Post-Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Via A. Moro 2, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Dec;15(6):773-783. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0342-x.
The sustainability of healthcare systems is a topic of major interest. During periods of economic instability, policy makers typically reallocate resources and execute linear cuts in different areas of public spending, including healthcare.
The aim of this paper was to examine whether and how per capita public healthcare expenditure (PHE) in the Italian regions was related to the all-cause mortality rate (MR) between 1999 and 2013 and to determine which expenditure item most affected mortality in the short and very short term.
We conducted a pooled cross-sectional time series study. Secondary data were extracted from 'Health for All', a database released periodically by the Italian National Institute of Statistics. PHE is subdivided into directly provided services (DPS), pharmaceutical care, general practitioner care, specialist medical care, privately delivered hospital care, other privately delivered medical services, and psychiatric support and rehabilitation. We used a fixed-effects regression to assess the effects of PHE items on the MR after controlling for a number of socioeconomic and supply variables.
Higher spending on DPS was associated with a lower MR. Other expenditure variables were not significantly associated with the MR.
The results highlight the importance of medical services and goods provided directly by public services (i.e. hospital-based general and specialized wards and offices, emergency departments, etc.). DPS represents the driving force of the system and should be considered a determinant of the health of the Italian population. Our results suggest that the context and financing methods of a healthcare system should be carefully analysed before linear cuts are made or resources are reallocated.
医疗保健系统的可持续性是一个备受关注的话题。在经济不稳定时期,政策制定者通常会重新分配资源,并在包括医疗保健在内的公共支出的不同领域执行线性削减。
本文旨在探讨意大利各地区的人均公共医疗支出(PHE)与 1999 年至 2013 年全因死亡率(MR)之间是否存在关联,以及确定哪些支出项目在短期和极短期对死亡率的影响最大。
我们进行了一项汇总的横断面时间序列研究。次要数据从意大利国家统计局定期发布的“全民健康”数据库中提取。PHE 分为直接提供的服务(DPS)、药物治疗、全科医生护理、专科医疗护理、私人提供的住院护理、其他私人提供的医疗服务以及精神科支持和康复。我们使用固定效应回归模型,在控制了一系列社会经济和供应变量后,评估了 PHE 项目对 MR 的影响。
DPS 支出较高与 MR 较低相关。其他支出变量与 MR 无显著关联。
研究结果强调了公共服务直接提供的医疗服务和商品(即医院内的普通和专科病房和办公室、急诊部门等)的重要性。DPS 是系统的驱动力,应被视为意大利人口健康的决定因素。我们的结果表明,在进行线性削减或重新分配资源之前,应仔细分析医疗保健系统的背景和融资方法。