• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从博兰-博利托案到修正后的蒙哥马利案——新加坡医疗过失法律标准的范式转变。

From Bolam-Bolitho to Modified-Montgomery - A Paradigm Shift in the Legal Standard of Determining Medical Negligence in Singapore.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017 Sep;46(9):347-350.

PMID:29022035
Abstract

In a recent landmark litigation, the Singapore Court of Appeal introduced a new legal standard for determining medical negligence with regards to information disclosure - the Modified-Montgomery test. This new test fundamentally shifts the legal position concerning the standard of care expected of a doctor when he dispenses medical advice. Previously, a doctor is expected to disclose what a "reasonable physician" would tell his patient. Now, a doctor must disclose "all material risks" that a "reasonable patient" would want to know under his unique circumstances. Patient-centred communication is no longer an aspirational ideal but has become a legal mandate. Manpower, administrative, logistic and medical educational reforms should start now, so as to support the average physician transit from the era of the Bolam-Bolitho, to that of the Modified-Montgomery.

摘要

在最近的一个具有里程碑意义的诉讼中,新加坡上诉法院引入了一个新的法律标准来确定与信息披露有关的医疗过失——改良的蒙哥马利测试。这个新的测试从根本上改变了医生在提供医疗建议时应承担的护理标准的法律地位。以前,医生预计会披露“合理医生”会告诉他的病人什么。现在,医生必须披露“合理病人”在他的特殊情况下想知道的“所有重大风险”。以病人为中心的沟通不再是一个理想,而是已经成为一项法律要求。人力、行政、后勤和医学教育改革现在就应该开始,以支持普通医生从博兰-博利托时代过渡到改良的蒙哥马利时代。

相似文献

1
From Bolam-Bolitho to Modified-Montgomery - A Paradigm Shift in the Legal Standard of Determining Medical Negligence in Singapore.从博兰-博利托案到修正后的蒙哥马利案——新加坡医疗过失法律标准的范式转变。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017 Sep;46(9):347-350.
2
Re-visiting Bolam and Bolitho in the light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.鉴于蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡卫生局案,重新审视博勒姆案和博利索案。
Med Leg J. 2018 Mar;86(1):42-44. doi: 10.1177/0025817217727218. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
3
Legal standard of care: a shift from the traditional Bolam test.法定注意标准:从传统的博勒姆测试转变。
Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):443-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-5-443.
4
'Bolam' to 'Montgomery' is result of evolutionary change of medical practice towards 'patient-centred care'.从“博勒姆案”到“蒙哥马利案”是医疗实践向“以患者为中心的护理”演变的结果。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Jan;93(1095):46-50. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134236. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
5
Hii Chii Kok v (1) Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien; (2) National Cancer Centre: Modifying Montgomery.希伊·奇伊·科克诉(1)ooi彭珍伦敦·吕西安;(2)国家癌症中心:修改蒙哥马利。 需注意,原文中“Hii Chii Kok”、“Ooi Peng Jin”、“London Lucien”等可能是特定的人名或术语,可能存在拼写不太准确的情况,这可能会影响对准确含义的理解。
Med Law Rev. 2019 May 1;27(2):339-351. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy044.
6
Think of the Children: Liability for Non-Disclosure of Information Post-Montgomery.为孩子着想:蒙哥马利案后信息披露的责任。
Med Law Rev. 2020 May 1;28(2):270-292. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwz023.
7
Giving the reasonable patient a voice: information disclosure and the relevance of empirical evidence.让理性的患者发声:信息披露与实证证据的相关性
Med Law Int. 2005;7(1):1-40. doi: 10.1177/096853320500700101.
8
The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: has India made the shift?临床指南在医疗过失诉讼中的作用:印度是否已做出转变?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul-Sep;6(3):158-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2009.051.
9
The frontiers of medical negligence and diagnosis: an interview-based analysis.医疗过失与诊断的前沿:基于访谈的分析。
Med Law Rev. 2023 Nov 27;31(4):485-500. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad009.
10
Comprehending disclosure: must patients understand the risks they run?理解披露内容:患者必须了解他们所面临的风险吗?
Med Law Int. 2000;4(2):97-109. doi: 10.1177/096853320000400202.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery: a historical and legal perspective on technological transformation.微创手术:技术变革的历史与法律视角
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 21;19(1):408. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02589-7.
2
Adopting the "TDODAR" Model to Improve Clinical Decision-Making in Acute and Critical Care Settings.采用“TDODAR”模型改善急重症护理环境中的临床决策
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Jun 24;8(1):53-56. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-14. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Legal and evidenced-based definitions of standard of care: Implications for code of ethics of professional medical societies.
护理标准的法律及循证定义:对专业医学协会道德准则的影响
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Dec 18;9:255. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_373_18. eCollection 2018.