• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼动追踪评估健康个体对威胁性词语的注意偏向的可靠性。

The reliability of eyetracking to assess attentional bias to threatening words in healthy individuals.

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Australia, Margarete Ainsworth Building, Barker Street, Randwick, 2031, New South Wales, Australia.

Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1778-1792. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0946-y.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-017-0946-y
PMID:28812285
Abstract

Eyetracking is commonly used to investigate attentional bias. Although some studies have investigated the internal consistency of eyetracking, data are scarce on the test-retest reliability and agreement of eyetracking to investigate attentional bias. This study reports the test-retest reliability, measurement error, and internal consistency of 12 commonly used outcome measures thought to reflect the different components of attentional bias: overall attention, early attention, and late attention. Healthy participants completed a preferential-looking eyetracking task that involved the presentation of threatening (sensory words, general threat words, and affective words) and nonthreatening words. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to measure test-retest reliability (ICC > .70 indicates adequate reliability). The ICCs(2, 1) ranged from -.31 to .71. Reliability varied according to the outcome measure and threat word category. Sensory words had a lower mean ICC (.08) than either affective words (.32) or general threat words (.29). A longer exposure time was associated with higher test-retest reliability. All of the outcome measures, except second-run dwell time, demonstrated low measurement error (<6%). Most of the outcome measures reported high internal consistency (α > .93). Recommendations are discussed for improving the reliability of eyetracking tasks in future research.

摘要

眼动追踪通常用于研究注意偏向。尽管一些研究已经调查了眼动追踪的内部一致性,但关于眼动追踪研究注意偏向的重测信度和一致性的数据却很少。本研究报告了 12 种常用的测量方法的重测信度、测量误差和内部一致性,这些方法被认为反映了注意偏向的不同成分:总体注意、早期注意和晚期注意。健康参与者完成了一项偏好性眼动追踪任务,该任务涉及呈现威胁性(感觉词、一般威胁词和情感词)和非威胁性词。我们使用组内相关系数(ICC)来衡量重测信度(ICC>.70 表示信度足够)。ICC(2,1)范围从-.31 到.71。可靠性因测量方法和威胁词类别而异。感觉词的平均 ICC(.08)低于情感词(.32)或一般威胁词(.29)。更长的暴露时间与更高的重测信度相关。除了第二运行停留时间外,所有的测量方法都表现出较低的测量误差(<6%)。大多数测量方法的内部一致性较高(α>.93)。为了提高未来研究中眼动追踪任务的可靠性,提出了一些建议。

相似文献

1
The reliability of eyetracking to assess attentional bias to threatening words in healthy individuals.眼动追踪评估健康个体对威胁性词语的注意偏向的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1778-1792. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0946-y.
2
Do people with acute low back pain have an attentional bias to threat-related words?急性腰痛患者是否对威胁相关的词语存在注意力偏向?
Scand J Pain. 2021 May 21;21(3):485-494. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0014. Print 2021 Jul 27.
3
The reliability of attentional biases for emotional images measured using a free-viewing eye-tracking paradigm.使用自由观看眼动追踪范式测量情绪图像注意力偏差的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2748-2760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1147-z.
4
Increased attention allocation to socially threatening faces in social anxiety disorder: A replication study.社交焦虑障碍中对社会威胁性面孔注意力分配增加:一项重复研究。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jul 1;290:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.063. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.在点探测任务中,对威胁的注意偏向的行为和 ERP 测量:可靠性差,与焦虑无关。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 4;5:1368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01368. eCollection 2014.
6
Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.评估社交焦虑障碍人群在点探测任务中注意偏向和注意偏向可变性测量的可靠性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep;32(9):883-888. doi: 10.1037/pas0000912. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: Robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices.食物注意偏向的重测信度:稳健的眼动追踪和反应时指标。
Appetite. 2019 May 1;136:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Threat and fear of pain induces attentional bias to pain words: An eye-tracking study.对疼痛的威胁和恐惧会引发对疼痛相关词汇的注意偏向:一项眼动追踪研究。
Eur J Pain. 2017 Feb;21(2):385-396. doi: 10.1002/ejp.936. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?焦虑相关注意偏向:它可靠吗?
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:529-554. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
10
Quantifying test-retest reliability of repeated objective attentional measures in Lewy body dementia.量化路易体痴呆中重复客观注意力测量的测试-重测信度。
J Neurol. 2022 Jul;269(7):3605-3613. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-10977-4. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Social rejection sensitivity and its role in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of experimental literature.社交拒绝敏感性及其在神经性厌食症中的作用:实验文献的系统综述
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 10;13(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01261-7.
2
Attention to facial emotions in adult women varies by type and severity of childhood maltreatment experience and emotion regulation strategy.成年女性对面部情绪的关注因童年虐待经历的类型和严重程度以及情绪调节策略而异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99562-z.
3
Attention Allocation for Dysphoric Information in Adults with Depression Symptoms Using Eye-tracking and Mouse-tracking.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement error and the replication crisis.测量误差与可重复性危机。
Science. 2017 Feb 10;355(6325):584-585. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3618.
2
Attentional bias modification in depression through gaze contingencies and regulatory control using a new eye-tracking intervention paradigm: study protocol for a placebo-controlled trial.通过注视偶联和使用新的眼动追踪干预范式进行调节控制来改变抑郁症中的注意偏向:一项安慰剂对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1150-9.
3
Attentional bias modification and pain: The role of sensory and affective stimuli.
使用眼动追踪和鼠标追踪对有抑郁症状的成年人的烦躁信息进行注意力分配
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 7;20(4):e0318923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318923. eCollection 2025.
4
Attentional bias in tobacco use disorder using eye tracking: A systematic review.使用眼动追踪技术对烟草使用障碍中注意偏向的系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Nov 2;13:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100294. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Older and younger job seekers' attention towards metastereotypes in job ads.老年和年轻求职者对招聘广告中metastereotype 的关注。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 30;19(10):e0312323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312323. eCollection 2024.
6
Trait-Anxious People Take Longer to Search for Happy Faces in the Presence of Neutral and Fearful Distractors.在存在中性和恐惧性干扰物的情况下,特质焦虑的人寻找快乐面孔的时间更长。
Trends Psychol. 2024;32(2):572-588. doi: 10.1007/s43076-023-00305-8. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
The effect of an odd-one-out visual search task on attentional bias, body size adaptation, and body dissatisfaction.异常项视觉搜索任务对注意偏向、体型适应及身体不满的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):231817. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231817. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
The Ambiguous Cue Task: Measurement reliability of an experimental paradigm for the assessment of interpretation bias and associations with mental health.歧义线索任务:评估解释偏差的实验范式的测量可靠性及其与心理健康的关联。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7774-7789. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02451-y. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
9
Emotion and anxiety interact to bias spatial attention.情绪和焦虑相互作用,影响空间注意力。
Emotion. 2024 Jun;24(4):1109-1124. doi: 10.1037/emo0001322. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
A Systematic Review of Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling.问题性赌博注意偏向的系统评价
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):493-519. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10260-9. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
注意偏向修正与疼痛:感觉和情感刺激的作用。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Aug;83:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
Social anxiety is related to increased dwell time on socially threatening faces.社交焦虑与在具有社交威胁性的面孔上停留时间增加有关。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 15;193:282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Towards a new model of attentional biases in the development, maintenance, and management of pain.朝向疼痛发展、维持及管理中注意偏向的新模型。
Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1589-1600. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000214.
6
Double attention bias for positive and negative emotional faces in clinical depression: evidence from an eye-tracking study.临床抑郁症中对积极和消极情绪面孔的双重注意偏向:一项眼动追踪研究的证据。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
7
More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain.所见非所得:报告慢性疼痛的个体的视觉注意力偏差。
J Pain Res. 2014 Sep 19;7:557-70. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S67431. eCollection 2014.
8
Using eye movements to investigate selective attention in chronic daily headache.运用眼动研究慢性每日头痛的选择性注意。
Pain. 2014 Mar;155(3):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Avoidance of affective pain stimuli predicts chronicity in patients with acute low back pain.避免情感性疼痛刺激可预测急性下背痛患者的慢性化。
Pain. 2014 Jan;155(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
The words patients use to describe chronic pain: implications for measuring pain quality.患者用来描述慢性疼痛的词语:对疼痛质量测量的影响。
Pain. 2013 Dec;154(12):2722-2728. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 8.