• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其版隆鼻术结果评估问卷:验证和临床应用。

The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey

Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Fatih Medical Park Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey

出版信息

Balkan Med J. 2019 Feb 28;36(2):129-133. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2018.2018.1129. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

DOI:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2018.2018.1129
PMID:30417832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6409958/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An assessment of rhinoplasty from the patient’s perspective, in terms of satisfaction and quality of life, is quite important because these are the predominant factors indicating the success of rhinoplasty.

AIMS

To translate the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation into Turkish and then validate the new version for use in Turkish patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Validation study.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 participants who were able to read and write Turkish and underwent primary rhinoplasty. The control group consisted of 58 healthy volunteers with no need for aesthetic or functional nasal surgery. The reliability of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T was analyzed according to its internal consistency and test-retest reproducibility. Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T scores between the patient and control groups. Responsiveness and sensitivity to changes in rhinoplasty outcomes were analyzed by comparing the patients’ pre- and postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T scores.

RESULTS

The scores for questions 1-6 of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T, as well as the total scores, were significantly lower in the patient group than in the control group (all p<0.05). In the patient group, the scores for questions 1-6 of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T, as well as the total scores, were higher postoperatively than preoperatively (all p<0.05). The scores for each Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T question, as well as the total scores, did not differ significantly with respect to test-retest reproducibility (all p>0.05). The internal consistency of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T was high, as evidenced by Cronbach’s α values of 0.887 preoperatively and 0.798 postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T constitutes a validated instrument with which to measure rhinoplasty outcomes among Turkish patients.

摘要

背景

从患者的角度评估鼻整形术,包括满意度和生活质量,这是非常重要的,因为这些是表明鼻整形术成功的主要因素。

目的

将 Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation 翻译成土耳其语,然后验证新版本在土耳其患者中的使用。

研究设计

验证研究。

方法

我们招募了 30 名能够读写土耳其语并接受初次鼻整形术的参与者。对照组由 58 名健康志愿者组成,他们不需要进行美容或功能性鼻手术。根据内部一致性和测试-重测可重复性分析 Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 的可靠性。通过比较患者和对照组的 Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 评分来计算判别有效性。通过比较患者术前和术后的 Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 评分来分析对鼻整形术结果变化的响应性和敏感性。

结果

Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 的问题 1-6 的得分以及总分在患者组中明显低于对照组(均 p<0.05)。在患者组中,Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 的问题 1-6 的得分以及总分术后均高于术前(均 p<0.05)。Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 的每个问题的得分以及总分在测试-重测可重复性方面差异均无统计学意义(均 p>0.05)。Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 的内部一致性较高,术前 Cronbach's α 值为 0.887,术后为 0.798。

结论

Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T 是一种经过验证的工具,可用于衡量土耳其患者的鼻整形术结果。

相似文献

1
The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application.土耳其版隆鼻术结果评估问卷:验证和临床应用。
Balkan Med J. 2019 Feb 28;36(2):129-133. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2018.2018.1129. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
2
Reliability and validity of the German version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (D-OAR).《美学鼻整形术结果评估乌得勒支问卷》德文版(D-OAR)的信效度
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3893-3898. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4706-5. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
3
Turkish Validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.《标准化美容与健康鼻科结局调查》的土耳其语验证
Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Aug;35(4):397-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693442. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D).功能性鼻整形术中的生活质量:鼻整形术结果评估德文版(ROE-D)
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3920-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
5
Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire.阿拉伯鼻整形效果评估问卷的验证和临床应用。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Jun;42(6):655-659. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.6.20210038.
6
The Portuguese version of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty": validation and clinical application.《用于鼻整形美容效果评估的乌得勒支问卷》葡萄牙语版本:验证与临床应用
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;85(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
7
Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.验证经改编为巴西葡萄牙语的 Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation(ROE)问卷。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):953-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0539-x. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
8
Prospective Patient-Related Outcome Evaluation of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty Using a Validated Questionnaire.使用经过验证的问卷对二期鼻整形术进行前瞻性患者相关结局评估。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Jul;54(4):436-441. doi: 10.1597/14-168. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
A Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Instrument for Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty: The RHINO Scale.一种用于美容和功能性鼻整形术的综合生活质量评估工具:RHINO量表。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Feb 4;4(2):e611. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000592. eCollection 2016 Feb.
10
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological Comparison of Piezosurgery and Classical Osteotomies in Rhinoplasty.鼻整形术中压电手术与传统截骨术的放射学比较
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05191-2.
2
Normative Values of Rhinology Questionnaires in Young Adults: A Tool to Identify Candidates for Rhinoplasty.年轻成年人鼻科学问卷的标准值:一种识别鼻整形术候选人的工具。
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(2):170. doi: 10.3390/life15020170.
3
The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.隆鼻术中的隆鼻术效果评估(ROE)问卷:系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4642. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164642.
4
Nasal axis lateralization suture technique in crooked nose.鼻中隔偏曲矫正术中的鼻中隔偏曲缝合技术。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5293-5301. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08740-8. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Development and Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire: An Analytical Study.鼻整形术效果评估(ROE)问卷的开发与验证:一项分析研究。
World J Plast Surg. 2022 Jul;11(2):68-74. doi: 10.52547/wjps.11.2.68.
6
Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty.功能与美学因素对鼻中隔成形术患者满意度的影响
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar;60(1):36-41. doi: 10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire.阿拉伯鼻整形效果评估问卷的验证和临床应用。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Jun;42(6):655-659. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.6.20210038.
8
Rhinoplasty in secondary nasal deformities: Subjective and objective outcome evaluation.二次鼻畸形的鼻整形术:主观与客观结果评估
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;11(2):186-192. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_67_20. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The Portuguese version of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty": validation and clinical application.《用于鼻整形美容效果评估的乌得勒支问卷》葡萄牙语版本:验证与临床应用
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;85(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
Satisfaction in rhinoplasty: the possible impact of anxiety and functional outcome.鼻整形术的满意度:焦虑和功能结果的可能影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;275(3):729-733. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4860-9. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Assessment of satisfaction based on age and gender in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty.基于年龄和性别的功能性与美容性鼻整形手术满意度评估
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;274(7):2809-2812. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4566-z. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty.隆鼻术后患者报告结局指标的系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1807-1811. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4359-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study.隆鼻手术美学与功能效果评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep-Oct;83(5):552-557. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
6
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.开放式鼻中隔成形术患者对评估方法的满意度评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):420-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002321.
7
Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D).功能性鼻整形术中的生活质量:鼻整形术结果评估德文版(ROE-D)
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3920-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.验证经改编为巴西葡萄牙语的 Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation(ROE)问卷。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):953-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0539-x. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire.隆鼻术结局评估(ROE)问卷的正常值。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul-Aug;78(4):76-9. doi: 10.1590/s1808-86942012000400015.
10
Crooked nose: outcome evaluations in rhinoplasty.歪鼻:鼻整形术的结果评估。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jul-Aug;77(4):510-515. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000400016.