Suppr超能文献

在加拿大温哥华的一个多地点市内项目中,基层医疗团队提供丙型肝炎治疗后随访丢失的相关因素。

Factors associated with lost to follow-up after hepatitis C treatment delivered by primary care teams in an inner-city multi-site program, Vancouver, Canada.

机构信息

Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Pender Community Health Centre, 59 West Pender St, Vancouver, BC V6B 1R3, Canada; University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Pender Community Health Centre, 59 West Pender St, Vancouver, BC V6B 1R3, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hepatitis c virus (HCV) with direct-acting-antivirals (DAAs) by family physicians in primary care and addiction settings may allow treatment expansion to inner-city populations, including people who inject drugs (PWID). Real-world data however, suggests high rates of non-attendance to SVR 12 testing. This study examines outcomes of HCV treatment delivered by family physicians working in interdisciplinary treatment programs, integrated into inner-city primary care clinics.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort, participants completed baseline questionnaires, including questions on demographics and substance use. Participants were recorded as achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR 12) if HCV RNA was undetectable 12 weeks following end of therapy, and were recorded as lost to follow-up (LTFU) if they did not present for an HCV follow-up visit. SVR was calculated in intention to treat (ITT) as well as modified intention to treat (mITT) analysis, which excluded those who completed treatment but had no SVR 12 result. A logistic regression model assessed factors associated with LTFU.

RESULTS

Of 138 individuals included in the analysis, 52% were on opioid agonist therapy (OAT), 75% reported a history of injection drug use (IDU), with 25% reporting IDU in the month prior to treatment initiation. ITT SVR across all sites and genotypes was 86% and mITT was 95%. There was a significant difference in mITT for those reporting recent IDU compared to those who did not (87% vs 99% p = 0.03). While 13% were LTFU at SVR 12, participants receiving OAT in the same clinic as HCV treatment were less likely to be LTFU (aOR 0.09(0.02-0.46)).

CONCLUSION

HCV treatment by family physicians, along with interdisciplinary teams, can be successful in inner-city populations in the era of DAAs; however, follow-up after treatment is a challenge. Integrating OAT in the same location as HCV treatment may help to improve follow-up.

摘要

背景

家庭医生在初级保健和成瘾治疗环境中使用直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV),可能会将治疗范围扩大到包括注射毒品者(PWID)在内的城市内人群。然而,实际数据表明,未能按时进行 SVR12 检测的比例较高。本研究考察了在城市内初级保健诊所中,从事跨学科治疗项目的家庭医生提供 HCV 治疗的结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,参与者完成了基线问卷,包括人口统计学和药物使用方面的问题。如果 HCV RNA 在治疗结束后 12 周内无法检测到,则将参与者记录为获得持续病毒学应答(SVR12),如果他们未进行 HCV 随访就诊,则将其记录为失访(LTFU)。按照意向治疗(ITT)和改良意向治疗(mITT)分析计算 SVR,后者排除了那些完成治疗但没有 SVR12 结果的患者。使用逻辑回归模型评估与 LTFU 相关的因素。

结果

在纳入分析的 138 名患者中,52%正在接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT),75%报告有注射药物使用史(IDU),其中 25%在开始治疗前的一个月内有 IDU。所有地点和基因型的 ITT SVR 为 86%,mITT 为 95%。与未报告近期 IDU 的患者相比,报告近期 IDU 的患者的 mITT 有显著差异(87%比 99%,p=0.03)。尽管在 SVR12 时有 13%的患者失访,但在接受 HCV 治疗的同时在同一诊所接受 OAT 的患者,LTFU 的可能性较低(优势比 0.09(0.02-0.46))。

结论

在直接作用抗病毒药物时代,家庭医生与跨学科团队合作,可以在城市内人群中成功治疗 HCV;然而,治疗后的随访是一个挑战。在 HCV 治疗的同一地点整合 OAT 可能有助于改善随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验