Dose Ann Marie, Hubbard Joleen M, Mansfield Aaron S, McCabe Pamela J, Krecke Catherine A, Sloan Jeff A
Mayo Clinic.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Sep 1;44(5):E194-E202. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.E194-E202.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a dignity therapy/life plan intervention in the outpatient oncology setting. .
RESEARCH APPROACH: Pilot descriptive study. .
SETTING: Outpatient clinic in a tertiary oncology center. .
PARTICIPANTS: 18 patients within 12 months after diagnosis undergoing treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer or non-small cell lung cancer. .
METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Patients received dignity therapy, consisting of a focused life review/values clarification interview session and two subsequent sessions to produce a generativity document, which they can use later as they wish. Participants also wrote a life plan, in which they listed future hopes and dreams. Intervention feasibility and acceptability for patients and oncology clinician satisfaction were assessed. .
FINDINGS: Among the 18 patients completing the intervention, almost all felt it was worthwhile, would do it again, had their expectations met or exceeded, would recommend it to others, and said the timing was just right. .
INTERPRETATION: This psychosocial intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to patients with cancer undergoing active treatment. .
Nurses may be in an ideal position to offer a dignity therapy/life plan intervention to patients with advanced cancer during treatment.
目的/目标:确定尊严疗法/生命计划干预措施在门诊肿瘤治疗环境中的可行性和可接受性。
试点描述性研究。
一家三级肿瘤中心的门诊诊所。
18名在确诊后12个月内正在接受晚期胰腺癌或非小细胞肺癌治疗的患者。
患者接受尊严疗法,包括一次聚焦生命回顾/价值观澄清访谈以及随后两次生成一份传承文件的访谈,患者可根据自身意愿在之后使用该文件。参与者还撰写了一份生命计划,列出未来的希望和梦想。评估了干预措施对患者的可行性和可接受性以及肿瘤临床医生的满意度。
在完成干预的18名患者中,几乎所有人都认为该干预值得一试,愿意再次参与,期望得到了满足或超出,会向他人推荐,并且表示时机恰到好处。
这种心理社会干预措施对于正在接受积极治疗的癌症患者而言是可行且可接受的。
在治疗期间,护士可能处于为晚期癌症患者提供尊严疗法/生命计划干预的理想位置。