Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Aug 1;9(8):741-747. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1310.
Although apolipoprotein B (apoB) is a superior marker of lipid-related risk compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), few data exist to translate the goals and thresholds from LDL-C to their apoB equivalent. In addition, although current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines provide a relative indication for apoB measurement among individuals with hypertriglyceridemia, whether discordance is limited to those subgroups is unknown.
To assess the variability in apoB level across the spectrum of LDL-C or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels and evaluate whether discordance between apoB and LDL-C or non-HDL-C is limited to specifiable subgroups.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used data from a nationally representative sample of 12 688 adult participants not using statins in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2005 and 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from April 2023 to February 2024.
Quantile regression was used to assess the population distribution of apoB across LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels. Discordance between apoB and LDL-C was the difference between measured apoB and median apoB levels for an individual's LDL-C level. Discordance was evaluated by age, sex, race and ethnicity, obesity, diabetes, triglyceride level, hemoglobin A1c level, body mass index (BMI), statin use, and metabolic health (defined as a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9, triglyceride level <150 mg/dL, and no diabetes).
Among the sample of 12 688 participants (median age, 41.0 years [IQR, 29.0-54.0 years]; 52.9% women) for LDL-C values of 55, 70, 100, and 190 mg/dL, the corresponding population median apoB levels were 49, 60, 80, and 140 mg/dL, respectively. For given levels of LDL-C, a range of apoB values was observed. At an LDL-C level of 100 mg/dL, the 95% population distribution of apoB ranged from 66 mg/dL to 99 mg/dL. ApoB variability was highest for LDL-C values estimated using the Friedewald equation, lower when using Sampson or Martin-Hopkins equations, and lowest for non-HDL-C. Although individuals with metabolic risk factors were more likely to have discordantly high apoB levels (ie, had higher median observed apoB levels relative to what was estimated based on LDL-C), significant variability in apoB levels was observed even among metabolically healthy individuals.
This study suggests that even metabolically healthy individuals may have discordantly high apoB levels relative to LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels. The current guideline approach for apoB testing only for those with hypertriglyceridemia appears too narrow. Population percentile data can be used to translate LDL-C goals and thresholds to their apoB equivalent to facilitate clinical adoption.
虽然载脂蛋白 B (apoB) 是比低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (LDL-C) 更能反映脂质相关风险的标志物,但将 LDL-C 的目标和阈值转化为其 apoB 等效物的数据很少。此外,尽管目前美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南为伴有高甘油三酯血症的个体提供了 apoB 测量的相对指征,但这种不匹配是否仅限于特定亚组尚不清楚。
评估 apoB 水平在 LDL-C 或非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (non-HDL-C) 水平谱中的变化,并评估 apoB 与 LDL-C 或 non-HDL-C 之间的不匹配是否仅限于可指定的亚组。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了 2005 年至 2016 年期间在全国健康和营养检查调查中未服用他汀类药物的 12688 名成年参与者的全国代表性样本数据。统计分析于 2023 年 4 月至 2024 年 2 月进行。
使用分位数回归评估 apoB 在 LDL-C 或 non-HDL-C 水平上的人群分布。apoB 与 LDL-C 之间的不匹配是个体 LDL-C 水平的测量 apoB 与个体中位 apoB 水平之间的差异。不匹配通过年龄、性别、种族和民族、肥胖、糖尿病、甘油三酯水平、糖化血红蛋白水平、体重指数 (BMI)、他汀类药物使用和代谢健康状况(定义为 BMI 在 18.5 至 24.9 之间、甘油三酯水平<150mg/dL 且无糖尿病)进行评估。
在 LDL-C 值为 55、70、100 和 190mg/dL 的 12688 名参与者样本中(中位数年龄为 41.0 岁[IQR,29.0-54.0 岁];52.9%为女性),相应的人群中位数 apoB 水平分别为 49、60、80 和 140mg/dL。对于给定的 LDL-C 值,观察到一系列 apoB 值。在 LDL-C 水平为 100mg/dL 时,apoB 的 95%人群分布范围为 66mg/dL 至 99mg/dL。使用 Friedewald 方程估计的 LDL-C 值的 apoB 变异性最高,使用 Sampson 或 Martin-Hopkins 方程时变异性较低,而使用非-HDL-C 时变异性最低。尽管有代谢危险因素的个体更有可能出现与 LDL-C 相比 apoB 水平升高(即,观察到的中位 apoB 水平高于基于 LDL-C 估计的水平),但即使在代谢健康的个体中,apoB 水平也存在显著差异。
本研究表明,即使是代谢健康的个体,apoB 水平相对于 LDL-C 或 non-HDL-C 水平也可能升高。目前仅针对高甘油三酯血症患者进行 apoB 检测的指南方法似乎过于狭窄。人群百分位数数据可用于将 LDL-C 目标和阈值转化为其 apoB 等效物,以促进临床应用。