Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的镇静和神经肌肉阻滞剂

Sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Bourenne Jeremy, Hraiech Sami, Roch Antoine, Gainnier Marc, Papazian Laurent, Forel Jean-Marie

机构信息

APHM, Hôpital la Timone, Réanimation des urgences et médicale, Marseille, France.

Centre d'Études et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de Vie, CEReSS, Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):291. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.19.

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management. The use of protective ventilation is a priority in this acute phase of lung inflammation. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) induce reversible muscle paralysis. Their use in patients with ARDS remains controversial but occurs frequently. NMBAs are used in 25-45% of ARDS patients for a mean period of 1±2 days. The main indications of NMBAs are hypoxemia and facilitation of MV. For ethical reasons, NMBA use is inseparable from sedation in the management of early ARDS. During paralysis, sedation monitoring seems to be necessary to avoid awareness with recall. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that the systematic use of NMBAs in the early management of ARDS patients improves oxygenation. Furthermore, the most recent trial reported a reduction of mortality at 90 days when NMBAs were infused over 48 hours. Spontaneous ventilation (SV) during MV at the acute phase of ARDS could improve oxygenation and alveolar recruitment, but it may not allow protective ventilation. The major risk is an increase in ventilator-induced lung injury. However, the adverse effects of NMBAs are widely discussed, particularly the occurrence of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness. This review analyses the recent findings in the literature concerning sedation and paralysis in managing ARDS.

摘要

机械通气(MV)是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)治疗的基石。在肺部炎症的急性期,采用保护性通气是首要任务。神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)可引起可逆性肌肉麻痹。其在ARDS患者中的应用仍存在争议,但却经常使用。25%至45%的ARDS患者使用NMBAs,平均使用时间为1±2天。NMBAs的主要适应证是低氧血症和便于进行机械通气。出于伦理原因,在早期ARDS的治疗中,NMBAs的使用与镇静密不可分。在麻痹期间,似乎有必要进行镇静监测以避免苏醒期知晓。三项随机对照试验(RCTs)表明,在ARDS患者的早期治疗中系统性使用NMBAs可改善氧合。此外,最近的试验报告称,当NMBAs在48小时内输注时,90天死亡率降低。在ARDS急性期进行机械通气时的自主通气(SV)可改善氧合和肺泡复张,但可能无法实现保护性通气。主要风险是呼吸机诱导性肺损伤增加。然而,NMBAs的不良反应受到广泛讨论,尤其是重症监护病房(ICU)获得性肌无力的发生。本综述分析了近期文献中关于ARDS治疗中镇静和麻痹的研究结果。

相似文献

2
Paralytics in critical care: not always the bad guy.重症监护中的麻痹剂:并不总是“坏人”。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Feb;15(1):59-66. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283220e60.
9
Early Paralysis for the Management of ARDS.早期麻痹用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征的管理。
Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):830-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04734. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验