Suppr超能文献

在大型猿类和人类中注意力与动作的协调。

The coordination of attention and action in great apes and humans.

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210093. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0093. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Abstract

Great apes can discern what others are attending to and even direct others' attention to themselves in flexible ways. But they seemingly do not coordinate their attention with one another recursively-understanding that the other is monitoring their attention just as they are monitoring hers-in acts of joint attention, at least not in the same way as young human children. Similarly, great apes collaborate with partners in many flexible ways, but they seemingly do not coordinate with others to form mutually obligating joint goals and commitments, nor regulate the collaboration via acts of intentional communication, at least not in the same way as young human children. The hypothesis defended here is that it is precisely in their capacities to coordinate attention and action with others-that is, in their capacities for shared intentionality-that humans are most clearly distinguished from other great apes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Revisiting the human 'interaction engine': comparative approaches to social action coordination'.

摘要

大型猿类能够察觉他人的注意力所在,甚至能够以灵活的方式引导他人将注意力转移到自己身上。但它们似乎不会以递归的方式协调彼此的注意力——理解对方在像他们监控自己的注意力一样监控着对方——在共同注意力的行为中,至少不像年幼的人类儿童那样。同样,大型猿类以许多灵活的方式与伙伴合作,但它们似乎不会与他人协调,形成相互义务的共同目标和承诺,也不会通过故意沟通的行为来调节合作,至少不像年幼的人类儿童那样。本文所捍卫的假设是,正是在与他人协调注意力和行动的能力——即共同意向的能力——中,人类与其他大型猿类最为明显地区别开来。本文是主题为“重新审视人类‘互动引擎’:比较社会行为协调方法”的一部分。

相似文献

1
The coordination of attention and action in great apes and humans.在大型猿类和人类中注意力与动作的协调。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210093. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0093. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
When and how do non-human great apes communicate to support cooperation?何时以及如何通过非人类的大猿类进行交流来支持合作?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210109. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0109. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Coordinating social action: a primer for the cross-species investigation of communicative repair.协调社会行动:跨物种交际修复研究入门
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210110. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0110. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Great ape communication as contextual social inference: a computational modelling perspective.巨猿交流作为语境社会推理:计算建模视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210096. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0096. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
5
How 2- and 4-year-old children coordinate social interactions with peers.2 至 4 岁儿童如何与同伴协调社会互动。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210100. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0100. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
6
A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.会聚交互引擎:狨猴的声音交流。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210098. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0098. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
7
Revisiting the human 'interaction engine': comparative approaches to social action coordination.重新审视人类“交互引擎”:社会行为协调的比较方法。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210092. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0092. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
Visual bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction.视觉身体信号作为互动中协调思维的核心装置。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210094. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0094. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
Interaction and ostension: the myth of 4th-order intentionality.互动与明示:第四阶意向性的神话。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210105. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0105. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

9
Great ape interaction: Ladyginian but not Gricean.巨猿的互动:拉季gian 而非格莱斯ian。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 17;120(42):e2300243120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300243120. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Bonobos engage in joint commitment.倭黑猩猩会进行共同承诺。
Sci Adv. 2020 Dec 18;6(51). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1306. Print 2020 Dec.
5
6
The moral psychology of obligation.义务的道德心理学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 May 28;43:e56. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001742.
9
How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account.儿童如何理解错误信念:共享意向性解释。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 21;115(34):8491-8498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804761115. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
10
The goal of ape pointing.猿猴指向的目的。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0195182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195182. eCollection 2018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验