• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩会根据合作者和竞争者的情况调整自己行为的可见度。

Children, chimpanzees, and bonobos adjust the visibility of their actions for cooperators and competitors.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08435-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-08435-7
PMID:28819263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5561202/
Abstract

Chimpanzees and bonobos are highly capable of tracking other's mental states. It has been proposed, however, that in contrast to humans, chimpanzees are only able to do this in competitive interactions but this has rarely been directly tested. Here, pairs of chimpanzees or bonobos (Study 1) and 4-year-old children (Study 2) were presented with two almost identical tasks differing only regarding the social context. In the cooperation condition, players' interests were matched: they had to make corresponding choices to be mutually rewarded. To facilitate coordination, subjects should thus make their actions visible to their partner whose view was partially occluded. In the competition condition, players' interests were directly opposed: the partner tried to match the subject's choice but subjects were only rewarded if they chose differently, so that they benefited from hiding their actions. The apes successfully adapted their decisions to the social context and their performance was markedly better in the cooperation condition. Children also distinguished between the two contexts, but somewhat surprisingly, performed better in the competitive condition. These findings demonstrate experimentally that chimpanzees and bonobos can take into account what others can see in cooperative interactions. Their social-cognitive skills are thus more flexible than previously assumed.

摘要

黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩非常善于跟踪他人的心理状态。然而,有人提出,与人类不同,黑猩猩只能在竞争互动中做到这一点,但这很少被直接测试。在这里,成对的黑猩猩或倭黑猩猩(研究 1)和 4 岁的儿童(研究 2)被呈现出两个几乎完全相同的任务,只是在社会背景上有所不同。在合作条件下,玩家的利益是匹配的:他们必须做出相应的选择才能相互奖励。为了便于协调,参与者应该让他们的动作对他们的伙伴可见,而他们的伙伴的视野则部分被遮挡。在竞争条件下,玩家的利益直接对立:伙伴试图匹配参与者的选择,但只有当参与者选择不同时,参与者才会得到奖励,因此他们受益于隐藏自己的动作。这些猩猩成功地根据社会环境调整了他们的决策,并且在合作条件下的表现明显更好。儿童也能区分两种情况,但令人惊讶的是,他们在竞争条件下的表现更好。这些发现通过实验证明,黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩可以在合作互动中考虑到他人能看到的东西。他们的社会认知技能因此比之前假设的更灵活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/069913391509/41598_2017_8435_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/dfacf5e63654/41598_2017_8435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/50e94c631bbc/41598_2017_8435_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/9da24c60d540/41598_2017_8435_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/069913391509/41598_2017_8435_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/dfacf5e63654/41598_2017_8435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/50e94c631bbc/41598_2017_8435_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/9da24c60d540/41598_2017_8435_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a8/5561202/069913391509/41598_2017_8435_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Children, chimpanzees, and bonobos adjust the visibility of their actions for cooperators and competitors.儿童、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩会根据合作者和竞争者的情况调整自己行为的可见度。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08435-7.
2
Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study.黑猩猩与倭黑猩猩群体规模差异的潜在因素:综述与未来研究假设
Primates. 2009 Jul;50(3):197-209. doi: 10.1007/s10329-009-0141-6. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
3
Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的社会玩耍:对自然社会系统和个体间关系的启示
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Mar;129(3):418-26. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20289.
4
Information transfer efficiency differs in wild chimpanzees and bonobos, but not social cognition.野生黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩的信息传递效率不同,但社会认知能力相同。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20200523. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0523.
5
Chimpanzees, bonobos and children successfully coordinate in conflict situations.黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和儿童在冲突情境中能够成功地进行协作。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 14;284(1856). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0259.
6
Differences in the mutual eye gaze of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)相互注视眼球的差异。
J Comp Psychol. 2020 Aug;134(3):318-322. doi: 10.1037/com0000247.
7
Bonobos show limited social tolerance in a group setting: a comparison with chimpanzees and a test of the relational model.倭黑猩猩在群体环境中表现出有限的社会容忍度:与黑猩猩的比较及关系模型测试。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2015;86(3):164-77. doi: 10.1159/000373886. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
8
A Comparison Between Bonobos and Chimpanzees: A Review and Update.倭黑猩猩与黑猩猩的比较:综述与更新
Evol Anthropol. 2016 Sep;25(5):239-252. doi: 10.1002/evan.21501.
9
Volumetric and lateralized differences in selected brain regions of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)部分脑区的体积和侧化差异。
Am J Primatol. 2009 Dec;71(12):988-97. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20741.
10
Male reproductive skew is higher in bonobos than chimpanzees.雄性繁殖偏好在倭黑猩猩中比在黑猩猩中更高。
Curr Biol. 2017 Jul 10;27(13):R640-R641. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.039.

引用本文的文献

1
Tolerant and despotic macaques show divergent temperament but similar theory of mind.宽容和专制的猕猴表现出不同的性情,但具有相似的心理理论。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240121. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0121.
2
Bonobos point more for ignorant than knowledgeable social partners.倭黑猩猩会向无知而非知识渊博的社交伙伴更多地指物示意。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 11;122(6):e2412450122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412450122. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) strategically manipulate their environment to deny conspecifics access to food.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Engagement Leads 2-Year-Olds to Overestimate Others' Knowledge.社交互动导致两岁幼儿高估他人的知识水平。
Infancy. 2011 May;16(3):248-265. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00044.x.
2
The psychology of primate cooperation and competition: a call for realigning research agendas.灵长类动物合作与竞争的心理学:呼吁重新调整研究议程。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150067. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0067.
3
Chimpanzees strategically manipulate what others can see.黑猩猩会巧妙地操控其他个体所能看到的东西。
黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)会策略性地操纵环境,使同种动物无法获得食物。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68159-3.
4
The coordination of attention and action in great apes and humans.在大型猿类和人类中注意力与动作的协调。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210093. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0093. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
5
Sensitivity to line-of-sight in tolerant versus despotic macaques (Macaca sylvanus and Macaca mulatta).宽容型和专制型猕猴(猕猴和猕猴)对视线的敏感性。
J Comp Psychol. 2022 May;136(2):93-104. doi: 10.1037/com0000309. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
Japanese Macaques' (Macaca fuscata) sensitivity to human gaze and visual perspective in contexts of threat, cooperation, and competition.日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)在威胁、合作和竞争情境下对人类注视和视觉角度的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5264. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84250-5.
7
Gorillas' (Gorilla g. gorilla) knowledge of conspecifics' affordances: intraspecific social tool use for food acquisition.大猩猩(Gorilla g. gorilla)对同种个体工具使用功能的认识:同种内社会工具使用获取食物。
Primates. 2020 Jul;61(4):583-591. doi: 10.1007/s10329-020-00805-6. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
Chimpanzee Coordination and Potential Communication in a Two-touchscreen Turn-taking Game.黑猩猩在双触屏轮次游戏中的协调和潜在交流。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60307-9.
9
Flexible gaze-following in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴灵活的视线跟随能力。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):673-686. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01263-4. Epub 2019 May 16.
Anim Cogn. 2015 Sep;18(5):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0875-z. Epub 2015 May 12.
4
18-month-olds comprehend indirect communicative acts.18个月大的幼儿能够理解间接的交流行为。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.036. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
5
Coordination strategies of chimpanzees and human children in a Stag Hunt game.黑猩猩与人类儿童在猎鹿博弈中的协调策略
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 7;281(1796):20141973. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1973.
6
Children use salience to solve coordination problems.儿童利用显著性来解决协调问题。
Dev Sci. 2015 May;18(3):495-501. doi: 10.1111/desc.12224. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
7
Two-year-old children but not domestic dogs understand communicative intentions without language, gestures, or gaze.两岁的儿童能够理解交际意图,而家犬却不能,即便没有语言、手势或眼神交流。
Dev Sci. 2015 Mar;18(2):232-42. doi: 10.1111/desc.12206. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
"I know you don't know I know…" children use second-order false-belief reasoning for peer coordination.“我知道你不知道我知道……”儿童使用二阶错误信念推理进行同伴协调。
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):287-93. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12264. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
9
Great apes generate goal-based action predictions: an eye-tracking study.巨猿生成基于目标的动作预测:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;25(9):1691-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797614536402. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition?竞争范式能否提高灵长类动物社会认知实验的有效性?
Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):269-80. doi: 10.1007/s100710100084. Epub 2001 Jun 2.