Crooks Valorie A, Ormond Meghann, Jin Ki Nam
Department of Geography RCB 7227, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6 Canada.
Cultural Geography Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 47, Wageningen, 6700 AA The Netherlands.
BMC Proc. 2017 Jul 13;11(Suppl 8):6. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0075-8. eCollection 2017.
In October 2016, the Global Healthcare Policy and Management Forum was held at Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. The goal of the forum was to discuss the role of the state in regulating and supporting the development of medical tourism. Forum attendees came from 10 countries. In this short report article, we identify key lessons from the forum that can inform the direction of future scholarly engagement with medical tourism. In so doing, we reference on-going scholarly debates about this global health services practice that have appeared in multiple venues, including this very journal. Key questions for future research emerging from the forum include: who should be meaningfully involved in identifying and defining categories of those travelling across borders for health services and what risks exist if certain voices are underrepresented in such a process; who does and does not 'count' as a medical tourist and what are the implications of such quantitative assessments; why have researchers not been able to address pressing knowledge gaps regarding the health equity impacts of medical tourism; and how do national-level polices and initiatives shape the ways in which medical tourism is unfolding in specific local centres and clinics? This short report as an important time capsule that summarises the current state of medical tourism research knowledge as articulated by the thought leaders in attendance at the forum while also pushing for research growth.
2016年10月,全球医疗保健政策与管理论坛在韩国首尔的延世大学举行。该论坛的目标是讨论国家在监管和支持医疗旅游发展方面的作用。论坛与会者来自10个国家。在这篇简短的报道文章中,我们确定了该论坛的关键经验教训,这些经验教训可为未来医学旅游学术研究的方向提供参考。在此过程中,我们参考了在多个场所出现的关于这种全球卫生服务实践的学术辩论,包括本期刊。该论坛提出的未来研究关键问题包括:在确定和界定跨境寻求医疗服务者的类别时,哪些人应切实参与其中,如果某些声音在此过程中代表性不足会存在哪些风险;谁算作医疗游客,谁不算,这种量化评估有何影响;为什么研究人员未能填补有关医疗旅游对健康公平影响的紧迫知识空白;以及国家层面的政策和举措如何塑造医疗旅游在特定地方中心和诊所的发展方式?这份简短的报告是一个重要的时间胶囊,总结了出席论坛的思想领袖所阐述的医学旅游研究知识的现状,同时也推动研究的发展。