• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我确信我们让这项研究变得更好了……”:智障成年人以及患者和公众参与健康研究中的家长照顾者的经历。

'I'm sure we made it a better study…': Experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities and parent carers of patient and public involvement in a health research study.

作者信息

Beighton Carole, Victor Christina, Carey Iain M, Hosking Fay, DeWilde Steve, Cook Derek G, Manners Paula, Harris Tess

机构信息

St George's University of London, UK.

Brunel University London, UK.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil. 2019 Mar;23(1):78-96. doi: 10.1177/1744629517723485. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1177/1744629517723485
PMID:28812949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6383106/
Abstract

Patient and public involvement is considered integral to health research in the United Kingdom; however, studies documenting the involvement of adults with intellectual disabilities and parent carers in health research studies are scarce. Through group interviews, this study explored the perspectives and experiences of a group of adults with intellectual disabilities and a group of parent carers about their collaborative/participatory involvement in a 3-year study which explored the effectiveness of annual health checks for adults with intellectual disabilities. Thematic analysis identified five key themes consistent across both groups; authenticity of participation, working together, generating new outcome measures, dissemination of findings and involvement in future research. Although reported anecdotally rather than originating from the analysis, increased self-confidence is also discussed. The groups' unique perspectives led to insights not previously considered by the research team which led to important recommendations to inform healthcare practice.

摘要

患者及公众参与在英国被视为健康研究不可或缺的一部分;然而,记录成年智障人士及其家长照顾者参与健康研究的研究却很稀少。通过小组访谈,本研究探讨了一组成年智障人士和一组家长照顾者对于他们协作/参与一项为期3年的研究的观点和经历,该研究探索了针对成年智障人士进行年度健康检查的有效性。主题分析确定了两组共有的五个关键主题;参与的真实性、共同协作、生成新的结果指标、研究结果的传播以及参与未来研究。尽管增加自信心是通过轶事报道而非分析得出,但也进行了讨论。这些群体独特的观点带来了研究团队之前未考虑到的见解,从而产生了为医疗保健实践提供参考的重要建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1058/6383106/1701af92ed18/10.1177_1744629517723485-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1058/6383106/1701af92ed18/10.1177_1744629517723485-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1058/6383106/1701af92ed18/10.1177_1744629517723485-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
'I'm sure we made it a better study…': Experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities and parent carers of patient and public involvement in a health research study.“我确信我们让这项研究变得更好了……”:智障成年人以及患者和公众参与健康研究中的家长照顾者的经历。
J Intellect Disabil. 2019 Mar;23(1):78-96. doi: 10.1177/1744629517723485. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
Transition from child to adult health services: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of families of young adults with intellectual disabilities.从儿童到成人健康服务的过渡:对有智力残疾的年轻成年人的家庭的观点和经验的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jan;29(1-2):195-207. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15077. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
'Cautiously optimistic': Older parent-carers of adults with intellectual disabilities - Responses to the Care Act 2014.“谨慎乐观”:智障成年人的老年父母照顾者——对2014年《照护法案》的回应
J Intellect Disabil. 2019 Sep;23(3):432-445. doi: 10.1177/1744629519870437.
4
"We're all in this together": patient and public involvement and engagement in developing a new psychosocial intervention for adults with an intellectual disability who display aggressive challenging behaviour.“我们同舟共济”:患者及公众参与并投身于为表现出具有攻击性挑战行为的成年智障人士开发一种新的社会心理干预措施。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 6;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00675-6.
5
An exploration of the participation of people with intellectual disabilities in research-a structured interview survey.对智障人士参与研究情况的探索——一项结构化访谈调查
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):942-947. doi: 10.1111/jar.12453. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
6
'It's our everyday life' - The perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway.“这就是我们的日常生活”——挪威智障人士的观点。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jun;24(2):143-157. doi: 10.1177/1744629518774174. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
8
Family carers' experiences of participating in a weight management programme for overweight children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: An exploratory study.照顾者参与针对超重智障儿童和青少年的体重管理计划的体验:一项探索性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):388-399. doi: 10.1111/jan.13845. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
9
Tolerating Uncertainty: Perceptions of the Future for Ageing Parent Carers and Their Adult Children with Intellectual Disabilities.容忍不确定性:智障老年照料者及其成年子女对未来的认知
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 Jan;30(1):84-96. doi: 10.1111/jar.12221. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
The experience of carers in supporting people with intellectual disabilities through the process of bereavement: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.照顾者在丧亲过程中支持智力残疾人士的体验:一种阐释现象学分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 May;26(3):186-94. doi: 10.1111/jar.12025.

引用本文的文献

1
"We're all in this together": patient and public involvement and engagement in developing a new psychosocial intervention for adults with an intellectual disability who display aggressive challenging behaviour.“我们同舟共济”:患者及公众参与并投身于为表现出具有攻击性挑战行为的成年智障人士开发一种新的社会心理干预措施。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 6;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00675-6.
2
Understanding disability from a secondary data lens perspective: Evidence from consultations with members of the public with disabilities in the UK.从二手数据视角理解残疾:来自与英国残疾公众成员协商的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0318409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318409. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting.患者及护理人员参与方面错失的影响机会:一项关于研究优先级设定的混合方法案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 4;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0007-6. eCollection 2015.
2
Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study.探索学者对与智力残疾者开展包容性健康研究的设计、方法、特征和结果的看法:一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 18;6(8):e011861. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011861.
3
Evaluating Process and Outcomes of Public Involvement in Applied Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Systematic Review.
评估公众参与应用健康与社会关怀研究的过程及成果:一项快速系统综述
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70160. doi: 10.1111/hex.70160.
4
Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique.运用名义群体技术探索消费者参与卫生服务研究的障碍及解决方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 11;10(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00604-z.
5
Meaningful Social Inclusion and Mental Well-Being Among Autistic Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Protocol for a Community-Based Mixed Methods Study.自闭症青少年和新兴成年人中有意义的社会融入与心理健康:一项基于社区的混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 14;13:e52658. doi: 10.2196/52658.
6
People with intellectual disabilities' experiences of primary care health checks, screenings and GP consultations: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.智障人士的初级保健健康检查、筛查及全科医生诊疗经历:一项系统综述与元民族志研究
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Apr 5;70(2):184-200. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2056402. eCollection 2024.
7
Promoting Healthy Behaviors Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Intellectual Disability: Protocol for Developing a Digital Intervention With Co-Design Workshops.促进智障青少年和青年的健康行为:通过协同设计工作坊开发数字干预措施的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 28;12:e47877. doi: 10.2196/47877.
8
Including people with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities in research and evaluation teams: A scoping review of the empirical knowledge base.将智力和其他认知障碍者纳入研究与评估团队:实证知识库的范围综述
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul 18:17446295231189912. doi: 10.1177/17446295231189912.
9
Low degree of patient involvement in contemporary surgical research: A scoping review.患者参与当代外科研究程度较低:范围综述。
J Postgrad Med. 2023 Jul-Sep;69(3):153-158. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_83_23.
10
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
Do health checks for adults with intellectual disability reduce emergency hospital admissions? Evaluation of a natural experiment.
对成年智障人士进行健康检查是否能减少急诊住院人数?一项自然实验的评估。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jan;71(1):52-58. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207557. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Mortality Among Adults With Intellectual Disability in England: Comparisons With the General Population.英格兰成年智障者的死亡率:与普通人群的比较。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1483-90. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303240. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
6
Health characteristics and consultation patterns of people with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional database study in English general practice.智力残疾者的健康特征与咨询模式:一项英国全科医疗的横断面数据库研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):e264-70. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684301. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
Service user involvement: impact and participation: a survey of service user and staff perspectives.服务使用者参与:影响与参与度:一项关于服务使用者和工作人员观点的调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 25;14:491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0491-7.
9
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
10
Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.探索公众参与健康和社会护理研究背后价值观的共识与冲突领域:一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 10;4(1):e004217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004217.