Suppr超能文献

评估动脉僵硬度以预测肾交感神经去神经支配对血压反应。

Assessment of arterial stiffness to predict blood pressure response to renal sympathetic denervation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 7;18(8):e686-e694. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01036.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent trials support the efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) to reduce blood pressure (BP). Nevertheless, about one third of patients are considered non-responders to RDN. Previous retrospective analyses suggest arterial stiffness could predict BP response to RDN.

AIMS

We prospectively assessed the potential of invasive pulse wave velocity (iPWV) to predict BP response to RDN. Additionally, we aimed to establish non-invasive models based on arterial stiffness to predict BP response to RDN.

METHODS

iPWV, magnetic resonance imaging-based markers of arterial stiffness and the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were recorded prior to RDN in patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Changes in daytime BP after 3 months were analysed according to the prespecified iPWV cut-off (14.4 m/s). Regression analyses were used to establish models for non-invasive prediction of BP response. Results were compared to iPWV as reference and were then validated in an external patient cohort.

RESULTS

Eighty patients underwent stiffness assessment before RDN. After 3 months, systolic 24h and daytime BP were reduced by 13.6±9.8 mmHg and 14.7±10.6 mmHg in patients with low iPWV, versus 6.2±13.3 mmHg and 6.3±12.8 mmHg in those with high iPWV (p<0.001 for both). Upon regression analysis, logarithmic ascending aortic distensibility and systolic baseline BP independently predicted BP change at follow-up. Both were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

iPWV is an independent predictor for BP response after RDN. In addition, BP change prediction following RDN using non-invasive measures is feasible. This could facilitate patient selection for RDN treatment.

摘要

背景

最近的试验支持肾交感神经切除术(RDN)降低血压(BP)的疗效。然而,约三分之一的患者被认为对 RDN 无反应。先前的回顾性分析表明,动脉僵硬度可以预测 RDN 对 BP 的反应。

目的

我们前瞻性评估了侵入性脉搏波速度(iPWV)预测 RDN 对 BP 反应的潜力。此外,我们旨在建立基于动脉僵硬度的无创模型,以预测 RDN 对 BP 的反应。

方法

在难治性高血压患者接受 RDN 治疗之前,记录 iPWV、基于磁共振成像的动脉僵硬度标志物和颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度。根据预先指定的 iPWV 截止值(14.4 m/s)分析 3 个月后白天 BP 的变化。回归分析用于建立无创预测 BP 反应的模型。结果与 iPWV 进行比较,并在外部患者队列中进行验证。

结果

80 例患者在 RDN 前接受了僵硬度评估。在 3 个月后,iPWV 较低的患者 24 小时收缩压和白天收缩压分别降低了 13.6±9.8 mmHg 和 14.7±10.6 mmHg,而 iPWV 较高的患者分别降低了 6.2±13.3 mmHg 和 6.3±12.8 mmHg(两者均<0.001)。回归分析显示,对数升主动脉扩张度和收缩压基线 BP 独立预测随访时的 BP 变化。在验证队列中均得到证实。

结论

iPWV 是 RDN 后 BP 反应的独立预测因子。此外,使用无创措施预测 RDN 后 BP 变化是可行的。这可能有助于 RDN 治疗的患者选择。

相似文献

7
Vascular and renal hemodynamic changes after renal denervation.肾去神经后血管和肾脏血流动力学的变化。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;8(7):1195-201. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08500812. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
10

引用本文的文献

5
Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception.生理学、病理生理学和内感受中的肾神经
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2025 Jan;21(1):57-69. doi: 10.1038/s41581-024-00893-3. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
6
Advances on the Experimental Research in Resistant Hypertension.抗高血压的实验研究进展。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):475-482. doi: 10.1007/s11906-024-01315-2. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Noninvasive Estimation of Aortic Stiffness Through Different Approaches.通过不同方法无创性估测主动脉僵硬度。
Hypertension. 2019 Jul;74(1):117-129. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12853. Epub 2019 May 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验