Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
Physical activity is an effective intervention for the prevention and management of chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). However, there is a lack of research to inform the intensity of physical activity that should be recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between substituting 10minutes of sedentary time with either 10minutes of light physical activity (LPA) or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and the CMP prevalence ratio.
Secondary Analysis (November 2015) of data from the Health Survey for England (2008).
2313 adults (≥16years).
Sedentary time, LPA and MVPA were measured using accelerometry. We used isotemporal models to quantify the prevalence ratio for CMP of replacing 10minutes of sedentary time with 10minutes of LPA or MVPA.
The prevalence of CMP in this sample was 17%. The unadjusted prevalence ratio was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97 to 1.01) for LPA and 0.76 (0.70 to 0.84) for MVPA. The fully adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.02) for LPA and 0.89 (0.82 to 0.96) for MVPA.
Substituting 10minutes of sedentary time with an equivalent period of LPA was not associated with a reduction in the prevalence ratio for CMP, whereas the equivalent replacement with MVPA showed a small protective relationship. Regarding CMP prevalence, physical activity intensity appears to be important, with MVPA rather than LPA showing a protective relationship. Prospective studies are needed to investigate causality.
身体活动是预防和管理慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)的有效干预措施。然而,目前缺乏关于应推荐的身体活动强度的研究。本研究旨在调查用 10 分钟低强度身体活动(LPA)或中等到剧烈强度身体活动(MVPA)替代 10 分钟久坐时间与 CMP 患病率比值之间的关联。
2008 年英格兰健康调查(Health Survey for England)数据的二次分析(2015 年 11 月)。
2313 名成年人(≥16 岁)。
使用加速度计测量久坐时间、LPA 和 MVPA。我们使用等时模型来量化用 10 分钟 LPA 或 MVPA 替代 10 分钟久坐时间对 CMP 患病率比值的影响。
该样本中 CMP 的患病率为 17%。未调整的患病率比值为 LPA 时 0.99(95%CI:0.97 至 1.01),MVPA 时 0.76(0.70 至 0.84)。完全调整后的患病率比值为 LPA 时 1.01(95%CI:0.99 至 1.02),MVPA 时 0.89(0.82 至 0.96)。
用等量的 LPA 替代 10 分钟久坐时间与 CMP 患病率比值的降低无关,而用 MVPA 替代则显示出较小的保护关系。关于 CMP 患病率,身体活动强度似乎很重要,MVPA 而非 LPA 显示出保护关系。需要前瞻性研究来探讨因果关系。