• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险优势计划受益人的支付方式如何随任期而变化?

How do Medicare Advantage beneficiary payments vary with tenure?

机构信息

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 5600 Fishers Ln, Mailstop 07W41A, Rockville, MD 20857. E-mail:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jun;23(6):372-377.

PMID:28817299
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare how premiums and expected out-of-pocket medical costs (OOPC) vary with the length of time Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries have been enrolled in their plans.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive and fixed effects regression analyses.

METHODS

Using linked administrative enrollment and plan data, we compared the costs of the MA plans that beneficiaries chose with the costs of other plans available to them. We show predicted values adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, disability, individual health risk, presence of mental health diagnoses, health plan quality, relative size of the plan's provider network, and the number of years continuously enrolled in the same plan. To further address the possibility of bias, we included county-level fixed effects and compared results to a beneficiary-level fixed effects model.

RESULTS

We found average spending on premiums and OOPC in enrolled plans exceeded such costs in the lowest-cost plan by $697 in 2013. Beneficiaries who remained in their plans for 6 or more years were most at risk of spending these higher amounts, paying $786 more than they would have spent in the lowest-cost plan compared with $552 for beneficiaries in their first year of enrollment. For each year a beneficiary remained in their same plan, their additional spending in excess of the minimum cost choice increased by roughly $50.

CONCLUSIONS

MA beneficiaries could reduce their exposure to healthcare spending by switching to plans with lower premiums, although there may well be rational reasons for paying costs in excess of those of the lowest-cost plan.

摘要

目的

比较医疗保险优势计划(MA)受益人在其计划中的参保时间长短对保费和预期自付医疗费用(OOPC)的影响。

研究设计

描述性和固定效应回归分析。

方法

我们使用关联的行政登记和计划数据,比较了受益人选择的 MA 计划的成本与他们可获得的其他计划的成本。我们展示了调整年龄、性别、种族/民族、残疾、个人健康风险、心理健康诊断、健康计划质量、计划提供者网络相对规模以及连续参保年限的预测值。为了进一步解决可能存在的偏差,我们纳入了县级固定效应,并将结果与受益人的固定效应模型进行了比较。

结果

我们发现,2013 年,参保计划中的保费和 OOPC 平均支出比最低成本计划高出 697 美元。在计划中参保 6 年或更长时间的受益人面临着支出这些更高金额的最大风险,与选择最低成本计划相比,他们多支付了 786 美元,而参保第一年的受益人则多支付了 552 美元。受益人在同一计划中参保的每一年,他们超出最低成本选择的额外支出增加了约 50 美元。

结论

MA 受益人可以通过选择保费较低的计划来降低他们面临的医疗保健支出风险,尽管支付高于最低成本计划的费用可能有合理的原因。

相似文献

1
How do Medicare Advantage beneficiary payments vary with tenure?医疗保险优势计划受益人的支付方式如何随任期而变化?
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jun;23(6):372-377.
2
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
3
Determinants of Medicare plan choices: are beneficiaries more influenced by premiums or benefits?医疗保险计划选择的决定因素:受益人受保费还是福利的影响更大?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul;21(7):498-504.
4
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
5
Variations in county-level costs between traditional medicare and medicare advantage have implications for premium support.传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划在县级成本上的差异对保费支持有影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):56-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0768.
6
The costs of decedents in the Medicare program: implications for payments to Medicare + Choice plans.医疗保险计划中死者的费用:对向医疗保险 + 选择计划付款的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Feb;39(1):111-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00218.x.
7
Do Medicare Advantage plans select enrollees in higher margin clinical categories?医疗保险优势计划是否会选择利润率更高的临床类别中的参保人?
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.003.
8
Medicare Advantage Financing and Quality in Puerto Rico vs the 50 US States and Washington, DC.波多黎各的医疗保险优势融资与质量与美国 50 个州和华盛顿特区的比较。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Sep 2;3(9):e223073. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3073.
9
The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances.医疗保险优势计划中编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
10
Medicare beneficiary out-of-pocket costs: are Medicare Advantage Plans a better deal?医疗保险受益人的自付费用:医疗保险优势计划是否更划算?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2006 May;19:1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances.医疗保险优势计划中编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9.