Sihn Kyu-Hwan
Dept. of Medical History & Institute for History of Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University.
Uisahak. 2017 Apr;26(1):59-94. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2017.26.59.
This paper examined whether the preventive measures taken by the Hong Kong's colonial authorities were legitimate during the 1894 Hong Kong plague epidemic, and illuminated the correlation between the plague epidemic and hospital space in Hong Kong in the late 19th century. The quarantine measures taken by the colonial authorities were neither a clear-cut victory for Western medicine nor for a rational quarantine based on scientific medical knowledge. Hong Kong's medical officials based on the miasma theory, and focused only on house-to-house inspections and forced quarantine or isolation, without encouraging people to wear masks and without conducting disinfection. Even after Hong Kong plague spread, the Hong Kong's colonial authorities were not interested in what plague bacilli were, but in where they were to be found and how to prevent and control an outbreak of the disease. The germ theory brought significant changes to the disease classification system. Until the 1890s, Hong Kong's colonial authority had classified cause of death mainly on the basis of symptoms, infectious diseases, parts of the body and diseases of systems. Microbiological analysis of the cause of death in Hong Kong was started by Hunter, a bacteriologist, in 1902. He used bacteriological tests with a microscope to analyze the cause of death. New disease recognition and medical recognition brought large changes to hospital space as well. In particular, from the 1880s to the early 1900s, Western medical circles witnessed shifts from miasma theory to the germ theory, thereby influencing Hong Kong's hospital spaces. As the germ theory took ground in Hong Kong in 1894, the bacteriological laboratory and isolation ward became inevitable facilities, and hospital space were reorganized accordingly. However, the colonial authorities and local elites' strategy was different. As a government bacteriologist, Hunter established a central facility to unify several laboratories and to manage urban space from ouside the hospital. On the contrary, the Tungwah Hospital tried to transform hospital space with isolation ward and Receiving Ward System as the eclectic form of Chinese and Western medicine. The 1894 Hong Kong plague promoted the introduction of germ theory and the reorganization of hospital space.
本文探讨了1894年香港鼠疫疫情期间香港殖民当局采取的预防措施是否合理,并阐明了19世纪末香港鼠疫疫情与医院空间之间的关联。殖民当局采取的检疫措施既不是西医的完胜,也不是基于科学医学知识的合理检疫。香港的医务人员基于瘴气理论,只专注于挨家挨户检查以及强制检疫或隔离,既不鼓励人们戴口罩,也不进行消毒。即使在香港鼠疫传播之后,香港殖民当局也不关心鼠疫杆菌是什么,而是关心在哪里能找到它们以及如何预防和控制疾病爆发。病菌理论给疾病分类系统带来了重大变化。直到19世纪90年代,香港殖民当局主要根据症状、传染病、身体部位和系统疾病来分类死因。1902年,细菌学家亨特开始对香港的死因进行微生物分析。他使用显微镜进行细菌学检测来分析死因。新的疾病认知和医学认知也给医院空间带来了巨大变化。特别是在19世纪80年代到20世纪初,西方医学界见证了从瘴气理论到病菌理论的转变,从而影响了香港的医院空间。随着病菌理论在1894年在香港站稳脚跟,细菌学实验室和隔离病房成为必不可少的设施,医院空间也相应地进行了重组。然而,殖民当局和当地精英的策略有所不同。作为政府细菌学家,亨特建立了一个中央设施,将几个实验室统一起来,并从医院外部管理城市空间。相反,东华医院试图以隔离病房和接收病房系统作为中西医结合的形式来改造医院空间。1894年的香港鼠疫促进了病菌理论的引入和医院空间的重组。