Suppr超能文献

基于埃及伊蚊指数评估肯尼亚三大城市登革热和黄热病病毒传播风险

Assessment of risk of dengue and yellow fever virus transmission in three major Kenyan cities based on Stegomyia indices.

作者信息

Agha Sheila B, Tchouassi David P, Bastos Armanda D S, Sang Rosemary

机构信息

International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 17;11(8):e0005858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005858. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Dengue (DEN) and yellow fever (YF) are re-emerging in East Africa, with contributing drivers to this trend being unplanned urbanization and increasingly adaptable anthropophilic Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors. Entomological risk assessment of these diseases remains scarce for much of East Africa and Kenya even in the dengue fever-prone urban coastal areas. Focusing on major cities of Kenya, we compared DEN and YF risk in Kilifi County (DEN-outbreak-prone), and Kisumu and Nairobi Counties (no documented DEN outbreaks). We surveyed water-holding containers for mosquito immature (larvae/pupae) indoors and outdoors from selected houses during the long rains, short rains and dry seasons (100 houses/season) in each County from October 2014-June 2016. House index (HI), Breteau index (BI) and Container index (CI) estimates based on Aedes (Stegomyia) immature infestations were compared by city and season. Aedes aegypti and Aedes bromeliae were the main Stegomyia species with significantly more positive houses outdoors (212) than indoors (88) (n = 900) (χ2 = 60.52, P < 0.0001). Overall, Ae. aegypti estimates of HI (17.3 vs 11.3) and BI (81.6 vs 87.7) were higher in Kilifi and Kisumu, respectively, than in Nairobi (HI, 0.3; BI,13). However, CI was highest in Kisumu (33.1), followed by Kilifi (15.1) then Nairobi (5.1). Aedes bromeliae indices were highest in Kilifi, followed by Kisumu, then Nairobi with HI (4.3, 0.3, 0); BI (21.3, 7, 0.7) and CI (3.3, 3.3, 0.3), at the respective sites. HI and BI for both species were highest in the long rains, compared to the short rains and dry seasons. We found strong positive correlations between the BI and CI, and BI and HI for Ae. aegypti, with the most productive container types being jerricans, drums, used/discarded containers and tyres. On the basis of established vector index thresholds, our findings suggest low-to-medium risk levels for urban YF and high DEN risk for Kilifi and Kisumu, whereas for Nairobi YF risk was low while DEN risk levels were low-to-medium. The study provides a baseline for future vector studies needed to further characterise the observed differential risk patterns by vector potential evaluation. Identified productive containers should be made the focus of community-based targeted vector control programs.

摘要

登革热(DEN)和黄热病(YF)正在东非再度出现,导致这一趋势的因素包括无规划的城市化以及适应性日益增强的嗜人伊蚊(埃及伊蚊)媒介。在东非大部分地区以及肯尼亚,即便在登革热高发的城市沿海地区,对这些疾病的昆虫学风险评估仍然匮乏。我们聚焦于肯尼亚的主要城市,比较了基利菲县(易爆发登革热)、基苏木县和内罗毕县(无登革热爆发记录)的登革热和黄热病风险。在2014年10月至2016年6月期间,我们在每个县的长雨季、短雨季和旱季(每个季节100所房屋),对选定房屋的室内和室外积水容器进行了蚊虫幼虫/蛹调查。根据埃及伊蚊(埃及伊蚊属)幼虫侵扰情况估算的房屋指数(HI)、布雷托指数(BI)和容器指数(CI),按城市和季节进行了比较。埃及伊蚊和凤梨伊蚊是主要的埃及伊蚊属物种,室外阳性房屋(212处)显著多于室内(88处)(n = 900)(χ2 = 60.52,P < 0.0001)。总体而言,埃及伊蚊的HI(基利菲为17.3,基苏木为11.3)和BI(基利菲为81.6,基苏木为87.7)在基利菲和基苏木分别高于内罗毕(HI为0.3;BI为13)。然而,CI在基苏木最高(33.1),其次是基利菲(15.1),然后是内罗毕(5.1)。凤梨伊蚊指数在基利菲最高,其次是基苏木,然后是内罗毕,在各地点的HI分别为(4.3、0.3、0);BI分别为(21.3、7、0.7);CI分别为(3.3、3.3、0.3)。与短雨季和旱季相比,两个物种的HI和BI在长雨季最高。我们发现埃及伊蚊的BI与CI、BI与HI之间存在强正相关,最易滋生蚊虫的容器类型是大罐、桶、用过/丢弃的容器和轮胎。根据既定的媒介指数阈值,我们的研究结果表明城市黄热病风险为低至中等,基利菲和基苏木登革热风险高,而内罗毕黄热病风险低,登革热风险为低至中等。该研究为未来的媒介研究提供了基线,通过媒介潜力评估进一步刻画观察到的不同风险模式。已确定的易滋生蚊虫的容器应成为基于社区的针对性媒介控制项目的重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52c/5574621/336f967db8e9/pntd.0005858.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验