• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贸易政策与健康:将回顾性研究纳入研究议程——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》

Trade Policy and Health: Adding Retrospective Studies to the Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".

机构信息

Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies on International Trade and Investment, Institute for Advanced International Studies (HEI), Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):243-244. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.123.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.123
PMID:28812809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5384988/
Abstract

Prospective studies of the potential health consequences of trade and investment treaties, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, are critical. These studies can make visible to trade policy-makers the potential negative impacts associated to such treaties and can influence the outcomes of such negotiations. However, few researchers have examined retrospectively the consequences of trade agreements. With more than 400 trade agreements and more than 2000 investment treaties currently in force, researchers have a large corpus of agreements to analyse in order to assess not only their potential impacts on health system and population health, but also their actual impacts. This comment suggests some research questions that would benefit from retrospective inquiry.

摘要

对于贸易和投资条约(如跨太平洋伙伴关系协定)可能对健康造成的影响进行前瞻性研究至关重要。这些研究可以让贸易政策制定者看到此类条约可能带来的负面影响,并影响此类谈判的结果。然而,很少有研究人员回顾性地研究贸易协定的后果。目前有 400 多项贸易协定和 2000 多项投资条约生效,研究人员有大量的协定可供分析,以便评估它们对卫生系统和人口健康的潜在影响,以及它们的实际影响。本评论提出了一些研究问题,这些问题将受益于回顾性调查。

相似文献

1
Trade Policy and Health: Adding Retrospective Studies to the Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".贸易政策与健康:将回顾性研究纳入研究议程——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):243-244. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.123.
2
Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".推进变化中的全球贸易和投资议程中的公共卫生事业——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):295-298. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.129.
3
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
4
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Should We "Fear the Fear"? Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:我们应该“恐惧恐惧”吗?》评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):353-355. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.140.
5
Just Say No to the TPP: A Democratic Setback for American and Asian Public Health Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".对 TPP 说不:美国和亚洲公共卫生的民主挫折 评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jul 1;6(7):419-421. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145.
6
What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership.在贸易政策制定中,是什么引起了对健康的关注?从烟草控制和药品获取方面的成功经验中吸取的教训:对澳大利亚和(全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定)的定性研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Oct 1;10(10):613-624. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.80.
7
Current Models of Investor State Dispute Settlement Are Bad for Health: The European Union Could Offer an Alternative Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".现行的投资者与国家争端解决模式不利于健康:欧盟可能提供另一种方案——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Mar 1;6(3):177-179. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.116.
8
Assessing the Health Impact of Trade: A Call for an Expanded Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".评估贸易对健康的影响:扩大研究议程的呼吁——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样对健康造成影响?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):293-294. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.126.
9
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.分析贸易和投资协定对药品政策的影响:规定、途径和潜在影响。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2.
10
Is It Time to Say Farewell to the ISDS System? Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".是否是时候告别 ISDS 体系了?评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否是我们对健康的一切担忧?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):289-291. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.125.

引用本文的文献

1
The TPP Is Dead, Long Live the TPP? A Response to Recent Commentaries.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》已死,《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》万岁?对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):245-247. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.12.

本文引用的文献

1
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
2
Trade policy and public health.贸易政策与公共卫生。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:325-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122739. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
3
The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change.健康不平等的政治根源:变革的前景。
Lancet. 2014 Feb 15;383(9917):630-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62407-1. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
4
Trade and social determinants of health.贸易与健康的社会决定因素。
Lancet. 2009 Feb 7;373(9662):502-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61777-8. Epub 2009 Jan 21.