Theou Olga, Blodgett Joanna M, Godin Judith, Rockwood Kenneth
Division of Geriatric Medicine (Theou, Godin, Rockwood), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (Blodgett), University College London, London, UK
Division of Geriatric Medicine (Theou, Godin, Rockwood), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (Blodgett), University College London, London, UK.
CMAJ. 2017 Aug 21;189(33):E1056-E1064. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.161034.
Sedentary behaviours are associated with adverse health outcomes in middle-aged and older adults, even among those who exercise. We examined whether the degree of frailty affects the association between sedentary behaviours and higher risk of mortality.
In this prospective cohort study, we used data from 3141 community-dwelling adults 50 years of age or older from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 cohorts of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Time engaged in sedentary behaviours was measured using uniaxial accelerometers, and frailty was based on a 46-item frailty index. Mortality data were linked up to 2011. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of sedentary behaviour.
We found that for people with low levels of frailty (frailty index score ≤ 0.1), sedentary time was not predictive of mortality, regardless of physical activity level (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.15). Among people who were vulnerable (0.1 < frailty index score ≤ 0.2) or frail (frailty index score > 0.2), sedentary time was associated with higher mortality only among those who were physically inactive (not meeting the criterion for moderate physical activity) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33 for the group defined by 0.1 < frailty index score ≤ 0.2; HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46 for the group defined by 0.2 < frailty index score ≤ 0.3; HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.50 for frailty index score > 0.3).
The effect of sedentary behaviours on mortality varied by level of frailty. Adults with the highest frailty level experienced the greatest adverse impact. Low frailty levels (frailty index score ≤ 0.1) seemed to eliminate the increased risk of mortality associated with prolonged sitting, even among people who did not meet recommended physical activity guidelines.
久坐行为与中老年人的不良健康结局相关,即使在那些进行锻炼的人群中也是如此。我们研究了衰弱程度是否会影响久坐行为与较高死亡风险之间的关联。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们使用了来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查2003/04和2005/06队列中3141名年龄在50岁及以上的社区居住成年人的数据。使用单轴加速度计测量久坐行为的时间,衰弱程度基于一个包含46个条目的衰弱指数。死亡率数据与2011年的数据相关联。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来估计久坐行为的风险比(HR)。
我们发现,对于衰弱程度较低(衰弱指数得分≤0.1)的人,无论身体活动水平如何,久坐时间都不能预测死亡率(调整后的HR为0.90,95%置信区间[CI]为0.70 - 1.15)。在脆弱(0.1 <衰弱指数得分≤0.2)或衰弱(衰弱指数得分> 0.2)的人群中,久坐时间仅在那些身体不活动(未达到中等身体活动标准)的人群中与较高的死亡率相关(对于0.1 <衰弱指数得分≤0.2的组,HR为1.16,95% CI为1.02 - 1.33;对于0.2 <衰弱指数得分≤0.3的组,HR为1.27,95% CI为1.11 - 1.46;对于衰弱指数得分> 0.3的组,HR为1.34,95% CI为1.19 - 1.50)。
久坐行为对死亡率的影响因衰弱程度而异。衰弱程度最高的成年人受到的不利影响最大。低衰弱程度(衰弱指数得分≤0.1)似乎消除了与长时间久坐相关的死亡风险增加,即使在未达到推荐身体活动指南的人群中也是如此。