• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在安全圈框架下进行培训是否能增强婴幼儿及家庭工作者的关系理解能力?

DOES TRAINING IN THE CIRCLE OF SECURITY FRAMEWORK INCREASE RELATIONAL UNDERSTANDING IN INFANT/CHILD AND FAMILY WORKERS?

作者信息

McMahon Catherine, Huber Anna, Kohlhoff Jane, Camberis Anna-Lisa

机构信息

Macquarie University.

University of New South Wales, Sydney, and Karitane, New SouthWales.

出版信息

Infant Ment Health J. 2017 Sep;38(5):658-668. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21661. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1002/imhj.21661
PMID:28834602
Abstract

This article evaluated whether attendance at Circle of Security training workshops resulted in attendees showing greater empathy and attachment-related knowledge and understanding, and fewer judgmental responses to viewing a stressful parent-child interaction. Participants were 202 practitioners who attended and completed a 2-day (n = 70), 4-day (n = 105), or 10-day (n = 27) COS training workshop in Australia or New Zealand in 2015. In a pre/post design, participant reactions to a video clip of a challenging parent-child interaction were coded for empathic, judgmental, or attachment-focused language. Attachment understanding was coded in response to questions about the greatest challenge that the dyad faced. In all training conditions, participants provided significantly more attachment-focused descriptors and showed significantly greater attachment understanding after training, but significantly fewer empathic descriptors. While participants at the longer workshops provided significantly fewer judgmental/critical descriptors, there was no change for those attending the 2-day workshop. Irrespective of workshop duration or professional background, participants took a more relational perspective on the vignette after the training workshops. More detailed research is required to establish the extent to which this increased knowledge and understanding is retained and integrated into infant mental health practice with parents and young children.

摘要

本文评估了参加“安全圈”培训工作坊是否会使参与者表现出更强的同理心、与依恋相关的知识和理解,以及在观看紧张的亲子互动时减少评判性反应。参与者为202名从业者,他们于2015年在澳大利亚或新西兰参加并完成了为期2天(n = 70)、4天(n = 105)或10天(n = 27)的“安全圈”培训工作坊。在前后测设计中,对参与者针对一段具有挑战性的亲子互动视频片段的反应进行编码,以分析其中的同理心、评判性或依恋相关语言。根据关于亲子关系面临的最大挑战的问题回答对依恋理解进行编码。在所有培训条件下,参与者在培训后提供了显著更多的依恋相关描述词,表现出显著更强的依恋理解,但同理心描述词显著减少。虽然参加较长工作坊的参与者提供的评判性/批判性描述词显著减少,但参加2天工作坊的参与者没有变化。无论工作坊时长或专业背景如何,参与者在培训工作坊后对案例采取了更具关系性的视角。需要进行更详细的研究,以确定这种增加的知识和理解在多大程度上得以保留并融入针对父母和幼儿的婴儿心理健康实践中。

相似文献

1
DOES TRAINING IN THE CIRCLE OF SECURITY FRAMEWORK INCREASE RELATIONAL UNDERSTANDING IN INFANT/CHILD AND FAMILY WORKERS?在安全圈框架下进行培训是否能增强婴幼儿及家庭工作者的关系理解能力?
Infant Ment Health J. 2017 Sep;38(5):658-668. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21661. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
2
EFFICACY OF THE 20-WEEK CIRCLE OF SECURITY INTERVENTION: CHANGES IN CAREGIVER REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING, REPRESENTATIONS, AND CHILD ATTACHMENT IN AN AUSTRALIAN CLINICAL SAMPLE.20周安全圈干预的效果:澳大利亚临床样本中照顾者反思功能、表征及儿童依恋的变化
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):556-74. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21540. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Parent and practitioner perspectives on Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P): A qualitative study.家长和实践者对安全感养育法(COS-P)的看法:一项定性研究。
Infant Ment Health J. 2021 May;42(3):452-468. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21916. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
4
OBSERVING THE INFLUENCE OF MINDFULNESS AND ATTACHMENT STYLES THROUGH MOTHER AND INFANT INTERACTION: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY.通过母婴互动观察正念和依恋风格的影响:一项纵向研究
Infant Ment Health J. 2017 May;38(3):343-350. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21645. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Does knowing translate to doing? Practitioners' experiences of Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) training and implementation.知道是否等同于做到?从业者对安全圈-父母培训(COS-P)的体验及其实施。
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 May;41(3):393-410. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21852. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
6
Attachment & Child Health (ATTACH) pilot trials: Effect of parental reflective function intervention for families affected by toxic stress.附件与儿童健康(ATTACH)试点研究:针对受毒性压力影响家庭的父母反射功能干预的效果。
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 Jul;41(4):445-462. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21833. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
7
INTERFACING INFANT MENTAL HEALTH KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS: REFLECTIONS ON THE NARRATIVES OF LAY HOME VISITORS' EXPERIENCES OF LEARNING AND APPLYING RELATIONAL CONCEPTS OF DEVELOPMENT IN A SOUTH AFRICAN INTERVENTION PROGRAM.衔接婴儿心理健康知识体系:对南非一项干预项目中居家访视员学习与应用发展性关系概念的经验叙述的思考
Infant Ment Health J. 2016 Jul;37(4):424-39. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21566. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
BUILDING A WORKFORCE COMPETENCY-BASED TRAINING PROGRAM IN INFANT/EARLY CHILDHOOD MENTAL HEALTH.构建基于劳动力能力的婴幼儿心理健康培训项目。
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):623-31. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21535. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
Infant mental health home visiting in the context of an infant-toddler court team: Changes in parental responsiveness and reflective functioning.在婴幼儿法庭团队背景下的婴幼儿心理健康家访:父母反应能力和反思功能的变化。
Infant Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;40(4):523-540. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21785. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
SUPPORTING PRETERM INFANT ATTACHMENT AND SOCIOEMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: STAFF PERCEPTIONS.新生儿重症监护病房中支持早产儿的依恋和社会情感发展:工作人员的看法
Infant Ment Health J. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):160-71. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21556. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting interactive skills and mind-mindedness among early childcare professionals: study protocol for a randomized wait-list controlled trial comparing the Circle of Security approach with care as usual in center-based childcare (the SECURE project).促进早期儿童保育专业人员的互动技能和心理共鸣:一项随机等待名单对照试验的研究方案,比较基于中心的儿童保育中的“安全感圈”方法与常规护理(SECURE 项目)。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 18;10(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00835-3.
2
Addressing the Evidence Gap: Protocol for an Effectiveness Study of Circle of Security Parenting, an Attachment-Based Intervention.填补证据空白:一项基于依恋的干预措施——安全圈育儿法有效性研究的方案
Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Oct 22;1:575752. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.575752. eCollection 2020.