• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的独立椎间融合器与颈椎前路钢板的配对队列分析。

A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

作者信息

Overley Samuel C, Merrill Robert K, Leven Dante M, Meaike Joshua J, Kumar Abhishek, Qureshi Sheeraz A

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2017 Aug;7(5):394-399. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699211. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1177/2192568217699211
PMID:28811982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544154/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matched them with 40 patients who received an anterior cervical plate. We statistically compared operative time, length of stay, proportion of ambulatory cases, overall complications necessitating a trip to the ED, readmission, or reoperation related to index procedure.

RESULTS

There were 21 women and 19 men in the plate cohort with average ages of 53 years ± 12 and 20 women and 20 men in the stand-alone group with an average age of 52 years ± 11. With no statistical difference in total number, the plate group experienced 4 short-term (within 90 days of discharge) complications, including 3 patients who visited the emergency department for dysphagia and 1 who visited the emergency department for severe back pain, while the stand-alone group experienced 0 complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the stand-alone group (75.35 min) and the plate group (81.35 min; = .37). There was a significant difference between the proportion of ambulatory cases in the stand-alone group (25) and the plate group (6; < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that stand-alone cages have fewer complications compared to anterior plating, with a lower trend of incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Stand-alone cages may offer the advantage of sending patients home ambulatory after ACDF surgery.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

比较用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的独立椎间融合器与颈椎前路钢板的围手术期特征。

方法

我们回顾了40例接受择期ACDF并使用独立椎间融合器的成年患者,并将他们与40例接受颈椎前路钢板的患者进行匹配。我们对手术时间、住院时间、门诊病例比例、因索引手术需要前往急诊科、再次入院或再次手术的总体并发症进行了统计学比较。

结果

钢板组有21名女性和19名男性,平均年龄为53岁±12岁;独立椎间融合器组有20名女性和20名男性,平均年龄为52岁±11岁。两组总数无统计学差异,钢板组发生4例短期(出院后90天内)并发症,包括3例因吞咽困难前往急诊科的患者和1例因严重背痛前往急诊科的患者,而独立椎间融合器组无并发症发生。独立椎间融合器组(75.35分钟)与钢板组(81.35分钟;P = 0.37)的手术时间无显著差异。独立椎间融合器组(25例)与钢板组(6例)的门诊病例比例有显著差异(P < 0.0001)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与前路钢板相比,独立椎间融合器的并发症更少,术后吞咽困难的发生率呈较低趋势。独立椎间融合器可能具有ACDF手术后让患者门诊回家的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a1/5544154/0d68cba00730/10.1177_2192568217699211-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a1/5544154/0d68cba00730/10.1177_2192568217699211-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a1/5544154/0d68cba00730/10.1177_2192568217699211-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.一项比较用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的独立椎间融合器与颈椎前路钢板的配对队列分析。
Global Spine J. 2017 Aug;7(5):394-399. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699211. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
2
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.使用自锁独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与使用椎间融合器和钢板的ACDF治疗三级颈椎退行性脊椎病的比较:一项为期2年随访的回顾性研究
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.新型零轮廓独立式斐济颈椎椎间融合器与颈椎前路钢板用于单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较:至少2年的随访研究
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1129-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4739-2. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: Minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes.自锁独立椎间融合器与颈椎前路钢板用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较:影像学及临床结果的至少3年评估
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;170:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.033. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone anchored cages versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.前路颈椎间盘切除及独立锚定椎间融合器融合术与后路椎板切除术及融合术治疗四节段脊髓型颈椎病的回顾性研究:两年随访
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 12;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2136-1.
7
Radiographic Fusion Rates Following a Stand-alone Interbody Cage Versus an Anterior Plate Construct for Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段病变行单纯椎间融合器与前路钢板固定的融合率比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 1;45(11):713-717. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003387.
8
A Clinical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plates Versus Stand-Alone Intervertebral Fusion Devices for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures.前路颈椎钢板与独立椎间融合器用于单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的临床比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:630-637. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.060. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
9
Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?用于颈椎前路融合术的独立椎间融合器:不存在问题吗?
Korean J Spine. 2016 Mar;13(1):13-9. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Stand-alone Cervical Cages Versus Anterior Cervical Plates in 2-Level Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Patients: Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration.2节段颈椎前路椎间融合患者中独立颈椎椎间融合器与颈椎前路钢板的比较:相邻节段退变分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Aug;28(7):E433-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a355ad.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Segmental Motion up to 1 Year Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Plate versus Non-plate.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后长达1年的节段运动:钢板固定与非钢板固定对比
Asian Spine J. 2023 Jun;17(3):492-499. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0192. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Effects of Anterior Plating on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Improvement Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.前路钢板对单节段颈椎间盘切除融合术后实现具有临床意义的改善的影响。
Neurospine. 2022 Jun;19(2):315-322. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142214.107. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
3
Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Standalone Versus Cage and Plate Constructs for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes, Narcotics Utilization, and Costs After an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Stand-alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后手术结果、麻醉药物使用及费用的比较:独立椎间融合器与前路钢板固定术
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):E1201-E1205. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000341.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.门诊日间手术环境下与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:1000例连续病例分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):878-84. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
单纯前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与椎间融合器加钢板植入融合术的临床及影像学结果比较
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):403-412. doi: 10.14444/8060. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
[Observation of stand-alone MC+polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) Cage in anterior cervical double-level fusion for more than 2 years follow-up].[颈椎前路双节段融合中单独使用MC+聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的观察:超过2年的随访]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 15;33(9):1151-1155. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201901036.
5
Stand-Alone Cervical Cages in 2-Level Anterior Interbody Fusion in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results from a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.独立颈椎椎间融合器用于脊髓型颈椎病双节段前路椎间融合术:至少2年随访结果
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):225-232. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0193. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Comparison of the outcomes of cage-stand-alone with cage-with-plate fixation in one level and two levels for treating cervical disk diseases.单节段和双节段颈椎间盘疾病治疗中单纯椎间融合器与椎间融合器联合钢板固定的疗效比较。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):170-174. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_74_18.
Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.
零切迹椎间融合器与传统椎间融合器在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中治疗退行性颈椎病的Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Sep 17;10:148. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0290-9.
4
Zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device reduces rate of adjacent-level ossification development and dysphagia compared to ACDF with plating and cage system.与采用钢板和椎间融合器系统的前路颈椎间盘切除融合术相比,零轮廓一体化钢板及椎间融合器装置降低了相邻节段骨化的发生率及吞咽困难的发生率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):781-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2212-z. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review.门诊环境下门诊前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性病历审查。
Int J Spine Surg. 2013 Dec 1;7:e84-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.06.001. eCollection 2013.
6
The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.零切迹椎间融合器在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的应用
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24(1):148-54. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3628-9. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes of a zero-profile device concerning reduced postoperative Dysphagia after single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.零切迹装置在单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后减少吞咽困难方面的临床和影像学结果的比较研究
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014 Aug;56(2):103-7. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.56.2.103. Epub 2014 Aug 31.
8
Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中单独锚定椎间融合器与带钢板椎间融合器的比较:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1547-4. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
9
The application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.零切迹植入物在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的应用。
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar;21(3):462-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.一体式椎间融合器与单节段颈椎融合构建中 ACDF 前路锁定钢板的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.088. Epub 2013 Nov 12.