Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LTER Zone Atelier Moselle, LIEC (Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux), UMR7360, 54500, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CREGU, GeoRessources lab, UMR7359, 54506, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Oct;24(28):22717-22729. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9840-5. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
In this study, we compared the influence of two different collection methods, filtration (FT) and continuous flow field centrifugation (CFC), on the concentration and the distribution of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in suspended particulate matter (SPM) occurring in river waters. SPM samples were collected simultaneously with FT and CFC from a river during six sampling campaigns over 2 years, covering different hydrological contexts. SPM samples were analyzed to determine the concentration of PACs including 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 11 oxygenated PACs (O-PACs), and 5 nitrogen PACs (N-PACs). Results showed significant differences between the two separation methods. In half of the sampling campaigns, PAC concentrations differed from a factor 2 to 30 comparing FT and CFC-collected SPMs. The PAC distributions were also affected by the separation method. FT-collected SPM were enriched in 2-3 ring PACs whereas CFC-collected SPM had PAC distributions dominated by medium to high molecular weight compounds typical of combustion processes. This could be explained by distinct cut-off threshold of the two separation methods and strongly suggested the retention of colloidal and/or fine matter on glass-fiber filters particularly enriched in low molecular PACs. These differences between FT and CFC were not systematic but rather enhanced by high water flow rates.
在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同的采集方法,过滤(FT)和连续流场离心(CFC),对河流悬浮颗粒物(SPM)中多环芳烃(PACs)的浓度和分布的影响。FT 和 CFC 同时从一条河流中采集 SPM 样品,在 2 年的 6 次采样中,涵盖了不同的水文背景。对 SPM 样品进行了分析,以确定包括 16 种多环芳烃(PAHs)、11 种含氧多环芳烃(O-PACs)和 5 种含氮多环芳烃(N-PACs)在内的 PAC 浓度。结果表明,两种分离方法之间存在显著差异。在一半的采样活动中,FT 和 CFC 采集的 SPM 中,PAC 浓度差异高达 2 到 30 倍。PAC 的分布也受到分离方法的影响。FT 采集的 SPM 富含 2-3 环 PACs,而 CFC 采集的 SPM 则具有典型燃烧过程中高分子量化合物为主的 PAC 分布。这可以用两种分离方法的不同截止阈值来解释,并强烈表明在玻璃纤维滤器上存在胶体和/或细小物质的保留,特别是富含低分子量 PACs。FT 和 CFC 之间的这些差异不是系统性的,而是随着高水流速度而增强。