Department of Ultrasonic Diagnosis, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Department of Ultrasonic Diagnosis, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Feb;46(2):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
We explored the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), studying nodular growths according to size via 3-D color Doppler US (3-DCDUS) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). A total of 109 patients undergoing CEUS and surgery of thyroid nodules at the First Hospital of China Medical University between January 2017 and December 2018 were selected for the study, including 77 with post-operative pathologically confirmed PTMC (test group) and 32 with nodular goiter (controls). All nodules were ≤1.0 cm in maximum diameter. After 3-DCDUS, each patient underwent Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) grading. In both groups, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of anteroposterior (AP) nodule diameters was conducted, establishing a cutpoint for probable malignancy by CEUS. In the test group (n = 77), grading was as follows: TI-RADS 4a, 23; TI-RADS 4b, 40; TI-RADS 4c, 14. More patients had heterogeneous enhancement or hypo-enhancement (n = 55) than uniform hyper-enhancement or uniform iso-enhancement (n = 22) by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Control group (n = 32) grading was as follows: TI-RADS 3, 1; TI-RADS 4, 21; TI-RADS 4b, 10. Fewer patients had heterogeneous enhancement or hypo-enhancement (n = 12) than uniform hyper-enhancement or uniform iso-enhancement (n = 20) by CEUS. The diagnostic accuracy of 3-DCDUS or CEUS differed significantly from that of 3-DCD-US + CEUS (p < 0.05), whereas 3-DCDUS and CEUS performed similarly (p > 0.05). At AP diameters of 0.66 cm, the Youden index for diagnosing malignancy by CEUS was maximal. When nodules below this threshold were excluded, both CEUS and 3-DCDUS + CEUS improved significantly in diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.05). CEUS is useful in determining the status (benign vs. malignant) of thyroid nodules, with significantly better accuracy at AP diameters ≥0.66 cm.
我们通过三维彩色多普勒超声(3-DCDUS)和对比增强超声(CEUS)研究结节的生长情况,探讨了超声在甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)中的诊断准确性。该研究共纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在中国医科大学第一医院接受 CEUS 和甲状腺结节手术的 109 例患者,包括术后病理证实为 PTMC 的 77 例(试验组)和结节性甲状腺肿的 32 例(对照组)。所有结节最大直径均≤1.0cm。在 3-DCDUS 后,每位患者均进行甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)分级。在两组中,均进行前后径(AP)结节直径的受试者工作特征曲线分析,确定 CEUS 可能恶性的截断点。在试验组(n=77)中,分级如下:TI-RADS 4a,23;TI-RADS 4b,40;TI-RADS 4c,14。通过对比增强超声(CEUS),更多患者表现为异质性增强或低增强(n=55),而非均匀高增强或均匀等增强(n=22)。对照组(n=32)的分级如下:TI-RADS 3,1;TI-RADS 4,21;TI-RADS 4b,10。通过 CEUS,更多患者表现为异质性增强或低增强(n=12),而非均匀高增强或均匀等增强(n=20)。3-DCDUS 或 CEUS 的诊断准确性与 3-DCD-US+CEUS 相比有显著差异(p<0.05),而 3-DCDUS 和 CEUS 表现相似(p>0.05)。在 AP 直径为 0.66cm 时,CEUS 诊断恶性肿瘤的 Youden 指数最大。当排除低于此阈值的结节时,CEUS 和 3-DCD-US+CEUS 的诊断准确性均显著提高(p<0.05)。CEUS 有助于确定甲状腺结节的状态(良性 vs.恶性),在 AP 直径≥0.66cm 时准确性显著提高。