van Tulder Raphael, Roth Dominik, Laggner Roberta, Krammel Mario, Schriefl Christoph, Kienbacher Calvin, Novosad Heinz, Chwojka Constantin Christof, Sterz Fritz, Havel Christof, Schreiber Wolfgang, Herkner Harald
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Department of General Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna.
Emergencias. 2017 Feb;29(1):11-17.
The quality of telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) needs improvement. This study investigates whether a dispatchers' perception is an adequate measure of the actual quality of CPR provided by laypersons.
Individual participant data from 3 randomized simulation trials, with identical methodology but different interventions, were combined for this analysis. Professional dispatchers gave telephone assistance to laypersons, who each provided 10 minutes of CPR on a manikin. Dispatchers were requested to classify the quality of providers' CPR as adequate or inadequate. Based on actual readings from manikins we classified providers' performance as adequate at 5-6 cm for depth and 100-120 compressions per minute (cpm) for rate. We calculated metrics of dispatcher accuracy.
Six dispatchers rated the performance of 94 laypersons (38 women [42%]) with a mean (SD) age of 37 (14) years. In 905 analyzed minutes of telephone-assisted CPR, the mean compression depth and rate was 41 (13) mm and 98 (24) cpm, respectively. Analysis of dispatchers' diagnostic test accuracy for adequate compression depth yielded a sensitivity of 65% (95 CI 36%-95%) and specificity of 42% (95% CI, 32%-53%). Analysis of their assessment of adequate compression rate yielded a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI, 64%-86%) and specificity of 42% (95% CI, 32%-52%). Although dispatchers always underestimated the actual values of CPR parameters, the female dispatchers evaluations were less inaccurate than the evaluations of make dispatchers; the dispatchers overall (males and females together) underestimated the adequacy of female laypersons' CPR performance to a greater degree than female dispatchers did.
The ability of dispatchers to estimate the quality of telephone-assisted CPR is limited. Dispatchers estimates of CPR adequacy needs to be studied further in order to find ways that telephone-assisted CPR might be improved.
电话辅助心肺复苏(CPR)的质量有待提高。本研究调查调度员的认知是否是衡量非专业人员实施的实际心肺复苏质量的充分指标。
本分析合并了3项随机模拟试验的个体参与者数据,这些试验方法相同但干预措施不同。专业调度员为非专业人员提供电话协助,每位非专业人员在模拟人上进行10分钟的心肺复苏。要求调度员将施救者的心肺复苏质量分类为充分或不充分。根据模拟人的实际读数,我们将施救者的表现分类为深度5 - 6厘米、速率每分钟100 - 120次按压(cpm)为充分。我们计算了调度员准确性的指标。
6名调度员对94名非专业人员(38名女性[42%])的表现进行了评分,这些非专业人员的平均(标准差)年龄为37(14)岁。在905分钟的电话辅助心肺复苏分析中,平均按压深度和速率分别为41(13)毫米和98(24)cpm。对调度员判断充分按压深度的诊断测试准确性分析得出,灵敏度为65%(95%置信区间36% - 95%),特异度为42%(95%置信区间,32% - 53%)。对他们对充分按压速率评估的分析得出,灵敏度为75%(95%置信区间,64% - 86%),特异度为42%(95%置信区间,32% - 52%)。尽管调度员总是低估心肺复苏参数的实际值,但女性调度员的评估比男性调度员的评估误差更小;总体而言(男性和女性一起)调度员对女性非专业人员心肺复苏表现充分性的低估程度比女性调度员更大。
调度员评估电话辅助心肺复苏质量的能力有限。需要进一步研究调度员对心肺复苏充分性的评估,以便找到改进电话辅助心肺复苏的方法。