Suppr超能文献

一项化疗引起的周围神经病变患者报告结局指标的内容效度

The Content Validity of a Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.

作者信息

Lavoie Smith Ellen M, Haupt Rylie, Kelly James P, Lee Deborah, Kanzawa-Lee Grace, Knoerl Robert, Bridges Celia, Alberti Paola, Prasertsri Nusara, Donohoe Clare

机构信息

University of Michigan.

Saint Joseph Mercy Health System.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Sep 1;44(5):580-588. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.580-588.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To test the content validity of a 16-item version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (QLQ-CIPN20). 
.

RESEARCH APPROACH: Cross-sectional, prospective, qualitative design. 
.

SETTING: Six outpatient oncology clinics within the University of Michigan Health System's comprehensive cancer center in Ann Arbor. 
.

PARTICIPANTS: 25 adults with multiple myeloma or breast, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, or head and neck malignancies experiencing peripheral neuropathy caused by neurotoxic chemotherapy. 
.

METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Cognitive interviewing methodology was used to evaluate the content validity of a 16-item version of the QLQ-CIPN20 instrument.
.

FINDINGS: Minor changes were made to three questions to enhance readability. Twelve questions were revised to define unfamiliar terminology, clarify the location of neuropathy, and emphasize important aspects. One question was deleted because of clinical and conceptual redundancy with other items, as well as concerns regarding generalizability and social desirability. 
.

INTERPRETATION: Cognitive interviewing methodology revealed inconsistencies between patients' understanding and researchers' intent, along with points that required clarification to avoid misunderstanding. 
.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Patients' interpretations of the instrument's items were inconsistent with the intended meanings of the questions. One item was dropped and others were revised, resulting in greater consistency in how patients, clinicians, and researchers interpreted the items' meanings and improving the instrument's content validity. Following additional revision and psychometric testing, the QLQ-CIPN20 could evolve into a gold-standard CIPN patient-reported outcome measure.

摘要

目的/目标:检验欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷 - 化疗引起的周围神经病变(QLQ - CIPN20)16项版本的内容效度。

研究方法

横断面、前瞻性、定性设计。

研究地点

密歇根大学健康系统位于安阿伯的综合癌症中心内的六家门诊肿瘤诊所。

研究对象

25名患有多发性骨髓瘤或乳腺癌、妇科癌、胃肠道癌或头颈癌的成年人,他们因神经毒性化疗而出现周围神经病变。

方法学方法

采用认知访谈法评估QLQ - CIPN20量表16项版本的内容效度。

研究结果

对三个问题进行了细微修改以提高可读性。对12个问题进行了修订,以定义不熟悉的术语、明确神经病变的位置并强调重要方面。删除了一个问题,因为它与其他项目在临床和概念上存在冗余,同时也考虑到普遍性和社会期望性问题。

研究解读

认知访谈法揭示了患者理解与研究人员意图之间的不一致,以及需要澄清以避免误解的要点。

对护理的启示

患者对量表项目的理解与问题的预期含义不一致。删除了一个项目并对其他项目进行了修订,从而使患者、临床医生和研究人员对项目含义的解释更加一致,提高了量表的内容效度。经过进一步修订和心理测量测试后,QLQ - CIPN20可能会发展成为癌症诱导的周围神经病变患者报告结局的金标准测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb4/5913659/30d0274b9702/nihms960212f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验