• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸托槽基底形状对人牙釉质剪切粘结强度的影响,一项研究。

The effect of orthodontic bracket base shape on shear bond strength to human enamel, an study.

作者信息

Esmail Ziana, Wiltshire William, Pinheiro Fabio H S L, Frota Carolina M, França Rodrigo

机构信息

Department of Preventative Dental Science, Division of Orthodontics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 May 7;11:40585. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40585. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2340/biid.v11.40585
PMID:38873367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11171853/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthodontic bracket base shape on shear bond strength (SBS) to human enamel and assess the nature of debonding fractures using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Orthodontic brackets with different-shaped bases (flower, heart, rectangle) were bonded to 120 extracted human third molars. Shear bond strength was measured using a Servohydraulic Test System at 24 h and 2 months after bonding. Adhesive Remnant Index scores were evaluated under 10x magnification to assess the amount of resin left on the tooth. The control bracket (rectangular base shape) had the highest mean SBS (26.8 ± 8.2 megapascals [MPa]), and significantly differed from the flower (17.2 ± 4.4 MPa) and heart (18.9 ± 3.5 MPa) base shapes ( < 0.001). The mean SBS between debonding times at 24 h (21.5 ± 7.4 MPa) and 2 months (20.4 ± 6.7 MPa) were not statistically significant > 0.05). Analysis of ARI scores showed a significant difference between flower-24 h versus heart-2 months ( = 0.039), flower-24 h versus heart-24 h ( = 0.004), and control-2 months versus heart-24 h ( = 0.015). Bracket base shape influenced SBS, with the rectangular base shape having a higher mean SBS compared to flower and heart base shapes. Variations in ARI scores occurred based on bracket shape and were of a mixed adhesive-cohesive nature. All bracket shapes had bond strengths above the clinically acceptable range of 6-8 MPa, and may thus provide adequate SBS in a clinical situation.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估正畸托槽底座形状对与人类牙釉质的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响,并使用粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评估脱粘骨折的性质。将具有不同形状底座(花形、心形、矩形)的正畸托槽粘结到120颗拔除的人类第三磨牙上。在粘结后24小时和2个月时,使用伺服液压测试系统测量剪切粘结强度。在10倍放大倍数下评估粘结剂残留指数得分,以评估留在牙齿上的树脂量。对照托槽(矩形底座形状)的平均SBS最高(26.8±8.2兆帕斯卡[MPa]),与花形(17.2±4.4 MPa)和心形(18.9±3.5 MPa)底座形状有显著差异(<0.001)。24小时(21.5±7.4 MPa)和2个月(20.4±6.7 MPa)脱粘时间之间的平均SBS无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。ARI得分分析显示,花形-24小时与心形-2个月(=0.039)、花形-24小时与心形-24小时(=0.004)以及对照-2个月与心形-24小时(=0.015)之间存在显著差异。托槽底座形状影响SBS,矩形底座形状的平均SBS高于花形和心形底座形状。ARI得分因托槽形状而异,具有混合的粘结-内聚性质。所有托槽形状的粘结强度均高于临床可接受范围6-8 MPa,因此在临床情况下可能提供足够的SBS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f67/11171853/01bcb3945497/BIiD-11-40585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f67/11171853/01bcb3945497/BIiD-11-40585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f67/11171853/01bcb3945497/BIiD-11-40585-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of orthodontic bracket base shape on shear bond strength to human enamel, an study.正畸托槽基底形状对人牙釉质剪切粘结强度的影响,一项研究。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 May 7;11:40585. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40585. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative evaluation of orthodontic bracket base shapes on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index: An study.正畸托槽基底形状对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的比较评估:一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e848-e854. doi: 10.4317/jced.53869. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
The effect of orthodontic bracket pad shape on shear bond strength, an study on human enamel.正畸托槽垫片形状对剪切粘结强度的影响:一项关于人牙釉质的研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e789-e793. doi: 10.4317/jced.55121. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study.使用光固化复合树脂比较带箔网和激光结构基底的托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Dec 1;16(12):963-70. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1789.
5
Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.釉质封闭对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响:三种含氟粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽联合应用的研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
6
Effect of enamel protective agents on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.釉质保护剂对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响
Prog Orthod. 2014 Jul 18;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0034-0.
7
Influence of Primer Pre-curing and Co-curing on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Three Light-cure Adhesive Systems: An Study.三种光固化粘接系统中预固化和共固化对正畸托槽剪切粘接强度的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):900-906. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3409.
8
The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.网基设计变化对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):400-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0400:TEOVIM>2.0.CO;2.
9
Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Using Self-adhesive Cement to Facilitate Bracket Debonding.使用自粘接剂粘结正畸托槽以促进托槽的脱落。
J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(6):551-556. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43652.
10
Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽脱粘后的失败特征及粘结强度评估:托槽基底硅烷化的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):176-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm100. Epub 2008 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review on Orthodontic Brackets and Their Application in Clinical Orthodontics.正畸托槽及其在临床正畸中的应用综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 7;15(10):e46615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46615. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Impact of a High-Power Light-Emitting Diode Unit With Reduced Curing Times on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets and Their Adhesive Remnant Index Scores.具有缩短固化时间的高功率发光二极管装置对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度及其粘结残留指数评分的影响
Cureus. 2023 Jun 2;15(6):e39855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39855. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The effect of orthodontic bracket pad shape on shear bond strength, an study on human enamel.
正畸托槽垫片形状对剪切粘结强度的影响:一项关于人牙釉质的研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e789-e793. doi: 10.4317/jced.55121. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Comparative evaluation of orthodontic bracket base shapes on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index: An study.正畸托槽基底形状对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的比较评估:一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e848-e854. doi: 10.4317/jced.53869. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
6
Effect of curing time on the bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or plasma arc light. curing 时间对光固化灯和等离子弧光灯固化的托槽粘接系统粘结强度的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):55-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq027. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
7
In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外正畸粘结强度测试:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):615-622.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.021.
8
A comparison of tungsten-quartz-halogen, plasma arc and light-emitting diode light sources for the polymerization of an orthodontic adhesive.用于正畸粘合剂聚合的钨-石英-卤素灯、等离子弧光灯和发光二极管光源的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Feb;28(1):78-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji076. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
9
Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing.正畸剪切粘结强度测试中力的位置的影响
Dent Mater. 2005 May;21(5):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.004.
10
The influence of orthodontic bracket base diameter and mesh size on bond strength.正畸托槽基底直径和网眼尺寸对粘结强度的影响。
SADJ. 2002 Jan;57(1):16-20.