• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“适宜的土壤”:第三次鼠疫大流行初期的城市滋生地

A 'Suitable Soil': Plague's Urban Breeding Grounds at the Dawn of the Third Pandemic.

作者信息

Lynteris Christos

出版信息

Med Hist. 2017 Jul;61(3):343-357. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2017.32.

DOI:10.1017/mdh.2017.32
PMID:28604289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5471971/
Abstract

A pressing question during the first half-decade of the third plague pandemic (1894-9) was what was a 'suitable soil' for the disease. The question related to plague's perceived ability to disappear from a given city only to reappear at some future point; a phenomenon that became central to scientific investigations of the disease. However, rather than this simply having a metaphorical meaning, the debate around plague's 'suitable soil' actually concerned the material reality of the soil itself. The prevalence of plague in the working-class neighbourhood of Taipingshan during the first major outbreak of the pandemic, in 1894 in Hong Kong, led to an extensive debate regarding the ability of the soil to harbour and even spread the disease. Involving experiments, which were seen as able to procure evidence for or against the demolition or even torching of the area, scientific and administrative concerns over the soil rendered it an unstable yet highly productive epistemic thing. The spread of plague to India further fuelled concerns over the ability of the soil to act as the medium of the disease's so-called true recrudescence. Besides high-profile scientific debates, hands-on experiments on purifying the soil of infected houses by means of highly intrusive methods allowed scientists and administrators to act upon and further solidify plague's supposed invisibility in the urban terrain. Rather than being a short-lived, moribund object of epidemiological concern, this paper will demonstrate that the soil played a crucial role in the development of plague as a scientifically knowable and actionable category for modern medicine.

摘要

在第三次鼠疫大流行的头五年(1894 - 1899年),一个紧迫的问题是,什么样的“适宜土壤”适合这种疾病滋生。这个问题与鼠疫被认为具有的一种能力有关,即它能够从某一特定城市消失,却在未来某个时间再度出现;这一现象成为了该疾病科学研究的核心。然而,围绕鼠疫“适宜土壤”的争论并非仅仅具有隐喻意义,实际上它关乎土壤本身的物质现实。1894年香港鼠疫首次大爆发期间,太平山工人阶级聚居区鼠疫肆虐,引发了一场广泛的争论,焦点是土壤滋生甚至传播疾病的能力。这场争论涉及一些实验,这些实验被视为能够为拆除甚至焚烧该区域提供支持或反对的证据,科学界和行政部门对土壤的担忧使得它成为了一个不稳定却极具成效的认知对象。鼠疫蔓延至印度,进一步加剧了人们对土壤作为疾病所谓真正复发媒介能力的担忧。除了备受瞩目的科学辩论,通过高度侵入性方法净化受感染房屋土壤的实际操作实验,让科学家和行政人员能够采取行动,并进一步强化了鼠疫在城市环境中难以察觉的观念。本文将证明,土壤并非只是流行病学关注的一个短暂、垂死的对象,而是在鼠疫发展成为现代医学中一个可科学认知且可采取行动的类别过程中发挥了关键作用。

相似文献

1
A 'Suitable Soil': Plague's Urban Breeding Grounds at the Dawn of the Third Pandemic.“适宜的土壤”:第三次鼠疫大流行初期的城市滋生地
Med Hist. 2017 Jul;61(3):343-357. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2017.32.
2
Reorganizing Hospital Space: The 1894 Plague Epidemic in Hong Kong and the Germ Theory.重组医院空间:1894年香港鼠疫疫情与细菌学说
Uisahak. 2017 Apr;26(1):59-94. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2017.26.59.
3
: The History of a Contested Plague Pathology.一场备受争议的瘟疫病理学史
Bull Hist Med. 2019;93(1):55-81. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2019.0002.
4
Hong Kong Junk: Plague and the Economy of Chinese Things.《香港舢板:鼠疫与中国物品经济》
Bull Hist Med. 2016 Spring;90(1):32-60. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2016.0011.
5
Research on Tropical Medicine and Germ Theory in Colonial Hong Kong: Focusing on Malaria and Plague Prevention.香港殖民地时期热带医学与细菌理论研究:以疟疾与鼠疫防治为中心
Uisahak. 2024 Aug;33(2):477-502. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.477.
6
The plague's last visit?鼠疫的最后一次到访?
Lancet. 1970 Mar 14;1(7646):558.
7
Plague, rats, and ships The realisation of the infection routes of plague.鼠疫、老鼠与船只:鼠疫感染途径的认知
Dan Medicinhist Arbog. 2016;44:101-133.
8
[The plague in Vietnam: history and inventory of collected fleas (insecta, Siphonaptera) in the inhabited zones].[越南的鼠疫:居民区收集跳蚤(昆虫纲,蚤目)的历史与清单]
Parasite. 2002 Mar;9(1):3-10. doi: 10.1051/parasite/20020913.
9
Yersinia pestis DNA from skeletal remains from the 6(th) century AD reveals insights into Justinianic Plague.从公元 6 世纪骨骼遗骸中提取的鼠疫耶尔森氏菌 DNA 揭示了查士丁尼瘟疫的相关信息。
PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(5):e1003349. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003349. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
No evidence for persistent natural plague reservoirs in historical and modern Europe.在历史和现代的欧洲,没有鼠疫持续存在的自然疫源地的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 20;119(51):e2209816119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209816119. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Different characteristics of the soil in marmot habitats might be one of the factors that influcting prevalent in which than pikas.旱獭栖息地土壤的不同特征可能是影响其患病率高于鼠兔的因素之一。 不过你提供的英文原文“influcting”拼写有误,正确的可能是“influencing” 。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Oct 18;15:1489125. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1489125. eCollection 2024.
2
Of rats and children: plague, malaria, and the early history of disease reservoirs (1898-1930).论老鼠与儿童:鼠疫、疟疾与疾病储存宿主的早期历史(1898-1930 年)。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2024 Oct 22;46(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s40656-024-00633-7.
3
The complex genomic diversity of on the long-term plague foci in Qinghai-Tibet plateau.青藏高原长期鼠疫疫源地的复杂基因组多样性。 不过你提供的原文“The complex genomic diversity of on the long-term plague foci in Qinghai-Tibet plateau.”表述似乎不完整,“of”后面缺少具体内容。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 28;13(8):e10387. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10387. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses in soil: An environmental outlook.土壤中的 SARS-CoV-2 和其他病毒:环境展望。
Environ Res. 2021 Jul;198:111297. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111297. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Soil pathogens that may potentially cause pandemics, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronaviruses.可能引发大流行的土壤病原体,包括严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)冠状病毒。
Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2020 Oct;17:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Yersinia pestis: the Natural History of Plague.鼠疫耶尔森菌:鼠疫的自然史。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Dec 9;34(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00044-19. Print 2020 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Hong Kong Junk: Plague and the Economy of Chinese Things.《香港舢板:鼠疫与中国物品经济》
Bull Hist Med. 2016 Spring;90(1):32-60. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2016.0011.
2
Cargo, "infection," and the logic of quarantine in the nineteenth century.货物、“感染”与19世纪的检疫逻辑。
Bull Hist Med. 2014 Spring;88(1):75-101. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2014.0018.
3
Plague in the Far East.远东地区的鼠疫
Br Med J. 1896 Aug 22;2(1860):460.
4
City of plagues: disease, poverty, and deviance in San Francisco. [Review of: Craddock, S. City of plagues: disease, poverty, and deviance in San Francisco. Minneapolis: U. of Minnesota Pr., 2000].
J Am Hist. 2002;89(1):259-60.
5
[EXPERIMENTAL PRESERVATION OF PLAGUE IN SOIL].[鼠疫在土壤中的实验性保存]
Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1963 Nov-Dec;56:1168-82.
6
The microscopist of modern life.现代生活的显微镜使用者。
Osiris. 2003;18:150-70. doi: 10.1086/649382.
7
Bubonic plague in nineteenth-century China.19世纪中国的腺鼠疫
Mod China. 1988;14(2):107-55. doi: 10.1177/009770048801400201.
8
Hong Kong, 1894: the role of James A Lowson in the controversial discovery of the plague bacillus.1894年,香港:詹姆斯·A·洛森在鼠疫杆菌这一颇具争议的发现中所扮演的角色。
Lancet. 1997 Jul 5;350(9070):59-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01438-4.
9
Not what, but where: bubonic plague and the reception of germ theories in Hong Kong and Calcutta, 1894-1897.不是什么,而是哪里:黑死病以及1894年至1897年香港和加尔各答对病菌理论的接受情况
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1997 Jan;52(1):81-113. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/52.1.81.
10
Diagnosis of plaque: an analysis of the Yersin-Kitasato controversy.斑块的诊断:对耶尔森-北里争议的分析。
Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Sep;40(3):633-51. doi: 10.1128/br.40.3.633-651.1976.