• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《美学鼻整形术结果评估乌得勒支问卷》德文版(D-OAR)的信效度

Reliability and validity of the German version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (D-OAR).

作者信息

Spiekermann Christoph, Rudack Claudia, Stenner Markus

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3893-3898. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4706-5. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-017-4706-5
PMID:28815302
Abstract

The outcome of aesthetic rhinoplasty is determined by the patient's subjective satisfaction with the nasal appearance which is difficult to assess. The Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (OAR) is a brief and reliable instrument to assess the influence of the subjective nasal appearance on quality of life in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty. Preoperative application of this questionnaire reveals important aspects and possible disturbances of the body image which could be negative predictors concerning the result. On the other hand, it represents an appropriate tool to assess the postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the adapted German version of the OAR (D-OAR). The adaption of the OAR to German language was performed by a forward and backward translation process. Patients undergoing rhinoplasty were asked to complete the D-OAR preoperatively, 1, 3 and 12 months after procedure and healthy volunteers without any nasal complaints served as controls to test validity, reliability and responsiveness. An excellent internal consistency, a good test-retest reliability and good inter-item and item-total correlations demonstrated a good reliability of the D-OAR. The convincing validity of the adapted version was proven by an excellent discriminant and a sufficient content validity. Significant differences between pre- and postoperative D-OAR scores revealed a good responsiveness of the instrument. Hence, with a sufficient validity, reliability and sensitivity to changes, the D-OAR is a short and helpful instrument to assess the subjective perception of the nasal appearance in German patients.

摘要

鼻整形术的效果取决于患者对鼻部外观的主观满意度,而这很难评估。《乌得勒支鼻整形术结果评估问卷》(OAR)是一种简短且可靠的工具,用于评估主观鼻部外观对接受鼻整形术患者生活质量的影响。术前使用该问卷可揭示身体形象的重要方面以及可能存在的干扰因素,这些因素可能是手术结果的负面预测指标。另一方面,它也是评估术后效果的合适工具。本研究的目的是确定改编后的德语版OAR(D-OAR)的有效性、可靠性和反应性。OAR的德语改编是通过正向和反向翻译过程完成的。接受鼻整形术的患者被要求在术前、术后1个月、3个月和12个月完成D-OAR,没有任何鼻部问题的健康志愿者作为对照组,以测试其有效性、可靠性和反应性。良好的内部一致性、良好的重测信度以及良好的项目间和项目与总分的相关性表明D-OAR具有良好的可靠性。改编版出色的区分效度和充分的内容效度证明了其令人信服的有效性。术前和术后D-OAR评分的显著差异表明该工具具有良好的反应性。因此,D-OAR具有足够的有效性、可靠性和对变化的敏感性,是评估德国患者对鼻部外观主观感受的一种简短且有用的工具。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the German version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (D-OAR).《美学鼻整形术结果评估乌得勒支问卷》德文版(D-OAR)的信效度
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3893-3898. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4706-5. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
Adaption and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale in German language (D-NOSE).鼻腔阻塞症状评估量表(D-NOSE)德语版的调适与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 4;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1004-x.
3
Influence of the Subjective Body Image on the Outcome of Functional Rhinoplasty.主观体像对功能性鼻整形术结果的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1239-2. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Discrepancy of the subjective perception of the nasal appearance between independent individuals and patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty (fRPL).接受功能性鼻整形术 (fRPL) 的患者与独立个体之间对鼻部外观的主观感知存在差异。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):191-197. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07504-6. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D).功能性鼻整形术中的生活质量:鼻整形术结果评估德文版(ROE-D)
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3920-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Development and Validation of a Brief Four-Component Questionnaire to Identify Patient's Motivation to Undergo Functional Rhinoplasty.用于识别患者接受功能性鼻整形手术动机的简短四要素问卷的开发与验证
Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Aug;34(4):350-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1660835. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
The Portuguese version of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty": validation and clinical application.《用于鼻整形美容效果评估的乌得勒支问卷》葡萄牙语版本:验证与临床应用
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;85(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
8
The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application.土耳其版隆鼻术结果评估问卷:验证和临床应用。
Balkan Med J. 2019 Feb 28;36(2):129-133. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2018.2018.1129. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty.测量美学鼻整形术后主观鼻部外观感知的简短实用问卷的优势。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):913e-923e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000434403.83692.95.
10
Patient satisfaction in Caucasian and Mediterranean open rhinoplasty using the tongue-in-groove technique: prospective statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance following aesthetic rhinoplasty.采用榫槽技术的白种人和地中海人种开放式鼻整形术中的患者满意度:对美容鼻整形术后主观身体形象与鼻外观变化的前瞻性统计分析。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Apr;125(4):831-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.25037. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Persian Version of Utrecht Questionnaire for Evaluation of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Outcomes: Translation and Validation.用于评估鼻整形美容效果的乌得勒支问卷波斯语版本:翻译与验证
World J Plast Surg. 2020 May;9(2):141-145. doi: 10.29252/wjps.9.2.141.
2
Assessment of Rhinoplasty Outcomes with FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module: Norwegian Linguistic Validation and Clinical Application in 243 Patients.使用 FACE-Q 鼻整形模块评估鼻整形效果:挪威语语言验证及对 243 例患者的临床应用
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2448. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002448. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Are Austrian practitioners ready to use medical apps? Results of a validation study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Nasal Obstruction after Different Nasal Surgeries Using Acoustic Rhinometry and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale.使用鼻声反射仪和鼻阻塞症状评估量表评估不同鼻部手术后鼻阻塞的效果。
World J Plast Surg. 2016 Sep;5(3):236-243.
2
Rhinoplasty as a medicalized phenomenon: a 25-center survey on quality of life before and after cosmetic rhinoplasty.作为一种医学化现象的隆鼻术:一项关于美容隆鼻术前和术后生活质量的25中心调查。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;38(4):615-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0323-5. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
3
Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty.
奥地利从业者是否准备好使用医疗应用程序?验证研究的结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0811-2.
4
Readiness to use telemonitoring in diabetes care: a cross-sectional study among Austrian practitioners.使用远程监测进行糖尿病护理的准备情况:奥地利从业者的横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 29;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0746-7.
5
Adaption and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale in German language (D-NOSE).鼻腔阻塞症状评估量表(D-NOSE)德语版的调适与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 4;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1004-x.
测量美学鼻整形术后主观鼻部外观感知的简短实用问卷的优势。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):913e-923e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000434403.83692.95.
4
The body dysmorphic disorder patient: to perform rhinoplasty or not?身体变形障碍患者:是否进行隆鼻手术?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Sep;271(9):2355-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2792-6. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
5
Vertical dome division: a quality-of-life outcome study.垂直穹隆分割:一项生活质量结局研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 May;148(5):758-63. doi: 10.1177/0194599813480629. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
6
The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation.鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)量表对鼻中隔偏曲患者的有效性。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012 Jun;39(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.用于跨文化医疗保健研究的工具或量表的翻译、改编和验证:清晰易用的指南。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
8
Test reliability; its meaning and determination.测试可靠性:其含义与测定
Psychometrika. 1947 Mar;12(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02289289.
9
Outcomes of septoplasty in young adults: the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness study.鼻中隔成形术治疗青年患者的疗效:鼻腔梗阻鼻中隔成形术有效性研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.02.023. Epub 2009 May 5.
10
Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research.(准)实验设计中统计学显著变化与相关或重要变化的比较:卫生服务研究中估计干预相关变化幅度的一些概念和方法问题。
Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.65. Epub 2002 Dec 17.