• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于混合方法设计的新开发和重新设计的关键指标方法在评估不同体力劳动工作条件中的验证:一项研究方案

Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol.

作者信息

Klussmann Andre, Liebers Falk, Brandstädt Felix, Schust Marianne, Serafin Patrick, Schäfer Andreas, Gebhardt Hansjürgen, Hartmann Bernd, Steinberg Ulf

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Health, Safety and Ergonomics (ASER), Wuppertal, Germany.

University of Wuppertal, School of Mechanical Engineering and Safety Engineering, Chair of Human Engineering, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e015412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015412.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015412
PMID:28827239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724210/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The impact of work-related musculoskeletal disorders is considerable. The assessment of work tasks with physical workloads is crucial to estimate the work-related health risks of exposed employees. Three key indicator methods are available for risk assessment regarding manual lifting, holding and carrying of loads; manual pulling and pushing of loads; and manual handling operations. Three further KIMs for risk assessment regarding whole-body forces, awkward body postures and body movement have been developed de novo. In addition, the development of a newly drafted combined method for mixed exposures is planned. All methods will be validated regarding face validity, reliability, convergent validity, criterion validity and further aspects of utility under practical conditions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

As part of the joint project MEGAPHYS (multilevel risk assessment of physical workloads), a mixed-methods study is being designed for the validation of KIMs and conducted in companies of different sizes and branches in Germany. Workplaces are documented and analysed by observations, applying KIMs, interviews and assessment of environmental conditions. Furthermore, a survey among the employees at the respective workplaces takes place with standardised questionnaires, interviews and physical examinations. It is intended to include 1200 employees at 120 different workplaces. For analysis of the quality criteria, recommendations of the COSMIN checklist (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) will be taken into account.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was planned and conducted in accordance with the German Medical Professional Code and the Declaration of Helsinki as well as the German Federal Data Protection Act. The design of the study was approved by ethics committees. We intend to publish the validated KIMs in 2018. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international meetings and disseminated to actual users for practical application.

摘要

引言

与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病影响重大。对具有体力负荷的工作任务进行评估,对于估计接触此类工作的员工所面临的与工作相关的健康风险至关重要。有三种关键指标方法可用于评估手动搬运、握持和承载负荷;手动推拉负荷;以及手动操作。另外还全新开发了三种用于评估全身受力、身体姿势笨拙和身体运动的关键指标方法(KIMs)。此外,还计划开发一种新起草的用于混合暴露的综合方法。所有方法都将在实际条件下就表面效度、可靠性、收敛效度、标准效度及其他效用方面进行验证。

方法与分析

作为“MEGAPHYS(体力负荷的多层次风险评估)”联合项目的一部分,正在设计一项混合方法研究,用于验证关键指标方法,并在德国不同规模和行业的公司中开展。通过观察、应用关键指标方法、访谈以及环境条件评估,对工作场所进行记录和分析。此外,还会在各个工作场所对员工进行标准化问卷调查、访谈和体格检查。计划纳入120个不同工作场所的1200名员工。在分析质量标准时,将考虑COSMIN清单(基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准)的建议。

伦理与传播

本研究按照德国医学职业规范、《赫尔辛基宣言》以及德国联邦数据保护法进行规划和实施。研究设计已获伦理委员会批准。我们计划在2018年发表经过验证的关键指标方法。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,在国际会议上展示,并传播给实际用户以供实际应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a07/5724210/21c8c70b1446/bmjopen-2016-015412f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a07/5724210/f5ac92a6c0d4/bmjopen-2016-015412f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a07/5724210/21c8c70b1446/bmjopen-2016-015412f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a07/5724210/f5ac92a6c0d4/bmjopen-2016-015412f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a07/5724210/21c8c70b1446/bmjopen-2016-015412f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol.基于混合方法设计的新开发和重新设计的关键指标方法在评估不同体力劳动工作条件中的验证:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e015412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015412.
2
The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study.手工操作关键指标法(KIM-MHO)- 一种新方法在横断面研究中评估工作条件的评估。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Nov 25;11:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-272.
3
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
4
Physical working conditions as covered in European monitoring questionnaires.欧洲监测调查问卷所涵盖的体力工作条件。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4465-7.
5
Risk assessment of manual handling operations at work with the key indicator method (KIM-MHO) - determination of criterion validity regarding the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and clinical conditions within a cross-sectional study.采用关键指标法(KIM-MHO)对工作中的手工操作进行风险评估——在一项横断面研究中确定与肌肉骨骼症状和临床状况患病率相关的标准效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 10;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1542-0.
6
Equal health at work? Protocol for an observational study of work organisation, workload and musculoskeletal complaints among women and men in grocery retail.工作中的平等健康?一项观察性研究的方案,研究杂货零售行业中女性和男性的工作组织、工作负荷和肌肉骨骼投诉。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 13;10(1):e032409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032409.
7
Evaluation of objectivity, reliability and criterion validity of the key indicator method for manual handling operations (KIM-MHO), draft 2007.2007年草案:手工操作关键指标法(KIM-MHO)的客观性、可靠性及标准效度评估
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:3997-4003. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0699-3997.
8
[Risk assessment for upper extremity work related muscoloskeletal disorders in different manufactures by applying six methods of ergonomic analysis].[应用六种人体工程学分析方法对不同制造业上肢工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病进行风险评估]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2010 Apr-Jun;32(2):162-73.
9
NIOSH research efforts to prevent musculoskeletal disorders in the healthcare industry.美国国家职业安全与健康研究所为预防医疗行业肌肉骨骼疾病所做的研究工作。
Orthop Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):380-9. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200611000-00007.
10
Development and evaluation of RAMP II - a practitioner's tool for assessing musculoskeletal disorder risk factors in industrial manual handling.RAMP II 的开发与评估 - 一种用于评估工业手工操作中肌肉骨骼紊乱风险因素的实用工具。
Ergonomics. 2020 Apr;63(4):477-504. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1710576. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks.工业外骨骼从实验室到实际应用:职业环境和任务中的人机界面和用户体验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;10:1039680. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039680. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral Epicondylitis and Physical Exposure at Work? A Review of Prospective Studies and Meta-Analysis.肱骨外上髁炎与工作中的身体暴露?前瞻性研究与荟萃分析综述。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Nov;68(11):1681-1687. doi: 10.1002/acr.22874.
2
Carpal tunnel syndrome and work.腕管综合征与工作
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;29(3):440-53. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 27.
3
Low back pain, intervertebral disc and occupational diseases.腰痛、椎间盘与职业病。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1017940.
4
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
5
The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study.手工操作关键指标法(KIM-MHO)- 一种新方法在横断面研究中评估工作条件的评估。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Nov 25;11:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-272.
6
Physical demands at work, physical fitness, and 30-year ischaemic heart disease and all-cause mortality in the Copenhagen Male Study.工作中的体力需求、身体适应性与哥本哈根男性研究中的 30 年缺血性心脏病和全因死亡率。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 Sep;36(5):357-65. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2913. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
7
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.COSMIN 清单用于评估健康状况测量仪器测量性能研究的方法学质量:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
8
Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work.系统评价评估工作中生物力学暴露的观察方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 Jan;36(1):3-24. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2876. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
9
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
10
A systematic review of workplace ergonomic interventions with economic analyses.一项包含经济分析的工作场所人体工程学干预措施的系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Jun;20(2):220-34. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9210-3.