• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进早期儿童保育专业人员的互动技能和心理共鸣:一项随机等待名单对照试验的研究方案,比较基于中心的儿童保育中的“安全感圈”方法与常规护理(SECURE 项目)。

Promoting interactive skills and mind-mindedness among early childcare professionals: study protocol for a randomized wait-list controlled trial comparing the Circle of Security approach with care as usual in center-based childcare (the SECURE project).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Health, VIVE-The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 18;10(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00835-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-022-00835-3
PMID:35717243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9206123/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In countries where the majority of young children are enrolled in professional childcare, the childcare setting constitutes an important part of children's caregiving environment. Research consistently shows that particularly the quality of the daily interactions and relationship between young children and their professional caregivers have long-term effects on a range of developmental child outcomes. Therefore, professional caregivers' capacity for establishing high quality interactions with the children in their care is an important target of intervention.

METHODS

A prospective, parallel, cluster-randomized wait-list controlled trial is used to test the efficacy of the attachment- and mentalization theory informed Circle of Security (COS) approach adapted to the childcare setting (COS-Classroom) on caregiver interactive skills and mind-mindedness. Participants are professional caregivers of children aged 0-2.9 years working in center-based childcare in Denmark. Approximately 31 childcare centers, corresponding to an estimated 113 caregivers, are expected to participate. The primary outcome is caregiver Sensitive responsiveness measured with the Caregiver Interactive Profile Scales (CIP-scales). Secondary outcomes include caregiver Mind-mindedness, the five remaining CIP-scales (Respect for autonomy, Structure and limit setting, Verbal communication, Developmental stimulation, and Fostering positive peer interactions), and caregivers' resources to cope with work-related stress. Data on structural factors (e.g., staff stability, caregiver-child ratio, and level of pre-service education), caregiver attachment style, acceptability and feasibility of the COS-C together with qualitative data on how the participants experience the COS-C is additionally collected to investigate moderating and confounding effects.

DISCUSSION

Examining the effectiveness of the COS-C in center-based childcare contributes to the knowledge of evidence-based intervention programs and can potentially improve the caregiver quality early childcare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04654533. Prospectively registered December 4, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04654533 .

摘要

背景

在大多数幼儿都入读专业儿童看护机构的国家,儿童看护机构构成了儿童照护环境的重要组成部分。研究一致表明,幼儿与专业照护者之间日常互动和关系的质量对一系列儿童发展结果具有长期影响。因此,专业照护者与照护儿童建立高质量互动的能力是干预的一个重要目标。

方法

采用前瞻性、平行、集群随机对照试验,测试依恋和心理化理论指导的安全圈(COS)方法应用于儿童看护环境(COS-Classroom)对照护者互动技能和心理化能力的效果。参与者是在丹麦中心式儿童看护机构工作的 0-2.9 岁儿童的专业照护者。预计将有大约 31 个儿童看护中心,对应约 113 名照护者参与。主要结果是使用照顾者互动特征量表(CIP-scales)测量的照顾者敏感反应性。次要结果包括照顾者心理化能力、其余 5 个 CIP 量表(自主尊重、结构和限制设定、言语交流、发展刺激和促进积极同伴互动),以及照顾者应对工作相关压力的资源。还收集了关于结构性因素(如员工稳定性、照护者与儿童比例以及职前教育水平)、照顾者依恋风格、COS-C 的可接受性和可行性以及参与者对 COS-C 的体验的定性数据,以调查调节和混杂效应。

讨论

检验 COS-C 在中心式儿童看护中的有效性有助于了解基于证据的干预计划,并有可能改善早期儿童看护的照护者质量。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04654533。于 2020 年 12 月 4 日前瞻性注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04654533。

相似文献

1
Promoting interactive skills and mind-mindedness among early childcare professionals: study protocol for a randomized wait-list controlled trial comparing the Circle of Security approach with care as usual in center-based childcare (the SECURE project).促进早期儿童保育专业人员的互动技能和心理共鸣:一项随机等待名单对照试验的研究方案,比较基于中心的儿童保育中的“安全感圈”方法与常规护理(SECURE 项目)。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 18;10(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00835-3.
2
A randomized trial of the Caregiver Interaction Profile (CIP) training with childcare providers: the Copenhagen Daycare Project study protocol.一项针对儿童照护提供者的照顾者互动评估(CIP)培训的随机试验:哥本哈根日托项目研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Mar 6;12(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01568-1.
3
Mind-Mindedness of Male and Female Caregivers in Childcare and the Relation to Sensitivity and Attachment: An Exploratory Study.育儿中男女照料者的心理-mindedness及其与敏感性和依恋的关系:一项探索性研究。 (注:原文中“Mind-Mindedness”可能是个特定专业术语,这里直接保留英文未翻译,因为不清楚准确对应的中文表述,你可根据实际情况补充完整准确翻译)
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Aug;48(Pt B):134-146. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
A Model of Intervention and Implementation of Quality Building and Quality Control in Childcare Centers to Strengthen the Mental Health and Development of 1-3-Year Olds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Thrive by Three.一项针对托儿所质量建设与质量控制的干预与实施模型,以加强1至3岁儿童的心理健康与发展:“三岁茁壮成长”随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 13;9(10):e17726. doi: 10.2196/17726.
5
Effects of the Caregiver Interaction Profile Training on Caregiver-Child Interactions in Dutch Child Care Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.荷兰儿童保育中心中照顾者互动概况培训对照顾者与儿童互动的影响:一项随机对照试验
Child Youth Care Forum. 2017;46(3):413-436. doi: 10.1007/s10566-016-9383-9. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
A parenting program delivered through existing community-based peer groups to improve early child development in Homabay and Busia Counties, Kenya: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项通过现有的基于社区的同伴小组提供的育儿计划,以改善肯尼亚霍马贝和布西亚县的幼儿发展:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05065-7.
7
Holding a foster child's mind in mind: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial of mentalization-based therapy (MBT) for foster families.关注寄养儿童的心理:一项基于心理化的治疗(MBT)对寄养家庭进行的群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 7;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01103-8.
8
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the Circle of Security-parenting (COS-P) with treatment as usual in child mental health services.一项随机对照试验的方案,该试验比较安全圈育儿法(COS-P)与儿童心理健康服务中的常规治疗。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 26;17(4):e0265676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265676. eCollection 2022.
9
A protocol for a randomized-controlled trial to investigate the effect of infant sign training on the speech-language development in young children born with cleft palate.一个随机对照试验的方案,旨在研究婴儿手语训练对患有腭裂的幼儿言语语言发展的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):2212-2221. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12920. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Postdischarge Intervention for Stroke Caregivers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.中风患者照料者出院后干预措施:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 11;9(11):e21799. doi: 10.2196/21799.

本文引用的文献

1
TEACHING THROUGH INTERACTIONS: Testing a Developmental Framework of Teacher Effectiveness in over 4,000 Classrooms.通过互动进行教学:在4000多个课堂中测试教师有效性的发展框架。
Elem Sch J. 2013 Jun;113(4):461-487. doi: 10.1086/669616.
2
Randomized controlled trial of the Circle of Security-Intensive intervention for mothers with postpartum depression: maternal unresolved attachment moderates changes in sensitivity.随机对照试验:针对产后抑郁母亲的“安全圈-强化干预”:母亲未解决的依恋关系调节敏感性的变化。
Attach Hum Dev. 2020 Dec;22(6):705-726. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1689406. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Impact of Process Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care on Academic Outcomes: Longitudinal Meta-Analysis.
幼儿教育和保育过程质量对学业成果的影响:纵向元分析。
Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):1474-1489. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13296. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
4
The Effects of Infant Child Care on Infant-Mother Attachment Security: Results of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care NICHD Early Child Care Research Network.婴幼儿保育对母婴依恋安全性的影响:美国国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所早期儿童保育研究结果 美国国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所早期儿童保育研究网络
Child Dev. 1997 Oct;68(5):860-879. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01967.x.
5
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.三种新开发的实施结果测量工具的心理计量学评估。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
6
DOES TRAINING IN THE CIRCLE OF SECURITY FRAMEWORK INCREASE RELATIONAL UNDERSTANDING IN INFANT/CHILD AND FAMILY WORKERS?在安全圈框架下进行培训是否能增强婴幼儿及家庭工作者的关系理解能力?
Infant Ment Health J. 2017 Sep;38(5):658-668. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21661. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
7
Mind matters: A meta-analysis on parental mentalization and sensitivity as predictors of infant-parent attachment.思维 Matters:父母心理化和敏感性作为婴儿-父母依恋预测指标的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Dec;143(12):1245-1272. doi: 10.1037/bul0000114. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
8
The Effectiveness of a Large-Scale Language and Preliteracy Intervention: The SPELL Randomized Controlled Trial in Denmark.大规模语言和读写前干预的效果:丹麦 SPELL 随机对照试验。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):e342-e363. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12859. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Mind-Mindedness of Male and Female Caregivers in Childcare and the Relation to Sensitivity and Attachment: An Exploratory Study.育儿中男女照料者的心理-mindedness及其与敏感性和依恋的关系:一项探索性研究。 (注:原文中“Mind-Mindedness”可能是个特定专业术语,这里直接保留英文未翻译,因为不清楚准确对应的中文表述,你可根据实际情况补充完整准确翻译)
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Aug;48(Pt B):134-146. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 26.
10
Effects of the Caregiver Interaction Profile Training on Caregiver-Child Interactions in Dutch Child Care Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.荷兰儿童保育中心中照顾者互动概况培训对照顾者与儿童互动的影响:一项随机对照试验
Child Youth Care Forum. 2017;46(3):413-436. doi: 10.1007/s10566-016-9383-9. Epub 2016 Nov 30.