Suppr超能文献

经颅多普勒超声检测椎动脉狭窄:与 CT 血管造影的对比。

Duplex ultrasonography for the detection of vertebral artery stenosis: A comparison with CT angiography.

机构信息

Department of Neurology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2017 Jun 29;7(8):e00750. doi: 10.1002/brb3.750. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vertebrobasilar stenosis is frequent in patients with posterior circulation stroke and it increases risk of recurrence. We investigated feasibility of duplex ultrasonography (DUS) for screening for extracranial vertebral artery stenosis and compared it with CT angiography (CTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We gathered data on 337 consecutive patients who had DUS because of posterior circulation stroke or TIA. Matching CTA studies were retrieved and used as reference. Stenosis on CTA was considered "significant" if >50%, at DUS if Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) > 140 cm/s for the V1 segment and PSV > 125 cm/s for the V2 segment. We determined the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). In addition, we calculated which PSV cut-off value resulted in highest sensitivity with acceptable specificity.

RESULTS

DUS was able to make an adequate measurement in 378 of 674 V1 segments and 673 of 674 V2 segments. DUS detected a significant stenosis in 52 of 378 V1 segments; 12 were confirmed by CTA (AUROC 0.73, 95% Confidence Interval 0.63-0.83). The optimal DUS PSV cut-off value for this segment was 90 cm/s. For the V2 segment there were too few stenoses to allow reliable assessment of diagnostic characteristics of DUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DUS has a fair AUROC for detecting significant stenosis, adequate assessment of the V1 segment is often not possible due to anatomic difficulties. Assessment of the V2 segment is feasible but yielded few stenoses. Hence, we consider usefulness of DUS for screening of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis limited.

摘要

目的

椎基底动脉狭窄在后循环卒中患者中较为常见,且增加了卒中复发的风险。本研究旨在探讨双功能超声(DUS)筛查颅外椎动脉狭窄的可行性,并与 CT 血管造影(CTA)进行比较。

材料与方法

我们收集了 337 例因后循环卒中或 TIA 而行 DUS 的连续患者的数据。检索并使用了匹配的 CTA 研究作为参考。如果 CTA 上的狭窄程度>50%,或 V1 段的峰值收缩速度(PSV)>140cm/s,或 V2 段的 PSV>125cm/s,则认为 DUS 上存在狭窄。我们确定了 ROC 曲线下的面积(AUROC)。此外,我们还计算了 PSV 截断值,以获得最高灵敏度和可接受的特异性。

结果

在 674 个 V1 段和 674 个 V2 段中,DUS 能够对 378 个 V1 段和 673 个 V2 段进行充分测量。在 378 个 V1 段中,DUS 检测到 52 个显著狭窄,其中 12 个经 CTA 证实(AUROC 0.73,95%置信区间 0.63-0.83)。该节段的最佳 DUS PSV 截断值为 90cm/s。对于 V2 段,狭窄病变数量太少,无法对 DUS 的诊断特征进行可靠评估。

结论

尽管 DUS 对检测显著狭窄有较好的 AUROC,但由于解剖学上的困难,往往无法对 V1 段进行充分评估。V2 段的评估是可行的,但狭窄病变数量较少。因此,我们认为 DUS 对颅外椎动脉狭窄筛查的应用价值有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2963/5561311/c34c1f34ac0a/BRB3-7-e00750-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验