• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸托槽基底形状对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的比较评估:一项研究。

Comparative evaluation of orthodontic bracket base shapes on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index: An study.

作者信息

Pham Dennis, Bollu Prashanti, Chaudhry Kishore, Subramani Karthikeyan

机构信息

Roseman University of Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Henderson, NV, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e848-e854. doi: 10.4317/jced.53869. eCollection 2017 Jul.

DOI:10.4317/jced.53869
PMID:28828149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5549581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthodontic bracket base shape on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study using 140 bovine incisors, shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets with different base shapes (rectangle, flower, round, heart, diamond, star, and football) were measured with an Instron testing machine and tested until bond failure. Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring was evaluated after debonding to evaluate the location of bond failure. Descriptive and one-way ANOVA post-hoc Tukey statistical analyses were performed with a statistical significance set at ≤0.05.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference in mean SBS in Newtons was observed for multiple base shapes (<0.05). The highest mean SBS (N ± SD) was observed in football and flower base shapes (73.83 N ± 53.46; 65.82 N ± 37.89 respectively); the lowest mean was observed with diamond and heart shapes (30.51 N ± 11.73; 33.28 N ± 16.89 respectively). When reported in Megaspascals, statistically significant difference was observed for rectangle base shape (3.54 MPa ± 2.69) when compared to all other base shapes.

CONCLUSIONS

Bracket base shape has an effect on SBS. Higher SBS (N) for rectangle, flower, and football base shape indicates even stress distributions throughout the bracket base. Base shape with a pronounced converging tip over the axial plane may contribute to the reduction in SBS due to increased peak stress concentration resulting in bond failure. Shaped brackets, Shear bond strength, Adhesive remnant index, WildSmiles®.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估正畸托槽底座形状对剪切粘结强度和粘结残留指数的影响。

材料与方法

在本研究中,使用140颗牛切牙,用英斯特朗试验机测量不同底座形状(矩形、花形、圆形、心形、菱形、星形和足球形)托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS),并测试至粘结失败。脱粘后评估粘结残留指数(ARI)评分,以评估粘结失败的位置。进行描述性和单因素方差分析后的Tukey统计分析,设定统计学显著性水平≤0.05。

结果

观察到多种底座形状的平均SBS(以牛顿为单位)存在统计学显著差异(<0.05)。在足球形和花形底座形状中观察到最高的平均SBS(N±SD)(分别为73.83 N±53.46;65.82 N±37.89);在菱形和心形形状中观察到最低的平均值(分别为30.51 N±11.73;33.28 N±16.89)。以兆帕为单位报告时,与所有其他底座形状相比,矩形底座形状(3.54 MPa±2.69)存在统计学显著差异。

结论

托槽底座形状对SBS有影响。矩形、花形和足球形底座形状的较高SBS(N)表明整个托槽底座的应力分布均匀。轴向平面上具有明显会聚尖端的底座形状可能由于峰值应力集中增加导致粘结失败,从而导致SBS降低。异形托槽、剪切粘结强度、粘结残留指数、WildSmiles®。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/73cc7822cd27/jced-9-e848-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/7b2fb938fbe0/jced-9-e848-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/87a84f8731d3/jced-9-e848-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/73cc7822cd27/jced-9-e848-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/7b2fb938fbe0/jced-9-e848-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/87a84f8731d3/jced-9-e848-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a59a/5549581/73cc7822cd27/jced-9-e848-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of orthodontic bracket base shapes on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index: An study.正畸托槽基底形状对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的比较评估:一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e848-e854. doi: 10.4317/jced.53869. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
The effect of orthodontic bracket pad shape on shear bond strength, an study on human enamel.正畸托槽垫片形状对剪切粘结强度的影响:一项关于人牙釉质的研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e789-e793. doi: 10.4317/jced.55121. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
The effect of orthodontic bracket base shape on shear bond strength to human enamel, an study.正畸托槽基底形状对人牙釉质剪切粘结强度的影响,一项研究。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 May 7;11:40585. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40585. eCollection 2024.
4
Influence of Primer Pre-curing and Co-curing on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Three Light-cure Adhesive Systems: An Study.三种光固化粘接系统中预固化和共固化对正畸托槽剪切粘接强度的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):900-906. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3409.
5
Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.釉质封闭对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响:三种含氟粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽联合应用的研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
6
Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽脱粘后的失败特征及粘结强度评估:托槽基底硅烷化的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):176-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm100. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
7
Evaluation of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of metal APC™ Flash-Free adhesive system: A comparative in vitro study with APC™ II and uncoated metal brackets.金属 APC™ Flash-Free 黏结系统的剪切粘结强度和黏结残留指数评价:与 APC™ II 和无涂层金属托槽的体外对比研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100705. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100705. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
8
Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials: Comparison on various dental restorative materials using the universal primer Monobond® Plus.修复材料上托槽的剪切粘结强度:使用通用底漆单组分粘结剂Plus对各种牙科修复材料的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Mar;77(2):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0011-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Evaluation of the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of color change, fluorescent, and conventional orthodontic adhesives: An in vitro study.变色、荧光和传统正畸粘接剂的剪切粘接强度和粘接残留指数评估:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2023 Mar;21(1):100712. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100712. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
10
The effect of pre-cure bracket movement on shear bond strength during placement of orthodontic brackets, an study.正畸托槽放置过程中预固化托槽移动对剪切粘结强度的影响,一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):e1212-e1217. doi: 10.4317/jced.54208. eCollection 2017 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Adhesive Remnant Index and Shear Bond Strength of Different Metal Bracket Bases on Artificially Aged Human Teeth: An Study.不同金属托槽基底在人工老化人牙上的黏结剂残留指数和剪切黏结强度比较:一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Oct 29;14(5):396-404. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_62_24. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
2
Comparison of Bond Strength Between Two Resin Cement Types and Additive Manufacturing or Cast Cobalt-Chromium Alloys.两种树脂水门汀类型与增材制造或铸造钴铬合金之间的粘结强度比较。
Cureus. 2024 May 25;16(5):e61041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61041. eCollection 2024 May.
3
The effect of orthodontic bracket base shape on shear bond strength to human enamel, an study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of shear bond strength to clinically simulated debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study.正畸托槽临床模拟脱粘的剪切粘结强度比较:一项体外研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2016 Jan-Mar;5(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.176655.
2
Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.使用有限元分析结合体外粘结强度测试评估不同托槽-粘结剂-牙釉质系统中产生的应力。
Prog Orthod. 2014 Apr 16;15(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0033-1.
3
Orthodontic molar brackets: the effect of three different base designs on shear bond strength.
正畸托槽基底形状对人牙釉质剪切粘结强度的影响,一项研究。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 May 7;11:40585. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40585. eCollection 2024.
4
Bonding Surface Designs in Fixed Orthodontic Attachments.固定正畸矫治器的粘结面设计
Int J Dent. 2023 Jan 23;2023:2846879. doi: 10.1155/2023/2846879. eCollection 2023.
5
Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study.不同类型黏结剂对正畸托槽剪切黏结强度的影响:一项循环加载研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;16(2):724. doi: 10.3390/ma16020724.
6
Physical and chemical mechanisms involved in adhesion of orthodontic bonding composites: in vitro evaluations.正畸粘接复合材料黏附的物理和化学机制:体外评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01715-9.
7
A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Direct Bonding System with and without a Liquid Primer: An Study.有液体底涂剂和无液体底涂剂的直接粘结系统剪切粘结强度的比较研究:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Nov;11(Suppl 3):S515-S522. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_259_18.
8
The effect of orthodontic bracket pad shape on shear bond strength, an study on human enamel.正畸托槽垫片形状对剪切粘结强度的影响:一项关于人牙釉质的研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e789-e793. doi: 10.4317/jced.55121. eCollection 2018 Aug.
正畸磨牙托槽:三种不同基底设计对剪切粘结强度的影响。
Int J Biomed Sci. 2011 Mar;7(1):27-34.
4
Shear bond strength and fracture analysis of human vs. bovine teeth.人牙与牛牙的抗剪粘接强度和断裂分析。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059181. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
5
Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents.儿童和青少年对正畸矫治器的偏好。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Dec;138(6):698.e1-12; discussion 698-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012.
6
The impact of malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need on the quality of life. A systematic review.错颌畸形/正畸治疗需求对生活质量的影响。一项系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):585-91. doi: 10.2319/042108-224.1.
7
Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness.正畸矫治器美观度的评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4 Suppl):S68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.025.
8
Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.剪切力与微剪切粘结强度测试:有限元应力分析
Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
9
Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel.金属托槽与牙釉质的剪切粘结强度。
Angle Orthod. 2006 Sep;76(5):851-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0851:SBSOMB]2.0.CO;2.
10
Aesthetic orthodontic brackets.美学正畸托槽
J Orthod. 2005 Jun;32(2):146-63. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021024.