Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01054-17. Print 2017 Nov.
In a multiple-dose-ranging trial, we previously evaluated higher doses of rifampin in patients for 2 weeks. The objectives of the current study were to administer higher doses of rifampin for a longer period to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, and bacteriological activity of such regimens. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial, 150 Tanzanian patients with tuberculosis (TB) were randomized to receive either 600 mg (approximately 10 mg/kg of body weight), 900 mg, or 1,200 mg rifampin combined with standard doses of isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol administered daily for 2 months. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling occurred in 63 patients after 6 weeks of treatment, and safety/tolerability was assessed. The bacteriological response was assessed by culture conversion in liquid and solid media. Geometric mean total exposures (area under the concentration-versus-time curve up to 24 h after the dose) were 24.6, 50.8, and 76.1 mg · h/liter in the 600-mg, 900-mg, and 1,200-mg groups, respectively, reflecting a nonlinear increase in exposure with the dose ( < 0.001). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in only 2 patients in the 600-mg arm, 4 patients in the 900-mg arm, and 5 patients in the 1,200-mg arm. No significant differences in the bacteriological response were observed. Higher daily doses of rifampin (900 and 1,200 mg) resulted in a more than proportional increase in rifampin exposure in plasma and were safe and well tolerated when combined with other first-line anti-TB drugs for 2 months, but they did not result in improved bacteriological responses in patients with pulmonary TB. These findings have warranted evaluation of even higher doses of rifampin in follow-up trials. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00760149.).
在一项多剂量范围试验中,我们之前评估了在患者中使用更高剂量的利福平治疗 2 周。本研究的目的是给予更长时间的更高剂量利福平,以比较此类方案的药代动力学、安全性/耐受性和细菌学活性。在一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、II 期临床试验中,150 名坦桑尼亚肺结核(TB)患者被随机分为接受 600mg(约 10mg/kg 体重)、900mg 或 1200mg 利福平,与标准剂量异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇联合使用,每天 1 次,共 2 个月。在治疗 6 周后,对 63 名患者进行了强化药代动力学采样,并评估了安全性/耐受性。通过液体和固体培养基中的培养转换评估细菌学反应。600mg、900mg 和 1200mg 组的几何平均总暴露量(剂量后 24 小时内浓度-时间曲线下面积)分别为 24.6、50.8 和 76.1mg·h/L,反映了剂量依赖性的暴露非线性增加(<0.001)。600mg 组仅有 2 名患者发生 3 级不良事件,900mg 组有 4 名患者,1200mg 组有 5 名患者。未观察到细菌学反应的显著差异。更高的利福平日剂量(900 和 1200mg)导致血浆中利福平暴露量呈超比例增加,与其他一线抗结核药物联合使用 2 个月时安全且耐受良好,但并未改善肺结核患者的细菌学反应。这些发现证明需要在后续试验中评估更高剂量的利福平。(本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 NCT00760149)。