Odongo-Aginya Emmanuel Igwaro, Olia Alex, Luwa Kilama Justin, Nagayasu Eiji, Auma Anna Mary, Egitat Geoffrey, Mwesigwa Gerald, Ogino Yoshitaka, Kimura Eisaku, Horii Toshihiro
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P.O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gulu University, P.O.Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Trop Med Health. 2017 Aug 15;45:20. doi: 10.1186/s41182-017-0060-y. eCollection 2017.
A prevalence study of infection was carried out in 2014 at 4 study sites in northern Uganda using antigen and microfilaria tests. Each study site consists of a primary school and surrounding communities. These sites are inside the filariasis endemic area and have been covered by mass drug administration under the national elimination programme. However, no prevalence study had been conducted there before the present study. Without information on past and present endemicity levels, our study was meant to be an independent third-party investigation to know the latest filariasis situation.
A total of 982 people including 570 schoolchildren (7-19 years) and 412 community people (7-25 years) were examined, all of them for filarial antigen and 695 for microfilariae. The study revealed that all subjects were negative by both methods.
It was considered that annual mass drug administrations together with anti-malarial activities such as indoor residual spraying had contributed to the reduction of the filarial infection. However, based on the past data obtained near our study sites, we cannot exclude the possibility that filarial prevalence rates in our study sites were very low or even zero originally. During the study, we encountered several patients with lower leg edema and pachydermic (elephant skin-like), mossy skin lesion of the foot. Judging from clinical features and bare-footed life-style of people in the area, non-filarial elephantiasis, possibly podoconiosis, was suspected. This elephantiasis has been reported in areas where filariasis is not endemic.
2014年,在乌干达北部的4个研究地点开展了一项感染患病率研究,采用抗原和微丝蚴检测方法。每个研究地点包括一所小学及其周边社区。这些地点位于丝虫病流行区,并且已在国家消除计划下接受了群体药物给药。然而,在本研究之前,那里尚未进行过患病率研究。由于缺乏过去和当前流行程度的信息,我们的研究旨在作为一项独立的第三方调查,以了解丝虫病的最新情况。
总共检查了982人,其中包括570名学童(7至19岁)和412名社区居民(7至25岁),所有人都接受了丝虫抗原检测,695人接受了微丝蚴检测。研究表明,两种检测方法的所有受试者结果均为阴性。
据认为,年度群体药物给药以及诸如室内滞留喷洒等抗疟疾活动有助于减少丝虫感染。然而,根据在我们研究地点附近获得的过去数据,我们不能排除我们研究地点的丝虫患病率最初非常低甚至为零的可能性。在研究期间,我们遇到了几名小腿水肿以及足部有厚皮样(象皮样)、苔藓样皮肤病变的患者。从该地区人群的临床特征和赤足生活方式判断,怀疑是非丝虫性象皮肿,可能是足分支菌病。这种象皮肿在丝虫病非流行地区已有报道。