Suppr超能文献

常规超声联合超声造影在诊断甲状腺乳头状癌中的优势

Advantages of Routine Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosing Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

作者信息

Li Fengsheng, Wang Yunmei, Bai Baoyan, Wang Shengli, Liu Shuguang

机构信息

*Department of Ultrasound, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an; †Department of Ultrasound, Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital, Yan'an; and ‡Department of Orthopaedics, Hong Hui Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Ultrasound Q. 2017 Sep;33(3):213-218. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000309.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the advantages of routine ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), and the combination of these 2 methods in diagnosing papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We subjected 89 patients with calcified thyroid nodules to conventional US and CEUS and then retrospectively analyzed the US and CEUS features of 89 patients with single, solid PTC. On this basis, we then evaluated the ability of US, CEUS, and their combination to diagnose PTC. In the 89 patients with thyroid nodules, US findings differed significantly from CEUS findings (P < 0.05). In the US group, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87.5%, 78.8%, and 88.0%, respectively; in the CEUS group, these values were 92.9% (P < 0.05), 87.9% (P < 0.05), and 92.9% (P < 0.05), respectively; and when the methods were combined, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.7%, 92.7%, and 94.9%, respectively. A typical PTC nodule can be definitively diagnosed using US and CEUS; more specifically, the features of slow progression, late enhancement, and low enhancement were highly associated with a diagnosis of PTC. When these features were combined, they exhibited higher diagnostic performance than any individual method.

摘要

本研究旨在评估常规超声(US)、超声造影(CEUS)以及这两种方法联合使用在诊断甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)方面的优势。我们对89例甲状腺钙化结节患者进行了常规超声和超声造影检查,然后回顾性分析了89例单发实性PTC患者的超声和超声造影特征。在此基础上,我们评估了超声、超声造影及其联合使用诊断PTC的能力。在89例甲状腺结节患者中,超声检查结果与超声造影检查结果差异显著(P<0.05)。在超声组中,诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为87.5%、78.8%和88.0%;在超声造影组中,这些值分别为92.9%(P<0.05)、87.9%(P<0.05)和92.9%(P<0.05);当两种方法联合使用时,诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.7%、92.7%和94.9%。典型的PTC结节可通过超声和超声造影明确诊断;更具体地说,进展缓慢、延迟增强和低增强特征与PTC诊断高度相关。当这些特征联合使用时,它们的诊断性能高于任何单一方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验