Suppr超能文献

非监管兽医临床研究的质量保证与最佳研究实践

Quality assurance and best research practices for non-regulated veterinary clinical studies.

作者信息

Davies R, London C, Lascelles B, Conzemius M

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2017 Aug 16;13(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1153-x.

Abstract

Veterinary clinical trials generate data that advance the transfer of knowledge from clinical research to clinical practice in human and veterinary settings. The translational success of non-regulated and regulated veterinary clinical studies is dependent upon the reliability and reproducibility of the data generated. Clinician-scientists that conduct veterinary clinical studies would benefit from a commitment to research quality assurance and best practices throughout all non-regulated and regulated research environments. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidance documents from the FDA provides principles and procedures designed to safeguard data integrity, reliability and reproducibility. While these documents maybe excessive for clinical studies not intended for regulatory oversight it is important to remember that research builds on research. Thus, the quality and accuracy of all data and inference generated throughout the research enterprise remains vulnerable to the impact of potentially unreliable data generated by the lowest performing contributors. The purpose of this first of a series of statement papers is to outline and reference specific quality control and quality assurance procedures that should, at least in part, be incorporated into all veterinary clinical studies.

摘要

兽医临床试验所产生的数据推动了知识从临床研究向人类和兽医临床实践的转化。非规范化和规范化兽医临床研究的转化成功取决于所产生数据的可靠性和可重复性。开展兽医临床研究的临床科学家将受益于在所有非规范化和规范化研究环境中对研究质量保证和最佳实践的承诺。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的《药物临床试验质量管理规范》(GCP)指导文件提供了旨在保障数据完整性、可靠性和可重复性的原则和程序。虽然这些文件对于不打算接受监管监督的临床研究可能过于繁琐,但重要的是要记住研究是建立在研究基础之上的。因此,整个研究企业所产生的所有数据和推断的质量和准确性仍然容易受到表现最差的参与者所产生的潜在不可靠数据的影响。这一系列声明文件中的第一篇的目的是概述并引用特定的质量控制和质量保证程序,这些程序至少应部分纳入所有兽医临床研究中。

相似文献

8
GCP data quality for early clinical development.药物临床试验质量管理规范数据的早期临床开发质量。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1756-63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3267. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
How quality control could save your science.质量控制如何挽救你的科研。
Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):456-8. doi: 10.1038/529456a.
4
The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research.临床前研究中的可重复性经济学
PLoS Biol. 2015 Jun 9;13(6):e1002165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165. eCollection 2015 Jun.
7
Journals unite for reproducibility.期刊为可重复性而联合。
Science. 2014 Nov 7;346(6210):679. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1724.
8
Scientific method: statistical errors.科学方法:统计误差
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):150-2. doi: 10.1038/506150a.
9
Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.政策:NIH 计划提高可重复性。
Nature. 2014 Jan 30;505(7485):612-3. doi: 10.1038/505612a.
10
Who's afraid of peer review?谁害怕同行评审?
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验