• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年慢性难治性便秘骶神经调节的成本效益:马尔可夫模型分析。

Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for chronic refractory constipation in children and adolescents: a Markov model analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1111/codi.13869.

DOI:10.1111/codi.13869
PMID:28834055
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) compared with conservative treatment in children and adolescents with constipation refractory to conservative management.

METHOD

A Markov probabilistic model was used, comparing costs and effectiveness of SNM and conservative treatment in children and adolescents aged 10-18 years with constipation refractory to conservative management. Input for the model regarding transition probabilities, utilities and healthcare costs was based on data from a cohort of patients treated in our centre. This cohort consisted of 30 female patients (mean age 16 years) with functional constipation refractory to conservative management. The mean duration of laxative use in this group was 5.9 years. All patients had a test SNM, followed by a permanent SNM in 27/30. Median follow-up was 22.1 months (range 12.2-36.8). The model was run to simulate a follow-up period of 3 years.

RESULTS

The mean cumulative costs for the SNM group and the conservative treatment group were €17 789 (SD €2492) and €7574 (SD €4332) per patient, respectively. The mean quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in the SNM group was 1.74 (SD 0.19), compared with 0.86 (SD 0.14) in the conservatively managed group. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €12 328 per QALY (SD €4788). Sensitivity analysis showed that the outcomes were robust to a wide range of model assumptions.

CONCLUSION

Chronic constipation seriously affects the quality of life of children and adolescents. Preliminary evidence suggests that SNM can improve symptoms and quality of life at a reasonable cost.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估骶神经调节(SNM)与保守治疗相比在保守治疗无效的儿童和青少年便秘中的成本效益。

方法

采用马尔可夫概率模型,比较了保守治疗和 SNM 在保守治疗无效的 10-18 岁儿童和青少年便秘中的成本和效果。模型中关于转移概率、效用和医疗保健成本的输入数据基于我们中心治疗的患者队列数据。该队列包括 30 名(平均年龄 16 岁)功能性便秘且保守治疗无效的女性患者。该组患者使用泻药的平均持续时间为 5.9 年。所有患者均接受了测试性 SNM,随后 27/30 名患者接受了永久性 SNM。中位随访时间为 22.1 个月(范围 12.2-36.8)。模型运行模拟了 3 年的随访期。

结果

SNM 组和保守治疗组的平均累积成本分别为每位患者 17789 欧元(标准差 2492 欧元)和 7574 欧元(标准差 4332 欧元)。SNM 组的平均质量调整生命年(QALY)为 1.74(标准差 0.19),而保守治疗组为 0.86(标准差 0.14)。平均增量成本效益比为每 QALY 12328 欧元(标准差 4788 欧元)。敏感性分析表明,结果对模型假设的广泛范围具有稳健性。

结论

慢性便秘严重影响儿童和青少年的生活质量。初步证据表明,SNM 可以以合理的成本改善症状和生活质量。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for chronic refractory constipation in children and adolescents: a Markov model analysis.儿童和青少年慢性难治性便秘骶神经调节的成本效益:马尔可夫模型分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1111/codi.13869.
2
Sacral neuromodulation in children and adolescents with chronic constipation refractory to conservative treatment.保守治疗无效的儿童和青少年慢性便秘的骶神经调节治疗
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2604-8. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
Sacral neuromodulation versus personalized conservative treatment in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation: study protocol of the No.2-trial, a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.骶神经调节与特发性慢传输型便秘患者的个体化保守治疗比较:第 2 试验方案,一项多中心开放标签随机对照临床试验和成本效益分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2978-x. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
4
Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic slow-transit constipation: a systematic review.骶神经调节治疗特发性慢传输型便秘的有效性、安全性和成本效益:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar;26(3):417-427. doi: 10.1111/codi.16876. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
5
Long-term outcome of intractable constipation treated by sacral neuromodulation: a comparison between children and adults.经骶神经刺激治疗的难治性便秘的长期疗效:儿童与成人的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;20(2):134-143. doi: 10.1111/codi.13837.
6
Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation compared to botulinum neurotoxin a or continued medical management in refractory overactive bladder.骶神经调节与肉毒杆菌神经毒素 A 或继续药物治疗对难治性膀胱过度活动症的成本效益比较。
Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.08.006.
7
Noninvasive Sacral Neuromodulation in Children and Adolescents: A Case-Control Study of Patients With Chronic Refractory Constipation.儿童和青少年的无创骶神经调节:慢性难治性便秘患者的病例对照研究
Neuromodulation. 2023 Dec;26(8):1858-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.451. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
8
Sacral Neuromodulation Versus Conservative Treatment for Refractory Idiopathic Slow-transit Constipation: The Randomized Clinical No.2-Trial.骶神经调节与保守治疗难治性特发性慢传输性便秘的随机对照临床研究 No.2。
Ann Surg. 2024 May 1;279(5):746-754. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006158. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A treatment for patients with idiopathic overactive bladder.骶神经调节与肉毒毒素 A 治疗特发性逼尿症患者的成本效果分析。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(4):558-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09905.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
10
Sacral neuromodulation for constipation and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents - study protocol of a prospective, randomized trial on the application of invasive vs. non-invasive technique.儿童和青少年便秘和粪便失禁的骶神经调节 - 前瞻性、随机试验中侵袭性与非侵袭性技术应用的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 22;25(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08052-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary Landscape of Medical Technology in Gastroenterology Between 2013 and 2023.2013年至2023年胃肠病学领域的当代医学技术概况
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003359.
2
Towards a definition of refractory/therapy-resistant/intractable constipation in children: a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, online survey.关于儿童难治性/治疗抵抗性/顽固性便秘的定义:一项基于问卷的横断面在线调查。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Dec 12;8(1):e003063. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003063.
3
Economic Evaluations of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Treating Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Scoping Review.
治疗肠-脑相互作用障碍的非药物干预措施的经济学评估:一项范围综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Mar;43(3):249-269. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01455-y. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
How do we define therapy-resistant constipation in children aged 4-18 years old? A systematic review with meta-narrative synthesis.如何定义 4-18 岁儿童的治疗抵抗性便秘?系统评价与元叙述综合。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jun 6;8(1):e002380. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002380.
5
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Model Shows Superiority of Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Without a Separate Trial.成本效益模型显示,无需单独试验即可进行无线脊髓刺激植入术具有优越性。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):596-603. doi: 10.1111/ner.13102. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
7
Comparison of antegrade continence enema treatment and sacral nerve stimulation for children with severe functional constipation and fecal incontinence.对比经肛门持续灌洗和骶神经刺激治疗儿童严重功能性便秘伴大便失禁的疗效。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Aug;32(8):e13809. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13809. Epub 2020 Feb 3.