Revisiting the Randomized Controlled Trial.
作者信息
Zulfiqar Hassam
出版信息
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):517-518. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.13221.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Revisiting the Randomized Controlled Trial.重新审视随机对照试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):517-518. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.13221.
2
Revisiting sample size: are big trials the answer?重新审视样本量：大试验是答案吗？
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94 Suppl 1:75-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01270.
3
Examining Clinical Meaningfulness in Randomized Controlled Trials: Revisiting the Well Elderly II.审视随机对照试验中的临床意义：重温“健康老年人II”研究
Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan/Feb;73(1):7301205120p1-7301205120p13. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2019.030874.
4
A plea to provide best evidence in trials under sample-size restrictions: the example of pioglitazone to resolve leukoplakia and erythroplakia in Fanconi anemia patients.在样本量受限的试验中提供最佳证据的呼吁：以吡格列酮治疗范可尼贫血患者口腔白斑和红斑为例
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 May 25;12(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0655-8.
5
Revisiting the Heterogeneous IFN-γ Response of Bacille of Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-Revaccinated Healthy Volunteers in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Effect of the Body Mass Index and of the IFNG+874 A/T Polymorphism.在一项随机对照试验中重新审视卡介苗（BCG）复种健康志愿者的异质性γ-干扰素反应：体重指数和IFNG +874 A/T多态性的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 29;11(7):e0160149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160149. eCollection 2016.
6
Revisiting the level of evidence in randomized controlled clinical trials: A simulation approach.重新审视随机对照临床试验中的证据水平：一种模拟方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Sep;30(5):400-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
7
[A comparative study of how subjects' characteristics and nursing service quality influence on hospital revisiting intent between patients and nurses].一项关于患者与护士的特征及护理服务质量如何影响患者再次入院意愿的对比研究
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2005 Dec;35(7):1210-20. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2005.35.7.1210.
8
The randomized controlled clinical trial. Scientific and ethical bases.随机对照临床试验。科学与伦理基础。
Am J Med. 1982 Sep;73(3):420-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90746-x.
9
Occupational therapy predischarge home visits for patients with a stroke (HOVIS): results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial.职业治疗师对脑卒中患者出院前家访（HOVIS）：一项可行性随机对照试验的结果。
Clin Rehabil. 2013 May;27(5):387-97. doi: 10.1177/0269215512462145. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design.比较传统放疗与立体定向体部放疗在脊柱转移瘤患者中的疗效：一项遵循队列多重随机对照试验设计的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 21;16(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2947-0.
引用本文的文献
1
How about the evidence assessment tools used in education and management systematic reviews?用于教育与管理系统评价的证据评估工具情况如何？
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 9;10:1160289. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160289. eCollection 2023.
本文引用的文献
1
Does the model of additive effect in placebo research still hold true? A narrative review.安慰剂研究中的相加效应模型是否仍然成立？一项叙述性综述。
JRSM Open. 2017 Feb 1;8(3):2054270416681434. doi: 10.1177/2054270416681434. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
Are placebo and drug-specific effects additive? Questioning basic assumptions of double-blinded randomized clinical trials and presenting novel study designs.安慰剂效应和药物特异性效应是相加的吗？质疑双盲随机临床试验的基本假设并提出新的研究设计。
Drug Discov Today. 2017 Apr;22(4):729-735. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
3
Placebo Effects in Medicine.医学中的安慰剂效应。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):8-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1504023.
4
The powerful placebo.强效安慰剂
J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Dec 24;159(17):1602-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006.
5
Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine.故意忽视：医学中盲目评估与安慰剂对照的历史
Bull Hist Med. 1998 Fall;72(3):389-433. doi: 10.1353/bhm.1998.0159.
6
Powerful placebo: the dark side of the randomised controlled trial.强效安慰剂：随机对照试验的阴暗面
Lancet. 1998 Jun 6;351(9117):1722-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10111-8.
7
The Fielding H. Garrison Lecture: Ceteris paribus: the evolution of the clinical trial.
Bull Hist Med. 1982 Spring;56(1):1-18.
Zotero 插件