• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶神经调节与特发性慢传输型便秘患者的个体化保守治疗比较:第 2 试验方案,一项多中心开放标签随机对照临床试验和成本效益分析。

Sacral neuromodulation versus personalized conservative treatment in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation: study protocol of the No.2-trial, a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2978-x. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-018-2978-x
PMID:29470731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859034/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The evidence regarding the (cost-)effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with therapy-resistant idiopathic slow-transit constipation is of suboptimal quality. The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports has granted conditional reimbursement for SNM treatment. The objective is to assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of SNM compared to personalized conservative treatment (PCT) in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation refractory to conservative treatment.

METHODS

This study is an open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 14 to 80 with slow-transit constipation, a defecation frequency (DF) < 3 per week and meeting at least one other Rome-IV criterion, are eligible. Patients with obstructed outlet, irritable bowel syndrome, bowel pathology, or rectal prolapse are excluded. Patients are randomized to SNM or PCT. The primary outcome is success at 6 months (DF ≥ 3 a week), requiring a sample size of 64 (α = 0.05, β = 0.80, 30% difference in success). Secondary outcomes are straining, sense of incomplete evacuation, constipation severity, fatigue, constipation specific and generic quality of life, and costs at 6 months. Long-term costs and effectiveness will be estimated by a decision analytic model. The time frame is 57 months, starting October 2016. SNM treatment costs are funded by the Dutch conditional reimbursement program, research costs by Medtronic.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this trial will be used to make a final decision regarding reimbursement of SNM from the Dutch Health Care Package in this patient group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov , identifier NCT02961582, on 12 October 2016.

摘要

目的

对于治疗抵抗性特发性慢传输型便秘患者,骶神经调节(SNM)的(成本)效性证据质量欠佳。荷兰卫生部、福利和体育部已批准 SNM 治疗的有条件报销。本研究旨在评估 SNM 与个性化保守治疗(PCT)相比在保守治疗无效的特发性慢传输型便秘患者中的有效性、成本效益和预算影响。

方法

这是一项开放标签、多中心随机对照试验。年龄在 14 至 80 岁之间、慢传输型便秘、排便频率(DF)<每周 3 次且符合至少另一项罗马 IV 标准的患者有资格参加。排除有出口梗阻、肠易激综合征、肠道病变或直肠前突的患者。患者被随机分配到 SNM 或 PCT 组。主要结局为 6 个月时的成功率(DF≥每周 3 次),需要样本量为 64 例(α=0.05,β=0.80,成功率差异为 30%)。次要结局为排便费力、排便不尽感、便秘严重程度、疲劳、便秘特异性和一般性生活质量以及 6 个月时的成本。长期成本和效果将通过决策分析模型进行估计。时间框架为 57 个月,从 2016 年 10 月开始。SNM 治疗费用由荷兰有条件报销计划支付,研究费用由美敦力公司支付。

结论

本试验的结果将用于在这组患者中对 SNM 从荷兰医疗保健计划中进行最终报销的决策。

试验注册

本试验于 2016 年 10 月 12 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,标识符为 NCT02961582。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0084/5859034/816586e2f9bf/384_2018_2978_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0084/5859034/2ae95c8ba52d/384_2018_2978_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0084/5859034/816586e2f9bf/384_2018_2978_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0084/5859034/2ae95c8ba52d/384_2018_2978_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0084/5859034/816586e2f9bf/384_2018_2978_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sacral neuromodulation versus personalized conservative treatment in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation: study protocol of the No.2-trial, a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.骶神经调节与特发性慢传输型便秘患者的个体化保守治疗比较:第 2 试验方案,一项多中心开放标签随机对照临床试验和成本效益分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2978-x. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
2
Sacral Neuromodulation Versus Conservative Treatment for Refractory Idiopathic Slow-transit Constipation: The Randomized Clinical No.2-Trial.骶神经调节与保守治疗难治性特发性慢传输性便秘的随机对照临床研究 No.2。
Ann Surg. 2024 May 1;279(5):746-754. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006158. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3
Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic slow-transit constipation: a systematic review.骶神经调节治疗特发性慢传输型便秘的有效性、安全性和成本效益:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar;26(3):417-427. doi: 10.1111/codi.16876. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
4
Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for chronic refractory constipation in children and adolescents: a Markov model analysis.儿童和青少年慢性难治性便秘骶神经调节的成本效益:马尔可夫模型分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1111/codi.13869.
5
Long-term outcome of intractable constipation treated by sacral neuromodulation: a comparison between children and adults.经骶神经刺激治疗的难治性便秘的长期疗效:儿童与成人的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;20(2):134-143. doi: 10.1111/codi.13837.
6
Sacral nerve stimulation for intractable constipation.骶神经刺激治疗难治性便秘。
Gut. 2010 Mar;59(3):333-40. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.187989.
7
Sacral neuromodulation therapy: a promising treatment for adolescents with refractory functional constipation.骶神经调节治疗:一种治疗青少年难治性功能性便秘的有前途的方法。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Mar;55(3):278-85. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182405c61.
8
Sacral neuromodulation in children and adolescents with chronic constipation refractory to conservative treatment.保守治疗无效的儿童和青少年慢性便秘的骶神经调节治疗
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2604-8. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
9
Sacral nerve stimulation in slow-transit constipation: effectiveness at 5-year follow-up.骶神经刺激治疗慢传输型便秘:5 年随访结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Sep;34(9):1529-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03351-w. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
10
Sacral neuromodulation for constipation and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents - study protocol of a prospective, randomized trial on the application of invasive vs. non-invasive technique.儿童和青少年便秘和粪便失禁的骶神经调节 - 前瞻性、随机试验中侵袭性与非侵袭性技术应用的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 22;25(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08052-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatments for intractable constipation in childhood.儿童难治性便秘的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 19;6(6):CD014580. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014580.pub2.
2
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
3
Sacral Neuromodulation Versus Conservative Treatment for Refractory Idiopathic Slow-transit Constipation: The Randomized Clinical No.2-Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation.随机对照临床试验:骶神经刺激治疗难治性便秘
Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):205-213. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10326. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Sacral Nerve Stimulation Fails to Offer Long-term Benefit in Patients With Slow-Transit Constipation.骶神经刺激对慢传输型便秘患者无长期益处。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):878-85. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000653.
3
Sacral neuromodulation in children and adolescents with chronic constipation refractory to conservative treatment.
骶神经调节与保守治疗难治性特发性慢传输性便秘的随机对照临床研究 No.2。
Ann Surg. 2024 May 1;279(5):746-754. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006158. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
4
Stapled trans-anal rectal resection can improve constipation symptoms and inflammatory reaction of patients with outlet obstructive constipation.吻合器经肛门直肠切除术可改善出口梗阻型便秘患者的便秘症状及炎症反应。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):11472-11481. eCollection 2021.
5
Sacral nerve stimulation in slow-transit constipation: effectiveness at 5-year follow-up.骶神经刺激治疗慢传输型便秘:5 年随访结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Sep;34(9):1529-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03351-w. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: long-term outcomes.经直肠骶神经刺激治疗便秘:长期疗效。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jun;23(6):559-564. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02011-z. Epub 2019 May 30.
保守治疗无效的儿童和青少年慢性便秘的骶神经调节治疗
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2604-8. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
4
Bowel Disorders.肠道疾病
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031.
5
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults.成人粪失禁和便秘的骶神经刺激治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD004464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004464.pub3.
6
How many segments are necessary to characterize delayed colonic transit time?需要多少段来表征结肠传输时间延迟?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;30(10):1381-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2277-8. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
7
Treatment efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in slow transit constipation: a two-phase, double-blind randomized controlled crossover study.骶神经刺激治疗慢传输型便秘的疗效:一项两阶段、双盲随机对照交叉研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):733-40. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.101. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
The technique of sacral nerve modulation.骶神经调节技术。
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Apr;17(4):O88-94. doi: 10.1111/codi.12900.
9
Constipation-related direct medical costs in 16 887 patients newly diagnosed with chronic constipation.16887例新诊断慢性便秘患者的便秘相关直接医疗费用。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;26(11):1260-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000167.
10
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.预算影响分析——良好实践原则:ISPOR 2012 预算影响分析良好实践 II 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13.