Student Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):738-752. doi: 10.1177/0969733017720826. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
Maintaining patient's dignity in intensive care units is difficult because of the unique conditions of both critically-ill patients and intensive care units.
The aim of this study was to uncover the cultural factors that impeded maintaining patients' dignity in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.
The study was conducted using a critical ethnographic method proposed by Carspecken.
Participants included all physicians, nurses and staffs working in the study setting (two cardiac surgery intensive care units). Data collection methods included participant observations, formal and informal interviews, and documents assessment. In total, 200 hours of observation and 30 interviews were performed. Data were analyzed to uncover tacit cultural knowledge and to help healthcare providers to reconstruct the culture of their workplace.
Ethical approval for the study from Ethics committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences was obtained.
The findings of the study fell into the following main themes: "Presence: the guarantee for giving enough attention to patients' self-esteem", "Instrumental and objectified attitudes", "Adherence to the human equality principle: value-action gap", "Paternalistic conduct", "Improper language", and "Non-interactive communication". The final assertion was "Reductionism as a major barrier to the maintaining of patient's dignity".
The prevailing atmosphere in subculture of the CSICU was reductionism and paternalism. This key finding is part of the biomedical discourse. As a matter of fact, it is in contrast with dignified care because the latter necessitate holistic attitudes and approaches.
Changing an ICU culture is not easy; but through increasing awareness and critical self-reflections, the nurses, physicians and other healthcare providers, may be able to reaffirm dignified care and cure in their therapeutic relationships.
由于重症患者和重症监护病房的独特条件,在重症监护病房中维护患者尊严具有一定难度。
本研究旨在揭示妨碍心脏外科重症监护病房患者尊严的文化因素。
本研究采用 Carspecken 提出的批判民族志方法进行。
参与者包括在研究环境(两个心脏外科重症监护病房)中工作的所有医生、护士和工作人员。数据收集方法包括参与观察、正式和非正式访谈以及文件评估。共进行了 200 小时的观察和 30 次访谈。对数据进行分析以揭示隐性文化知识,并帮助医疗保健提供者重建其工作场所的文化。
已从伊斯法罕医科大学伦理委员会获得该研究的伦理批准。
该研究的结果分为以下主要主题:“存在:给予患者足够关注自尊心的保证”、“工具化和客观化的态度”、“坚持人类平等原则:价值-行动差距”、“家长式作风”、“不当语言”和“非互动式沟通”。最终结论是“简化论是维护患者尊严的主要障碍”。
CSICU 亚文化中的主流氛围是简化论和家长式作风。这一关键发现是生物医学话语的一部分。事实上,这与有尊严的护理背道而驰,因为后者需要整体的态度和方法。
改变重症监护病房文化并不容易;但通过提高认识和批判性自我反思,护士、医生和其他医疗保健提供者可能能够在他们的治疗关系中重新确认有尊严的护理和治疗。