Peters Christian Daugaard, Mathiassen Ole Norling, Vase Henrik, Bech Nørgaard Jesper, Christensen Kent Lodberg, Schroeder Anne Pauline, Rickers Hans Joachim von Hofe, Opstrup Ulla Kampmann, Poulsen Per Løgstrup, Langfeldt Sten, Andersen Gratien, Hansen Klavs Würgler, Bøtker Hans Erik, Engholm Morten, Bertelsen Jannik Buus, Pedersen Erling Bjerregaard, Kaltoft Anne, Buus Niels Henrik
a Department of Renal Medicine , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.
b Department of Cardiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.
Blood Press. 2017 Dec;26(6):366-380. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2017.1368368. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
To investigate, whether renal denervation (RDN) improves arterial stiffness, central blood pressure (C-BP) and heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with treatment resistant hypertension.
ReSET was a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial (NCT01459900). RDN was performed by a single experienced operator using the Medtronic unipolar Symplicity Flex catheter. C-BP, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), and HRV were obtained at baseline and after six months with the SphygmoCor-device.
Fifty-three patients (77% of the ReSET-cohort) were included in this substudy. The groups were similar at baseline (SHAM/RDN): n = 27/n = 26; 78/65% males; age 59 ± 9/54 ± 8 years (mean ± SD); systolic brachial BP 158 ± 18/154 ± 17 mmHg; systolic 24-hour ambulatory BP 153 ± 14/151 ± 13 mmHg. Changes in PWV (0.1 ± 1.9 (SHAM) vs. -0.6 ± 1.3 (RDN) m/s), systolic C-BP (-2 ± 17 (SHAM) vs. -8 ± 16 (RDN) mmHg), diastolic C-BP (-2 ± 9 (SHAM) vs. -5 ± 9 (RDN) mmHg), and augmentation index (0.7 ± 7.0 (SHAM) vs. 1.0 ± 7.4 (RDN) %) were not significantly different after six months. Changes in HRV-parameters were also not significantly different. Baseline HRV or PWV did not predict BP-response after RDN.
In a sham-controlled setting, there were no significant effects of RDN on arterial stiffness, C-BP and HRV. Thus, the idea of BP-independent effects of RDN on large arteries and cardiac autonomic activity is not supported.
研究肾去神经支配术(RDN)是否能改善难治性高血压患者的动脉僵硬度、中心血压(C-BP)和心率变异性(HRV)。
ReSET是一项随机、假手术对照、双盲试验(NCT01459900)。RDN由一位经验丰富的操作人员使用美敦力单极Symplicity Flex导管进行。使用SphygmoCor设备在基线期和6个月后获取C-BP、颈股脉搏波速度(PWV)和HRV。
本亚组研究纳入了53例患者(占ReSET队列的77%)。两组在基线时相似(假手术组/RDN组):n = 27/n = 26;男性占78/65%;年龄59±9/54±8岁(均值±标准差);肱动脉收缩压158±18/154±17 mmHg;24小时动态收缩压153±14/151±13 mmHg。6个月后,PWV的变化(假手术组为0.1±1.9 vs. RDN组为-0.6±1.3 m/s)、收缩期C-BP的变化(假手术组为-2±17 vs. RDN组为-8±16 mmHg)、舒张期C-BP的变化(假手术组为-2±9 vs. RDN组为-5±9 mmHg)以及增强指数的变化(假手术组为0.7±7.0 vs. RDN组为1.0±7.4%)均无显著差异。HRV参数的变化也无显著差异。基线HRV或PWV不能预测RDN后的血压反应。
在假手术对照的情况下,RDN对动脉僵硬度、C-BP和HRV无显著影响。因此,RDN对大动脉和心脏自主神经活动有不依赖于血压的影响这一观点未得到支持。