Duguid Shona, Wyman Emily, Bullinger Anke F, Herfurth-Majstorovic Katharina, Tomasello Michael
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 7;281(1796):20141973. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1973.
Much of human cooperation takes place in mutualistic contexts in which the main challenge for individuals is how to coordinate decisions. In the current studies, we compared the abilities of chimpanzees and young children to coordinate with a partner in two versions of a Stag Hunt game. When risks were low (the hare was of low value) and information was cheap (the partner's behaviour was readily observable), partners of both species were able to successfully coordinate on the higher value stag more than 90% of the time. By contrast, when the risks were raised and observing the partner was more difficult, the chimpanzees became less successful, whereas the children compensated, and so remained highly successful, by communicating more often and more specifically. This pattern of results is consistent with the hypothesis that humans evolved unique skills of coordination and communication in the context of especially risky coordination problems.
人类的许多合作都发生在互利的情境中,在这种情境下,个体面临的主要挑战是如何协调决策。在当前的研究中,我们比较了黑猩猩和幼儿在两种版本的“猎鹿博弈”游戏中与伙伴进行协调的能力。当风险较低(野兔价值较低)且信息获取成本较低(伙伴的行为易于观察)时,两个物种的伙伴都能够在超过90%的时间里成功地协调选择更高价值的雄鹿。相比之下,当风险增加且观察伙伴变得更加困难时,黑猩猩的成功率降低,而儿童则通过更频繁、更具体的沟通进行弥补,从而仍然保持了很高的成功率。这一结果模式与以下假设一致:在特别具有风险的协调问题情境中,人类进化出了独特的协调和沟通技能。