering direct acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C to highly marginalised and current drug injecting populations in a targeted primary health care setting.在目标性基层医疗保健环境中为高度边缘化且当前有药物注射史的丙型肝炎人群提供直接作用抗病毒治疗。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
4
Hepatitis C treatment as prevention: evidence, feasibility, and challenges.丙型肝炎治疗即预防:证据、可行性和挑战。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;1(4):317-327. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30075-9. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Elbasvir-Grazoprevir to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Persons Receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy: A Randomized Trial.依巴司韦/格拉瑞韦治疗接受阿片类激动剂治疗的丙型肝炎病毒感染者:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;165(9):625-634. doi: 10.7326/M16-0816. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Recommendations for the management of hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs.注射吸毒者丙型肝炎病毒感染管理建议
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Oct;26(10):1028-38. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Restrictions for Medicaid Reimbursement of Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States.美国医疗补助计划对索磷布韦治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染的报销限制。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 4;163(3):215-23. doi: 10.7326/M15-0406.
8
A systematic review of Hepatitis C virus treatment uptake among people who inject drugs in the European Region.对欧洲区域注射毒品者丙型肝炎病毒治疗接受情况的系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-S6-S16. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
9
Can hepatitis C virus infection be eradicated in people who inject drugs?注射毒品的人丙型肝炎病毒感染能被根除吗?
Antiviral Res. 2014 Apr;104:62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
10
Uptake of hepatitis C treatment among people who inject drugs attending Needle and Syringe Programs in Australia, 1999-2011.1999年至2011年期间,澳大利亚参与针头和注射器项目的注射吸毒者中丙型肝炎治疗的接受情况。
J Viral Hepat. 2014 Mar;21(3):198-207. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12129. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

在城市基层医疗诊所,采用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的吸毒者,其 HCV 治愈率较高。

High HCV cure rates for people who use drugs treated with direct acting antiviral therapy at an urban primary care clinic.

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.021
PMID:28811158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5822435/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Though direct acting antivirals (DAAs) promise high cure rates, many providers and payers remain concerned about successful treatment for people who use drugs (PWUD), even among those engaged in opioid agonist treatment (OAT). The efficacy of DAAs among PWUD in real-world settings is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of patients initiating HCV treatment between January 2014 and August 2015 (n=89) at a primary care clinic in the Bronx, NY. Onsite HCV treatment with DAAs was performed by an HCV specialist, with support from a care coordinator funded by the NYC Department of Health. We identified four categories of drug use and drug treatment: (1) no active drug use/not receiving OAT (defined as non-PWUD); (2) no active drug use/receiving OAT; (3) active drug use/not receiving OAT; and (4) active drug use/receiving OAT. The primary outcome was SVR at 12 weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS

Overall SVR rates were 95% (n=41/43) for non-PWUD and 96% (n=44/46) for patients actively using drugs and/or receiving OAT [p=0.95]. There were no differences in SVR rates by drug use or drug treatment category. Compared to non-PWUD, those with no active drug use/receiving OAT had 100% SVR (n=15/15; p=1.0), those actively using drugs/not receiving OAT had 90% SVR (n=9/10; p=0.47), and those actively using drugs/receiving OAT had 95% SVR (20/21; p=1.0).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of active drug use or OAT, patients who received DAA therapy at an urban primary care clinic achieved high HCV cure rates. We found no clinical evidence to justify restricting access to HCV treatment for patients actively using drugs and/or receiving OAT.

摘要

背景

尽管直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)有望实现高治愈率,但许多提供者和支付者仍然担心吸毒者(PWUD)的治疗成功,即使是那些接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)的人。在现实环境中,DAAs 在 PWUD 中的疗效尚不清楚。

方法

我们对 2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 8 月期间在纽约布朗克斯区的一家初级保健诊所接受 HCV 治疗的患者进行了一项队列研究(n=89)。HCV 专家在场提供 HCV 治疗,由纽约市卫生部门资助的护理协调员提供支持。我们确定了四种药物使用和药物治疗类别:(1)无主动药物使用/未接受 OAT(定义为非 PWUD);(2)无主动药物使用/接受 OAT;(3)主动药物使用/未接受 OAT;和(4)主动药物使用/接受 OAT。主要结局是治疗后 12 周的 SVR。

结果

非 PWUD 的 SVR 率总体为 95%(n=41/43),主动使用药物和/或接受 OAT 的患者为 96%(n=44/46)[p=0.95]。药物使用或药物治疗类别对 SVR 率无差异。与非 PWUD 相比,无主动药物使用/接受 OAT 的患者 SVR 率为 100%(n=15/15;p=1.0),主动使用药物/未接受 OAT 的患者 SVR 率为 90%(n=9/10;p=0.47),主动使用药物/接受 OAT 的患者 SVR 率为 95%(20/21;p=1.0)。

结论

无论是否主动使用药物或接受 OAT,在城市初级保健诊所接受 DAA 治疗的患者均实现了高 HCV 治愈率。我们没有发现临床证据表明应限制对主动使用药物和/或接受 OAT 的患者进行 HCV 治疗。