Suppr超能文献

在无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者中,颈外动脉和颈内动脉狭窄的进展与缺血性神经事件的较高风险相关。

Progression of external and internal carotid artery stenosis is associated with a higher risk of ischemic neurologic events in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Masoomi Reza, Shah Zubair, Dawn Buddhadeb, Vamanan Karthik, Nanjundappa Aravinda, Gupta Kamal

机构信息

1 Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

2 Mid America Heart & Lung Surgeons, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Vasc Med. 2017 Oct;22(5):418-423. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17722626. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

Abstract

A small percentage of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) who are on optimal medical management do go on to develop ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (IS/TIA). Several diagnostic tools have been studied to identify those patients who are at increased risk. However, most of these diagnostic tools are not available for routine clinical use or are resource intensive. We performed a retrospective study to assess the incremental value of external carotid artery stenosis progression (ECASP) along with internal carotid artery stenosis progression (ICASP) in predicting risk of ipsilateral IS/TIA in a cohort of patients with ACAS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with ACAS who had at least two serial duplex ultrasounds (DUS) at our center. A total of 356 patients (712 carotid arteries) were included in the study (mean age 74.7±9 years, 49.2% male) with a mean follow-up of 60.7±32.7 months. In univariate analysis, concurrent progression of ICA and ECA stenosis on the same side arteries was associated with a very significant increased risk of ipsilateral IS/TIA (14.7% vs 4.6%, p<0.001). Also, multivariable regression analysis showed that concurrent ECA/ICA progression was an independent predictor of IS/TIA (OR=3.6, 95% CI 1.64-7.8; p=0.001). ECASP along with ICASP is significantly associated with increased risk of ipsilateral IS/TIA and provides incremental risk stratification over that provided by ICASP alone. The ECA is routinely evaluated in clinical practice, and it could serve as an additional marker for identifying higher risk patients with ACAS.

摘要

一小部分接受最佳药物治疗的无症状颈动脉狭窄(ACAS)患者确实会发展为缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(IS/TIA)。已经研究了几种诊断工具来识别那些风险增加的患者。然而,这些诊断工具中的大多数无法用于常规临床使用或资源密集。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估颈外动脉狭窄进展(ECASP)以及颈内动脉狭窄进展(ICASP)在预测ACAS患者队列中同侧IS/TIA风险方面的增量价值。我们对在我们中心至少进行过两次连续双功超声(DUS)检查的ACAS患者进行了回顾性分析。共有356例患者(712条颈动脉)纳入研究(平均年龄74.7±9岁,男性占49.2%),平均随访60.7±32.7个月。在单变量分析中,同侧颈内动脉和颈外动脉狭窄的同时进展与同侧IS/TIA风险显著增加相关(14.7%对4.6%,p<0.001)。此外,多变量回归分析表明,颈外动脉/颈内动脉同时进展是IS/TIA的独立预测因素(OR=3.6,95%CI 1.64-7.8;p=0.001)。ECASP与ICASP一起与同侧IS/TIA风险增加显著相关,并提供了比单独ICASP更高的风险分层。颈外动脉在临床实践中经常进行评估,它可以作为识别ACAS高危患者的额外标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验