Suppr超能文献

高剂量利福平、莫西沙星和SQ109治疗结核病:一项多组、多阶段随机对照试验。

High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Boeree Martin J, Heinrich Norbert, Aarnoutse Rob, Diacon Andreas H, Dawson Rodney, Rehal Sunita, Kibiki Gibson S, Churchyard Gavin, Sanne Ian, Ntinginya Nyanda E, Minja Lilian T, Hunt Robert D, Charalambous Salome, Hanekom Madeleine, Semvua Hadija H, Mpagama Stellah G, Manyama Christina, Mtafya Bariki, Reither Klaus, Wallis Robert S, Venter Amour, Narunsky Kim, Mekota Anka, Henne Sonja, Colbers Angela, van Balen Georgette Plemper, Gillespie Stephen H, Phillips Patrick P J, Hoelscher Michael

机构信息

Department of Lung Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Centre of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;17(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30274-2. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis is the world's leading infectious disease killer. We aimed to identify shorter, safer drug regimens for the treatment of tuberculosis.

METHODS

We did a randomised controlled, open-label trial with a multi-arm, multi-stage design. The trial was done in seven sites in South Africa and Tanzania, including hospitals, health centres, and clinical trial centres. Patients with newly diagnosed, rifampicin-sensitive, previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive (all orally) either 35 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 15-20 mg/kg ethambutol, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 400 mg moxifloxacin, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, or a daily standard control regimen (10 mg/kg rifampicin, 5 mg/kg isoniazid, 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide, and 15-20 mg/kg ethambutol). Experimental treatments were given with oral 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide per day for 12 weeks, followed by 14 weeks of 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day. Because of the orange discoloration of body fluids with higher doses of rifampicin it was not possible to mask patients and clinicians to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to culture conversion in liquid media within 12 weeks. Patients without evidence of rifampicin resistance on phenotypic test who took at least one dose of study treatment and had one positive culture on liquid or solid media before or within the first 2 weeks of treatment were included in the primary analysis (modified intention to treat). Time-to-event data were analysed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model and adjusted for minimisation variables. The proportional hazard assumption was tested using Schoelfeld residuals, with threshold p<0·05 for non-proportionality. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01785186).

FINDINGS

Between May 7, 2013, and March 25, 2014, we enrolled and randomly assigned 365 patients to different treatment arms (63 to rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; 59 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109; 57 to rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and SQ109; 63 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin; and 123 to the control arm). Recruitment was stopped early in the arms containing SQ109 since prespecified efficacy thresholds were not met at the planned interim analysis. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin group than in the control group (median 48 days vs 62 days, adjusted hazard ratio 1·78; 95% CI 1·22-2·58, p=0·003), but not in other experimental arms. There was no difference in any of the groups in time to culture conversion on solid media. 11 patients had treatment failure or recurrent disease during post-treatment follow-up: one in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin arm and none in the moxifloxacin arm. 45 (12%) of 365 patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events, with similar proportions in each arm.

INTERPRETATION

A dose of 35 mg/kg rifampicin was safe, reduced the time to culture conversion in liquid media, and could be a promising component of future, shorter regimens. Our adaptive trial design was successfully implemented in a multi-centre, high tuberculosis burden setting, and could speed regimen development at reduced cost.

FUNDING

The study was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials partnership (EDCTP), the German Ministry for Education and Research (BmBF), and the Medical Research Council UK (MRC).

摘要

背景

结核病是全球首要的感染性疾病杀手。我们旨在确定更短、更安全的抗结核药物治疗方案。

方法

我们开展了一项随机对照、开放标签的试验,采用多组多阶段设计。该试验在南非和坦桑尼亚的7个地点进行,包括医院、健康中心和临床试验中心。将新诊断的、对利福平敏感的、既往未接受过治疗的肺结核患者按1:1:1:1:2的比例随机分配,(均口服)分别接受每日35mg/kg利福平联合15 - 20mg/kg乙胺丁醇、每日20mg/kg利福平联合400mg莫西沙星、每日20mg/kg利福平联合300mg SQ109、每日10mg/kg利福平联合300mg SQ109,或每日标准对照方案(10mg/kg利福平、5mg/kg异烟肼、25mg/kg吡嗪酰胺和15 - 20mg/kg乙胺丁醇)。试验性治疗方案在最初12周每日给予口服5mg/kg异烟肼和25mg/kg吡嗪酰胺,随后14周每日给予5mg/kg异烟肼和10mg/kg利福平。由于较高剂量利福平会使体液出现橙色变色,因此无法对患者和临床医生隐瞒治疗分配情况。主要终点为12周内液体培养基培养转阴时间。对表型试验无利福平耐药证据、至少服用一剂研究治疗药物且在治疗前或治疗的前2周内液体或固体培养基培养至少有一次阳性结果的患者进行主要分析(改良意向性分析)。采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析事件发生时间数据,并对最小化变量进行校正。使用Schoelfeld残差检验比例风险假设,非比例性阈值为p<0.05。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT01785186)。

结果

2013年5月7日至2014年3月25日期间,我们招募并随机分配365例患者至不同治疗组(63例至35mg/kg利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇组;59例至10mg/kg利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺、SQ109组;57例至20mg/kg利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和SQ109组;63例至10mg/kg利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和莫西沙星组;123例至对照组)。含SQ109的治疗组提前停止招募,因为在计划的中期分析中未达到预先设定的疗效阈值。35mg/kg利福平组液体培养基培养转为稳定阴性的时间比对照组快(中位数48天对62天,校正风险比1.78;95%CI 1.22 - 2.58,p = 0.003),但其他试验组无此差异。各治疗组在固体培养基上培养转阴时间无差异。11例患者在治疗后随访期间出现治疗失败或疾病复发:35mg/kg利福平组1例,莫西沙星组无。365例患者中有45例(12%)报告发生3 - 5级不良事件,各治疗组比例相似。

解读

35mg/kg利福平剂量安全,可缩短液体培养基培养转阴时间,可能是未来更短治疗方案中一个有前景的组成部分。我们的适应性试验设计在多中心、高结核病负担环境中成功实施,可降低成本加速治疗方案的研发。

资助

本研究由欧洲和发展中国家临床试验合作组织(EDCTP)、德国教育与研究部(BmBF)以及英国医学研究理事会(MRC)资助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/5159618/8799f796dbae/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验